FYI, the "cumshot recap" chapter on the "Down the Hatch" DVDs (the Mike John stuff) is awesome! Usually 15-20 minutes of cumshots!

[Link]

I think the reasons that you don't see that kind of thing, are pretty clear though. Most of the time when you see that kind of thing at all, it is done with cuts, so in reality, the end of the scene facials happen before the mid scene ones, so it is rarely done as you would like to see, no interuptions, the guy pulls out shoots and goes back to work. It is a little dissapointing that you do not see more of that, but understandable.

Most Gonzo male performers are a bit overworked anyway, and you would have pretty pathetic shots from a lot of them if they were cumming twice in every scene. It could be a money thing to that you do not see it that much, and to bring in an extra guy or two for even a scene or 2 a film would get a little pricy I would think unless they were amateurs, which would probably bring in more issues than it would be worth.

I don't know but I would especially think that might be why guys like Jules don't do that sort of thing, because he more than anyone it seems really puts the importance to massive facials, and it is just a fact that you would lose some of that spectacle if he had mid scene cumshots. You know when you watch a jules jordan video, that it is building to something spectacular and that there is a good chance the poor girl or girls are going to get blasted like never before, and while it would be great to see more of that, the very end of the scene would lose some of the impressiveness.

Maybe I am way off, that is just my guess, hopefully some people who know why can chime in and tell us. Maybe if enough of us say we want more of it, then some directors will start doing it more.

[Link]

Julie Silver takes a facial from a guy (XXX Road Trip #4), then another pov facial from the cameraman (I think maybe Erik Everhard), then gets fucked for another 4 or 5 minutes with cum all over her face. The guy pulls out for a p2m pop, and finishes the job. Julie is always exciting, but this is just a very hot scene. Lots of energy, DP, DA, everything except anchovies. Then Julie does the post-pop chat with cum all over her face (and that great Czech accent). She's a great actress, and I believe she is really enjoying what she does.

I agree with Linus on the logistics of such a scene. If you pop in the middle with only 1 or 2 guys, only the best are going to have enough wood left to keep up a good scene... plus are you really going to get a great pop at the end? Probably not.

But I do like this sort of scene myself. Maybe I'll practice more to deliver. :)

lANCE cUMMING

Edited by - dood on 9/17/2004 1:57:57 PM

[Link]

Brian Surewood has huge loads and his second is usually the size of an average man's load. I've used him several times for a multiple load scene.

Tony T. is another guy that can pop up to four times in a scene. He's young so he can usually get off decent sizes per load as long as he drinks enough water I guess.

Then again, I've seen performers bust early and try for their final load and all you practically see is air coming out. Now talk about frustrating when you're talking about the money shot.

Chico

[Link]

I much prefer that the girls work over one stud at a time (instead of trying to service 3 to 10 guys at the same time). I have no problem with a girl going through as many as 10 studs and cumshots during the course of the scene, but any more than two at a time (I love you DP fans) is just not interesting.

I've seen scenes where a girl primarily has a sex scene with one stud to cumshot, and THEN we get a parade of studs cum through for quickies and pop shots.
This works very well!
In fact, I think this would make most porn appeal across MANY types of fans. I primarily like one-on-one stuff and others like multiple (numerous) partner scenes.
While we're on this, I see a great opportunity with these "single stud/then multiple stud" scenes to have a variety of cumshots too.

I'm a big fan of drenching oral/facial cumshots.
I KNOW how disappointing a scene can be when it ends with a cumshot you don't like. MOST fans seem to feel the same way with their preferences.
So, it would seem to me that these "single stud/then multiple stud" scenes have the potential to please the vast majority of fans... if done right.

What we DON'T need are more scenes of girls taking on 6-10 guys at a time, trying to do all of them simultaneously, then having everybody pile on – while the girl kneels there motionless, holding her mouth open like a trash can – and dribble their loads into her mouth.
Spread the pop shots out through the scene. Give them all the proper cumshot treatment. Usually the last 20-30 seconds leading up to the cumshot are the hottest part of the scene. Why not give us the buildup and thrill of the cumshot as often as possible?
Have her swallow them one-at-a-time; THAT'S sexy!

If you still want to give us "borderline bukkake" scenes by all means do it. May I suggest one good scene of this type per "normal" movie would be a good and welcome bit of variety. More than that should clearly be labeled and marketed as a niche product (like all BJ movies are).
Let the cum fly

[Link]

It was one of the best sights ever....I agree totally!!!

[Link]

I also agree with many of the other comments in this thread regarding girls with multiple guys -- pace the cumshots... it gives a focus to the scene to have at least one guy nearing climax at any given time... and it avoids the stupid cumshot fire drill at the end.

[Link]

FBB

[Link]

I agree with the consensus...this is hot porn and helps to break up the "standard" format of reserving pop shots for the finale. Guys can be multi-orgasmic with the right discipline. This is one way to seperate the viagra-poppers from those who really are good swordsmen.

Edited by - lubenluv on 11/6/2006 11:12:50 AM

[Link]