Many thanks for the fast answer JAYSIN. I'm sure it will be worth the wait. But I'm curious what's going on and if I'm honest I can't wait until HC #12 is finally released. The cast is ultrahot.
One question: Is it possible to shoot Foxy and Priscilla in a scene together with two guys, were both girls get DPed?
And what about double anal in your movies. Wiska and Wendy has done it for Swank Digital. Please shoot a DAP with them also. Maybe some other of the Russian beauties are interested in two dicks up their ass for the right amount of money (Natasha and Rasha comes to my mind).
Camaban, the duplication of the master disk is late and Sin have changed the editors, i told you the same at Eurobabetalk. Hardcore Climax 12 and the other titles will be available in the shops soon.
Jay, just gotta say that you're making the porn I've been waiting to see since puberty. I rarely watch anything else these days, and when I do I wish a Sineplex camera man had shot it. Good work, and don't change the formula!
They spit after a few minutes to lube the girls assholes again and not every 10 seconds, and the girls spit too after ATM. But thanks for your comment, everyone has other tastes.
I am one of Sin's biggest proponents, but the spitting is a problem. It is more with specific male actors than with all Sin movies.
There is one particular guy who just goes way over the fucking line with it.
However, IMO, they get so many other important things right that this is a minor thing for me to overlook. It could be fixed very easily, though.
It's just not hot for a guy to continuously spit wads of saliva all over a girl's parts. Besides, in the guy's case who I just mentioned earlier, it ends up always blocking the view of the actual hole.
Female anus is much more attractive than male lugie.
So, I am not a total Sin sycophant. Things could be imporoved. But like I said, this is easy to overlook considering how they get the important things right so much.
Sin is by far one of the very best pound for pound studios out there, despite not being 100% perfect.
Don't be offended GL. I am with you on Sin movies being outstanding. But people can find something wrong with anything. Nothing or nobody is perfect.
Buffi, you're gonna go over great here, lol. You've just negated the need to respond to anymore of your comments.
A few of the black actors used by Sin and Devil's Films are IMO some of the best black talent around. It's obvious that the girls love to work with them, and that makes for much hotter scenes.
I like to think you're just being cleverly mocking .
Edited by - valjean4876 on 11/11/2005 10:25:48 AM
[Link]
buffi Deactivated User
100 Posts 1/05
Posted - Nov 11 2005 : 11:13AM
the most ppl dont wanna see in non-interracial movs black-white intercourse..thats a fact! there is a special genre called: interracial movs for that
buffi, buffi, buffi, I must not be "most people', 'cos I am more than happy to see sweet caucasian girls taking cock of any colour. In fact, the contrast between a black cock and a white ass is satisfying in its difference. Having enjoyed Monica Sweetheart taking Mandingo or Lex in her ass, Angel Dark taking numerous black cocks anally, Julie Silver loving (begging, actually) Jack Napier from hole to hole, Li'l Roxy Jezel swooning over a black cock taken from her ass for her to suck, Melissa Black, Sharka Blue, Claudia Rossi (latest Gangland) and the great Lucy Lee (Euro) in Black Pipe Layers #4, leads me to conclude your version is not universally trusted.
Perhaps, buffi, it is time for you to open yourself to the unrequited joys of severe anal from a substantial descendant of the African nation. Once you have been opened by such means, you will then be qualified to comment. Good luck in finding truth.
I don't want to defend Buffi because I do not know his motives behind the post he made but it seems that what he wants to underline is that if you are going support an interracial line which Sineplex does it then the interracial sex should be reserved for that line only! At least that's what Buffi is trying to explain so I don't think that he is AGAINST interracial porn in general...which a few comments aboutve seem to imply.
I understand what buffi is saying and it is exactly what Mr PB said : I agree with him. I have nothing against interracial porn : I just don't find it appealing for MY tastes. Many lines that are NOT billed as interracial lines have interracial sex in them and therein lies the problem. My solution is quite simple : If a movie has something in it that I don't like, I don't rent or buy it. It is not a racist issue as I don't rent or buy dvds without anal sex, nor videos that condoms are used.
Same here. I do not buy movies that have gagging and chocing...and ususally do my fair share of research before I order my weekly batch of DVDs. So, I think that the argument was fair...
[Link]
buffi Deactivated User
100 Posts 1/05
Posted - Nov 11 2005 : 4:38PM
Mr. PB has fully understand it. that whole black-white issue should be reserved to interracial movs, whoever wants to see it shall buy those titles but plz no black-white in porn titles who dont aim at interracial flicks.
Well, I guess there's the root of our disagreement. I don't see any 'issue' to 'black-white' intercourse, it all looks like sex to me. Nor do I consider 'black-white' to be the sum total of interracial.
Since it is usually easy to tell by the back cover of the box whether or not there are black male actors in the movie, then I think your solution is an excellent one.
Edit: I wrote this all before I saw the other locked thread. I don't want to throw fuel on the fire, so I'm just deleting most of it. I don't want this thread locked.
Who the fuck elected you to speak for "most people"? Speak for yourself, because you don't know what "most people" think. You only know what you think.
If you don't like the type of scenes that a company puts out, then don't rent or buy from that company.
