I prefer mother/son myself Try the original Taboo Taboo 2 and Taboo 3 definitely had some father/daughter stuff. Don't confuse these 1980's vintage Kirdy Stevens movies with all the other "Taboo" movies done over the years. Edited by - BigBobxxx on 12/23/2007 4:13:55 PM
Ginger, now we need a pic of YOU giggling. That would help the thread out. Does this seem creepy - I just saw you in New Whores on the Block. I loved the crawling down the stairs and across the floor stuff. Now I hang my head in shame.
Pick up your head, no shame, because it's not creepy! Is it weird that I crawl up the stairs in my house all the time? I'm not normally being followed by a camera though...
calm down you lads, I was just curious about this subject. I'm no sick perv not to worry I dunt speak with marble on my mouth I' m british 'tis how we spell in my county. if ye dunt like it I can talk regular english too. Ah americans..
I work with a woman whose husband did some "father to daughter" stuff, he's currently doing thirty years in the state's maximum security facility. They have him in ad-seg - 23 hour lockdown and he gets 1 hour per day to exercise in a dog cage so other inmates won't kill him. His former family is waiting patiently for him to be released - with knives and small caliber pistols. They have every intention to gut him like a fish - wake up and smell the coffee pedo. Edited by - mastrick on 12/25/2007 10:27:15 PM Edited by - mastrick on 12/25/2007 10:28:05 PM
I think it could work if the father and daughter were having sex with different people in the same room. I don't know if it's legal to do that but if it was legal I'd watch it.
Actually, aside from the many Americans, there are a ton of Brits and Europeans on this board, and I'm one Australian amongst several. We all tend to use regular English to the best of our ability as it makes it much easier for us all to understand one another rather than posting phonetically as though we were Ali-G and Borat. I hear it's grim up north... [:P)] - scipio
I think I saw a father who had a sexual relationship with his daughter at Jerry Springer a few years ago. The girl was like older than 18 and she was oke with her father being her boyfriend. So if they would decide to do a scene together with mutual consent would you guys watch it? I myself would have no problem watching it, hell I already watched real twin sisters together like the Urine Twins (Anja & Katja).
It doesn't have to be anything sexual between the father and daughter I just want to see how they interact during the scene. I would love the tease aspect of the scenario.
Time Magazine Thursday, Apr. 05, 2007 Should Incest Be Legal By Michael Lindenberger/Louisville When the Supreme Court struck down Texas's law against sodomy in the summer of 2003, in the landmark gay rights case of Lawrence v. Texas, critics warned that its sweeping support of a powerful doctrine of privacy could lead to challenges of state laws that forbade such things as gay marriage and bigamy. "State laws against bigamy, same-sex marriage, adult incest, prostitution, masturbation, adultery, fornication, bestiality, and obscenity are ... called into question by today's decision," wrote Justice Antonin Scalia, in a withering dissent he read aloud page by page from the bench. It turns out the critics were right. Plaintiffs have made the decision the centerpiece of attempts to defeat state bans on the sale of sex toys in Alabama, polygamy in Utah and adoptions by gay couples in Florida. So far the challenges have been unsuccessful. But plaintiffs are still trying, even using Lawrence to challenge laws against incest. In Ohio, lawyers for a Cincinnati man convicted of incest for sleeping with his 22-year-old stepdaughter tell TIME that they will make the Lawrence decision the centerpiece of an appeal to the Supreme Court. "Our view of Lawrence is a fairly narrow one, that there is a Constitutional right under the 14th Amendment's due process clause that says private consensual activity between adults cannot be criminal," said J. Dean Carro, the lead lawyer for Paul D. Lowe, the former sheriff's deputy sentenced in 2004 to 120 days in jail after pleading no contest to incest. But Houston lawyer Mitchell Katine, one of the attorneys who handled the Lawrence case before the Supreme Court, isn't so sure the court will agree. The state, he said, will likely argue that the intimate facts of family life in this case are different enough from the facts in the Lawrence case that Lawrence's privacy protection should not apply. "That's the hurdle they have to get over." They have already failed to do so once. The Ohio Supreme Court rejected the plantiffs' argument that Lawrence created a new fundamental privacy right that made laws restricting consensual, private sex among adults unconstitutional. Instead, prosecutors successfully argued that Lawrence said only that anti-sodomy laws bore no rational relationship to a legitimate state interest — the lowest of Constitutional barriers. Agreeing, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that state