Reviewers Recommend Hot Wives 8, The - review by Captain Jack Director: Mike Quasar Starring: Van Wylde, Jay Smooth, Codey Steele, Ella Reese, Charlotte Sins, Freya Parker, Melissa Stratton. Read review
^ I think in one of the pics of the cover of the movie shows a DV, though I can't distinguish very well. Note for directors... Guys or Girls.. whoever directs DP scenes or holds the camera please, try not to stick too much in a shot where you cannot distinguish in which hole the dick on the bottom is in. You know when one dick covers the other. I know that you are trying to show more of the woman body but you lose the forest... It is a nice shot indeed but not for very long. Besides, If you adjust the camera a bit you can still get the same panoramic result, without hiding any part of the visual access to the main event. The consummate art of double stuffing suggests the adult audience to have clear view to the Double Penetration event. To see in bright clear shot where the cocks are in. That applies for two in one hole event. I think the visual appeal would be much better. By the way this is a common mistake that many many directors do around the world.
Meanwhile... Explore Sexuality!
[Link]
StarGrek Deactivated User
Under the moonlight. 1763 Posts 10/11
Posted - Aug 6 2014 : 3:46PM
Deborah Prat. From Argentina. Now I know what happened in the locker rooms and the Argentinians lost the football world title. teamskeet... I should have guessed ... damn Meanwhile... Explore Sexuality!
Still searching for the ultimate DP Slut 1367 Posts 11/07
Posted - Aug 8 2014 : 6:32AM
@JuelzVentura shoots some really awesome Double Penetration scenes! I think as fans of #DPBattle we need to celebrate those performers that shoot awesome DP scenes!
I completely agree with you StarGrek. In fact i have lost interest in modern dp scenes for this very reason. I prefer the oldschool style of shooting plenty of closeup shots showing actual penetration, plus you can actually hear ball slapping and various other sound effects that go on so the scene doesn't have to be filled with over the top moaning which is another one of my gripes. In alot of the angles they are shooting these days the penetration could be simulated for all you see from the lens. I mean there is a naked girl and two dicks in the shot but where is the penetration, i want to see her pussy and/or ass stretched.
I respectfully disagree.I think the 'dp time' should be slotted.Like, if the whole dp time is 2 and a half mins. then 1 min can be allotted to close-up and another 1 and half can be allotted to whole body shots.I think the old-style 'dicks going in and out of genitals only' misses some points like who the girl is,girls' facial expressions, female body shots etc.We are not here to watch just that.In that case there is actually no need for different girls.I mean you can shoot with one girl and just edit in that particular shot in different movies. Actually what i am talking about is some good camera angles.It should also be noted that if you keep moving the camera too much then the momentum and continuity gets lost and the scene doesn't register nicely with the viewer.So a delicate balance is needed. There is valid point in your argument of course.So, if the dp time can be slotted then i think we can get the best out of the movie.
imo Hollys most epic dp scene is from 2 Heads R Better Than 1 2... closely followed by 2 in the Chamber 2, I have got heaps of replay value out of those 2 scenes over the years. both are 100% dpp action! just wish digital sin would release a HD version as I was able to get the first 2 Heads R Better Than 1 in 720p from videobox. On the dvd cover it does say shot in HD!
I completely agree with you StarGrek. In fact i have lost interest in modern dp scenes for this very reason. I prefer the oldschool style of shooting plenty of closeup shots showing actual penetration, I respectfully disagree.I think the 'dp time' should be slotted.Like, if the whole dp time is 2 and a half mins. then 1 min can be allotted to close-up and another 1 and half can be allotted to whole body shots.I think the old-style 'dicks going in and out of genitals only' misses some points like who the girl is,girls' facial expressions, female body shots etc.We are not here to watch just that.In that case there is actually no need for different girls.I mean you can shoot with one girl and just edit in that particular shot in different movies. Actually what i am talking about is some good camera angles.It should also be noted that if you keep moving the camera too much then the momentum and continuity gets lost and the scene doesn't register nicely with the viewer.So a delicate balance is needed. There is valid point in your argument of course.So, if the dp time can be slotted then i think we can get the best out of the movie. Yeah i actually agree with you too. When i was talking about closeups i should have pointed out that my favourates dp scenes have a good balance between a variety angles and momentum/continuity like you are suggesting. However the reason i dont like the modern dp scenes is that they seem to have completely backed away from any closeups and shooting scenes with the girls holes on full display. They are now focused on angles which are often a little too panoramic for my taste as StarGrek pointed out. I think alot of the reason dp scenes are shot the way they are now is to keep as much of the guy out of shot as possible while showing as much of the girl as possible however it ends up looking fairly simulated to me and if i was afraid of seeing a bit of man arse in the scenes i would only watch pov.
