I have a new Western Digital 500GB external hard drive that I'm using with my PC that's running Vista. This drive is solely for backups. The file system of this drive is FAT32. Both of my internal drives are using NTFS. Is there any reason why I shouldn't convert the external hard drive to NTFS?
The only reason I've ever used FAT32 was if I wanted to have write access to a Windows shared drive from a Unix based OS. But now that NTFS is write supported in many Linux distros, there is absolutely no reason to format any disk as FAT32.
like Bill, I have a WD external ( a MyBook 160 gb bought about 2 years ago that I actually haven't used yet) also like Bill, I plan to use it only for backups, so to clarify, it comes preformatted as FAT32, if left as FAT32, it would still function perfectly, correct?
Hi, I can only advise people who want to use a huge harddrive for backup purposes to use two !! You may laugh now but once you lost as much gigabytes as i did you know what i´m talking about. Somehow i feel the quallity of harddrives didn´t become better. Back in the <=80G times i almost never had any problems with total loss of data Nowadays it´s more than a pain in the ass Cube
Correct. It comes preformatted as FAT32. It's not necessary to reformat the drive in order to change the file structure to NTFS. At a command prompt, you just need to enter convert drive letter: /fs:ntfs. For my 500GB drive, it only took a few minutes to complete the process. If, for any reason, you want to convert back to FAT32, you will need to reformat the drive.
A related question. I bought a 250 Gb external drive and formatted it as NTFS, but when I looked in "My Computer" it showed as 88 Gb. Can anyone tell me why? It's functioning perfectly, and I'm glad I purchased it, but I'm really puzzled about the 250 vs. 88 business. Thanks
And, another thing... I NEVER shut-off an external drive anymore without first using the "remove hardware" utility first (located in the Task Bar, lower right-hand of screen). On larger drives, Windows sometimes is doing "whatever-the-fuck" with the drive (long after you've done anything with it), and turning the drive off will result in an error (corrupted directory?) that renders the files useless Often, Windows will no longer even see the drive after this has occurred. As long as I mentioned this, does anyone know of software that might allow you to restore the drive so you don't lose the files forever?
Thanks Bob! I seem to be getting a LOT more than 88 Gig on the drive (might just be my imagination), but for future drives, I'll definitely take your suggestions.
There is a possible exception to this rule. Keep in mind, however, that I'm only speaking from my personal experience with this drive and my computer running Vista Home Premium. I have a WD My Book 250 gig drive and have always been able to turn it off whenever (Although I generally don't if I hear that it's accessing) with no problems. Every now and then, when I turn it on, Windows will tell me that it needs to check the file system to make sure nothing is corrupted but nothing ever is. This does take some time but since it isn't my primary drive, I can just let it do it's thing. I turn it off when it isn't in use just to save wear and tear int he mechanism. Almost every hard drive I've ever had has developed buzzing and rattling noises after a while. I've never had one crash. They're just noisy and it's irritating so I try and save as much wear as I can. They're cheaper than they used to be but I don't like dropping $100 on a new drive just because I'm paranoid about my other ones dying. I also have a Seagate in an external enclosure that I bought. It just has a manual switch on the back. I turn it off without doing the safely remove hardware thing. Never had a problem with it. Been using it for a couple of years. This might be more of a problem with XP. I don't know. Edited by - randomprecision on 1/14/2008 3:16:36 AM
I never had a problem either -- until I had the problem twice -- and lost everything on the drive (a 500-GB WD MyBook by the way). Just to be clear, my "remove hardware" comments were only concerned with external drives. My external drives are normally off. I power them up individually as I need to work with them. Once I do, I now go through the "remove hardware" routine everytime I turn them off. The only exception I make is when I power-down the computer. Then, I just turn them off after the computer is off. FWIW, I have had about 6 times when the "remove hardware" utility came back -- unexpectedly I might add -- and told me that a drive was being accessed and could not safely be removed at that time.
Well, fortunately, I don't have anything on any of my drives I'd be devastated if I lost. I wouldn't enjoy it but it wouldn't be the end of the world. Did you try checkdisk when you had problems? I thought I'd lost a bunch of stuff once because the drive showed as blank but after running checkdisk, everything was there.
I just found out that, if you're going to use Acronis True Image with an external hard drive, then it doesn't make any sense to convert that hard drive to NTFS. The first step in setting up the Acronis "Secure Zone" is to create a backup/restore partition, which it formats to FAT32. Since my plan all along was to use this drive as a backup drive, I'm now waiting for a 500 GB hard drive to be reformatted back to the way is was before I started this thread.
One more question. I have an additional external hard drive that I want to connect to my PC (this one is a raw external drive in an enclosure). My intention is exactly what cubesnake suggested. After my recent problems, I want a second backup drive. When I go into Vista's Disk Management screen, it says that I have to initialize the disk before Logical Disk Manager can access it. Then it asks which partition style I want to use for this disc MBR (Master Boot Record) or GPT (GUID Partition Table). The default appears to be MBR. However, I have no idea which option to choose or why. Which option should I choose and why should I choose it?
Well, this is out of my league, really but I looked it up and it seems to me that you could go either way. It seems that GPT is a newer standard but from what I understand, it still incorporates MBR. So, basically, I don't think you can do it wrong. I also ran across a page that tells you how to convert GPT to MBR if you want to change it Here
I've read exactly what you've said, many times. That unplugging without first telling Windows can result in loss of all data on the external drive. But I seem to also remember reading somewhere that you can adjust a caching function. Can't remember the details, so I can't tell you where to look. Shouldn't be all that hard to find. Anyway, the idea is that if Windows is told not to "hold data and write to the drive when you're not so busy", but to "drop what you are doing and write it right now", then your chances of losing data due to forgetfully unplugging are minimized. You'd have to pull the plug right while it is writing. Disadvantage is that this method might slow down other things going on with your computer. Ever read this? ... experimented with it?
I actually might have. It kind of sounds familiar. Problem is I'm an "in the moment" guy. If I have a problem, I figure it out, fix it and forget it. So I may have set a billion Windows settings that I don't even know are set at some point. I haven't reinstalled Windows for quite a while now. And when I do that, the next time I have to do it is always like learning to walk again. I have to go and look up all that shit I didn't bother to commit to long term memory.
Hi, willywilly wrote:Since i don´t have an english OS i cant tell you exactly how to get there but you can click on that c:\WINDOWS\system32\diskmgmt.msc . It will open the right programm . On the left side you see your drives. Do a right-click on the drive you want to remove without telling windows first. A new window opens with 4 tabs. The 2nd on from leftside should be the one where you can change this. Not sure if it applies to XP home and profesional or just to profesional Cube Edited by - cubesnake on 1/25/2008 12:23:56 AM
Yes, I've tried the caching variations (after the very first time I lost the data on an external hard drive). I have been fucked by both variations! Hence, my "safely remove hardware" advice. The "safely remove hardware" process is so easy, so quick and so painless, that I can't think of a single reason to find some way to avoid doing it And, as I indicated, I believe it has saved me from disaster on about 6 occasions.
Seriously, thanks for sharing your experience. I'm not glad it happened to you, but I'm glad you mentioned it. That eliminates any fence sitting on the idea that I posted about.
.
I don't think the idea is to avoid it, but to insure against forgetting it.