I guess if he used the word "some" instead of "most" that would make you happier? The guy may be a jerk and is not good at expressing himself but maybe some studios will get the message.
I actually wish all porn studios would make IR the norm so it would save me $$$ and make it easy for me to give up this hobby.
Wow, Hardcore Climax #12 COULD HAVE BEEN a very good movie! All 8 women are gorgeous, but the pixelation especially in the Priscilla/Moni scene made it hard to really get into. Honestly, I am surprised they would even release a DVD with so much pixelation(This was also the case with POV #4 and Young&Stacked 7). This has been a problem lately though for Sineplex and their new editor. If it ain't broke dont fix it! I was very happy with the quality of the movies until the new editor was hired. I just bought a huge batch of Sineplex/Sinsational movies and think I will wait before buying anymore until I know the pixelation problem is taken care of.
Thanks for the heads up Shark. That really stinks. I tend to go for Sineplex for the good quality production. I was just looking at putting Younge and Stacked 7 on my wishlist. Guess that will be put on the backburner for a while, until Sins gets this sorted out. I know Jay Sin has posted here. He's prolly my favorite producer. Maybe he can make some sence of this...? A crying shame really. Sins movies are great. Well the ones that arent all compressed, and edited poorly.
Thanks for the info shark1. I also don't buy any more Sineplex movies until the new editors will be replaced by new ones. In the first scene of Kiss My Ass#3 there's also a lot of pixelation (besides the fact that my player shows a bitrate over 6000 Kbit/s, which normally is more than sufficent for a picture without pixelation).
Then we have the ongoing coding of DVDs. I can't buy Winkers 6 because it's Code 1, Big Black Lil Pink #4 isn't available anymore because it was code 2, Black Meat Please isn't available anymore because the most part of the movie has no sound ...
Until these amateurs edit their movies, Sineplex didn't get anymore of my money.
I must have gotten lucky. I own two(HC12 and YS7) of those movies, without the problem.
I can understand your being angry about that. I have had other DVD's with this problem, and it completely ruins the DVD.
Is pixellation that image scattering effect that DVD's sometimes get. If so, I have never gotten that from a Sin DVD.
However, I have gotten some glare from lighter colors/bad lighting in Sin movies before, and that can obscure things I want to see. Luckily, it hasn't happened enough to cause me to not buy their stuff.
Also, this "glare" is something I've seen from every studio at one time or another.
I didnt know Sineplex was making any attempt to fix the pixelation issues in the movies it has appeared in. Are you sure you have absolutely no pixelation in the Moni/Priscilla scene(first scene of the movie in HC 12). Out of curiosity, what is the disc size(Gig)? Just curious if its different than mine, then we know there is a cleaned up version out there!
Sounds strange. I can't imagine that there are two versions out there?! But at orgazmik the company is called Sineplex Europe, so maybe there are really two different versions. Maybe the Europe version is PAL, not NTSC?
The people from Sin should really post here and clarify things up.
[Link]
Lost Horizon Deactivated User
675 Posts 6/05
Posted - Nov 16 2005 : 6:54PM
I don't understand why Sineplex are changing the style of their covers. They had a good, straightforward, recognisable style that gave you all the information about who was in the film and what sort of acts took place in a quickly graspable way. I don't like their new cover style at all - too arty I think.
My player has an info option where he shows the picture format of the disc, the actual output format, the actual bitrate and things like that.
Without that I only recognizes a short time after putting the disc in the player when my TV switches from PAL to NTSC. That doesn't happen with PAL discs, because the standard format of the Scart interface when I switch on my TV is PAL.
Hope that helps.
By the way: Winkers #6 is code 1 in the original version. Can you play the disc and is your player not a codefree one? If so you will have definetely another version. Please tell me if you can exclude that it's code 1. Then I could order this title from orgazmik, because they sell the version from Sineplex Europe.
I should tell all Sin customers, that everybody should relax now, everything will be OK with the editing and quality of the next releases. Jaysin is shooting in Romania now with 50 new girls. So stay tuned to get the hottest new movies from Sineplex!
I really want to buy Hardcore Climax #13 for the Cherry Jul scene, but before I buy, I want to make sure this title does not have the same pixelation problems as Hardcore Climax #12. If so, I will just rent it. Anyone seen it yet?
Look at the comment here (the last entry from atsival1 at the end of the page).
They cut the entire DP for Cherry Jul out of the movie. The editors doesn't want that Sineplex is selling movies. I for myself are not interested, if whole sex acts are cut out.
It' very sad that Cherry Jul's DP cut out of HC 13 and i don't now why, maybe the scene was to rough. Similar editors cuts happened at other companies too, when a picture of anal, DP or double anal was given and then the scene was not in the movie. Finally nothing dramatically, important is that Sin movies got the good picture quality back.
Camaban - thanks for the info! This title now gets on the rental list instead of the buy list! Hopefully there is no pixelation or it will get thrown off the rent list too.
Gapelover - thanks for corresponding with Sineplex on these issues. Great to know we have someone that can give them feedback on issues such as this.
Stacked 14 - review by Captain Jack
Posted - Oct 25 2005 : 5:42AM