[Link]
jeffandersonn Deactivated User
1605 Posts 3/13
Posted - Aug 19 2014 : 8:39PM
Jules Jordan is still directing some nice DP scenes with nice close up and right camera angles......
First post in here, big DP fan so great to see a topic dedicated to my favorite. DP My Wife With Me 5 certainly looks great. Kagney and Phoenix's scenes in particular seem like they're smoking hot. Ava Addams' upcoming DP for Brazzers also look like a keeper. Two big cocks for her, yummy. Hope she dirty talks in it, she's great at that ! Looking forward to some good DP discussion in here ;)
^I'm actually leaning towards Daisy but I hear your voice. I'm also still in the process of screening Holly Heart's gangbang scene. Edited by - Mutantmo on 8/26/2014 2:16:09 AM
Totally agree. I havent seen her dp scene but saw her pornfidelity scene and it was hot as hell. A dp scene featuring her and shot by Jules would definitely be on my wishlist. Sad to hear she doesnt get much work, i dont know why she doesnt get the attention she deserves, though it often seems to be the case in american porn where fake silicon looks win over the girl next door look
^ I think something along the lines of DP Masters or Hard X would be ideal for the Smokin' Hot Luna C. Kitsuen! No doubt she could perform right up there with Adriana, AJ and Kagney, if given the chance! I'm pretty sure that Luna would agree to DA at the very least! Can anyone help to makes this happen?
I love all three of KLK's DP scenes. We need more of her doing DP's.
[Link]
StarGrek Deactivated User
Under the moonlight. 1763 Posts 10/11
Posted - Aug 30 2014 : 6:13AM
Oh dear, oh dear… There is a big misunderstanding here. Gee.. I missed a lot.. I was on vacations in Rhodes island (Greece) and I didn’t have time to post back. Beautiness. Honestly folks, I don’t think there is a greater supporter of full body DP’s than me in the entire SITE. Why? Because, I love everything on a woman’s body. Her hair, her eyes, her mouth, her lips, her cheeks, her neck, her shoulders, her arms, her fingers, her breasts, her nipples, her amps, her ass, her thighs, her calf, her feet, her skin and yes, even the nose (did I forget anything?). Needless to mention her pussy, along with its lips and the pubic hair and finally her rear tight entrance. Every one of them is an erotic element that can arouse me greatly when I see it exposed in porn. So the more of them the directors are able to expose in every position, in every act, the happier they make me. Hardcore. In addition with the above, we have to remember, that all the scenes belong to the hardcore porn section. Now, the main difference between hardcore and softcore porn is that in hardcore porn we have what I call “PROOF OF ACTION”. That means that every sexual activity (anal, vaginal, DP in every form etc..) has to be visually confirmed. Thus, you cannot claim there is a DP unless you actually spot in clear view two cocks stuffing both of her lower holes at once. This need for visual confirmation becomes even greater when there is DV, DA or of course any kind of TP. Let’s be honest guys, we like hardcore because we like to see any of a sexy woman holes tapped and stretched to the max and we like DPs because they offer this stuffing satisfaction to completion. Sometimes the director needs to use CLOSE UP shots in order to emphasize on this double filling greatness. Camera Position. Too much close up time though might become tedious. For me, when the director focuses on penetrations he must leave some image room for the girls face or as more of her body parts he can fit in. It is equally important for the audience to distinguish the starlet’s familiar face or body characteristics among the double stuffing event in order to confirm that this is the pretty girl indeed that is getting DPed. So the main goal of every DP photographer is to manage to find the proper camera position, in order to fit in the same screen most of the girls beautiful and juicy assets plus a clear realization shot of the nasty DP event.
[Link]
StarGrek Deactivated User
Under the moonlight. 1763 Posts 10/11
Posted - Aug 30 2014 : 6:14AM
^ Motion. The good thing about modern porn is that most of the adult photographers (still, not all of them) have a good knowledge on how they will capture a DP in order to get the most out of it. The bad thing is that in movies things are very different than in photos. In movies there are additional factors that play significant role as well. The main is MOTION. In fact this factor is so important that many adult spectators can evaluate UNCONSCIOUSLY a DP scene based on this criterion. And I say unconsciously because the human eye is trapped by motion of any kind, so a DP with good and synchronous stroking rhythm (even if nothing else is quite good) can attract attention and therefore positive feelings. Besides this, the vast majority of women like it hard. A vigorous DP will most likely bring them to orgasm. My preference on DP rhythm is to start slowly and sensually in order to give time to the girl holes to adjust on the size of the meaty invaders and gradually raise tempo till double frenzy. There are many more reasons why motion from all participants is of key importance in an adult scene, so generally this factor is something that should be taken into serious consideration in the set up. Some dp positions are very demanding in terms of set up and create many headaches to the directors, however there are simple and ingenious solutions that have been used in the past and work more than nicely.
Eroticism. Another factor that is important for me is EROTICISM. Insensitivity through motion can give a glimpse of passion into a DP scene. But there are other ways the director can achieve the same result. Intimacy. Something that some of you may not know is that when women have sex, they love to feel their lovers as close to them as possible. This is why they prefer a man’s body over any other dildo. So it would be a really good move if the man on top lean towards the woman or the opposite around. This in turn is possible to raise the starlet’s erotic mood and in combination with many other erotic happenings, such as hugs, kisses and caresses, will boost the chemistry and therefore the eroticism of the entire scene. In some DP positions the director has to sacrifice a few seconds from the penetration shots in order to deliver these precious moments in others there are ways to show them all. (I personally adore when the woman in some RC DP versions embrace the pussy guy’s shoulders, grabs his butt or passes her leg around his waist. It is sooo darn hot!)
[Link]
StarGrek Deactivated User
Under the moonlight. 1763 Posts 10/11
Posted - Aug 30 2014 : 6:15AM
Progress. Personally, I wouldn’t like the DPs to start from the very first minute. I would prefer to be “cooked” in the sexual progress and derived to the main DP event as the final act, the final “solution” if you want, to quench a hot starlet’s insatiable lust. Starting from the participants in full clothes, gradually unveiling their “assets”, continuing with mutual teasing and fore playing, smoothly moving to oral, vaginal and anal penetrations and culminating in intensive DP activities, just before the final ejaculations. A small script would also serve the fantasy nicely. Diversity. There are many exciting and hot DP positions that can be applied, each one having its own unique sexual appeal. There are also many versions of each position, based on the way the participants place their bodies, which in turn give a different tone to the action and expose various erotic zones of the starlet. So a smart director should use many positions in order to "please" as many different "tastes" he can. In addition, in each position he could play with the participants body placements as well as the camera angles and zooms in creative way, emphasizing in different pornographic elements like beautiness, hardcore, eroticism etc... Furthermore, he could read the starlets body and pick those positions and versions that would expose her best assets in the best way. Did you know that there is a way to expose nicely a starlets curvy ass in RC? It is a matter of camera angle and body position. Some directors they do. Time. In order to do all the above the director needs to devote time but time in porn is precious because there is a certain limit. So he should use his time wise. Too much time in a single view would make the position monotonous, too few time wouldn't be enough for the viewers to realize and enjoy the action in its full glory. I have huge complains about time distribution in a DP scene the last years. It seems there is a tendency from the part of the directors to favor one certain position in such a big extend that pushes aside every other act or position. Most of the times they even use the same version and angle over and over in various time periods of the scene without any additional pornographic "profit". Meanwhile... Explore Sexuality!
[Link]
StarGrek Deactivated User
Under the moonlight. 1763 Posts 10/11
Posted - Aug 30 2014 : 6:29AM
Guys, I dont know if you are interested to know but Luna did another DP, only this time was with two strap on girls. One of them was Chase Ryder the other one I dont remember. (I am sorry I am so lazy coming up from vacations). It was for Brazzers i think. It was shot in CG (no surprise). There is also a full body version (she was lying on the bed), only this time the girls detached their strap ons and used them as dildos. Meanwhile... Explore Sexuality!
just couldn't agree more or emphasize more on these points.Actually I ONLY watch dp porn because i dont do it in real and i sure would like to see improvements in it. StarGrek if you can make your points heard to industry insiders please do it. Directors are doing well but if these points can be implemented then that same scene will look x1000 better.
[Link]
StarGrek Deactivated User
Under the moonlight. 1763 Posts 10/11
Posted - Aug 30 2014 : 4:59PM
Yes I would also love to see your pussy get stimulated while you get an anal workout. And... I enjoyed No Swallowing Allowed 15 also along with you :) Holly... we have so many things in common... Speaking of pussies... how can you leave such a nice delectable pink slit unoccupied. Especially when it opens so wide from the pressure of an anal invasion. It is inviting you to fill it, to please it to make it squirt all over. I love it when a beautiful woman makes her comment in this site! Gee... Am I stupid or what.... Meanwhile... Explore Sexuality!