interests in preventing incest — even among adults or step-relations — were perfectly legitimate. The issue does not appear to have been challenged in federal court previously, though the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in 2005 that a Wisconsin law forbidding incest among blood relations (but not including step-relations) did not conflict with Lawrence's ruling. But in upholding prison sentences for a brother-sister couple in that case, the court acknowledged that the language in Lawrence is all but certain to prompt more challenges to prosecutions for sex-related crimes on privacy grounds. Katine said he hopes the muddied waters can be cleared up by the U.S. Supreme Court soon. "I really hope that the Court will take an issue and explain what they really meant." Justice Anthony Kennedy's ruling in the Lawrence case was greeted enthusiastically by those who thought it would usher in a new era of privacy rights. But lower courts have been very careful about interpreting the decision. The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, for instance, twice rejected efforts to broaden Lawrence. In 2004, it upheld Florida's law prohibiting gay adoptions by saying the importance of providing for children gives the state the right to set rules for their adoption. And later that year, it ruled that a district judge in Alabama had erred in using Lawrence to strike down the state's prohibition on the sale of sex toys. Only in Massachusetts, with its famous gay marriage decision handed down four months after Lawrence, has a top appeals court sided with plaintiffs seeking to use the decision to void state laws regarding sex or marriage. "When we first read some of the language about dignity and how the state doesn't have a right to impose its moral code on its citizens, we thought this decision would be extremely powerful and widely followed," Katine told TIME. "I am disappointed that the lower courts have not followed some of the language that is contained in Lawrence." If the Court declines to hear Lowe's case, others less fraught with taboo could take its place in seeking to define the reach of Lawrence. The ACLU has filed suit in several states to challenge the few remaining statutes that prohibit unmarried couples from living together. This is the sort of case that may have a better chance of expanding Lawrence's reach, said Katine.
I don't think the latest version of the Collins dictionary has your pronunciation, but pronunciation is all about your social class within society. personal attacks removed by mod. Mod: Hello. aussie_guy77: Lay off the personal attacks and arrogant presumptions. They're less welcome here than posting in a silly phonetic accent. lobster: No retaliation or flames, please. Thank you, - scipio Edited by - scipio on 12/28/2007 5:48:09 AM
WTF??? Did anyone else notice this. STEP daughter A stepdaughter is NOT RELATED to her stepfather for fuck's sake! What kind of brain dead silly ass legislature would make this a criminal offence?
This is why I strongly suggest you obey the law. I will discuss societies attitude about sex and our laws on sex, but you have too live within the law. I personal don't think the government has the right say who has sex or how you raise your kids. But until the law is changed and societies attitude changes you have to obey the laws and submit to what's acceptable to society.
I'm not sure what the law was at the time. But most of these laws are very resent. When the Supreme court started ruling laws on sex unconstitutional the lunatic religious right went into a frenzy and demanded the passage of more laws banning sex. Soon-Yi Previn Shortly after separating from Farrow in 1992, Allen openly continued his relationship with Soon-Yi Previn, Farrow's adopted daughter. Even though Allen and Previn denied he was ever her stepfather, the relationship drew much public and media scrutiny. At the time, Allen was 56 and Previn was 22. Allen and Previn married in 1997. The couple later adopted two daughters, naming them Bechet and Manzie after jazz musicians Sidney Bechet and Manzie Johnson.
[Link]
john thomas Deactivated User
1168 Posts 6/06
Posted - Dec 29 2007 : 1:06PM
I know in Britain sex with step-relatives is considered incest by the courts generally only when the individuals have lived together as family. My (admittedly hazy) memory of the Woody Allen story is that he and Mia Farrow kept separate properties and he had never lived with Mia as Soon-Yi's father. So it may be that that is the key difference between the Allen case and the Cincinnati man.
[Link]
Kensington Chapp Senior Citizen
Mine is the biggest. 610 Posts 7/07
Posted - Dec 29 2007 : 3:19PM
Get with the program, sunshine. You're making me and her majesty look rather bad. Edited by - kensington chapp on 12/29/2007 3:20:24 PM
In Germany only vaginal intercourse between close relatives (siblings or parents/kids) over 18 is regarded a penal action. It is to prevent inbreeding. If two siblings under 18 do it, it will not be punished. If you and/or your sibling is over 18 you have to do anal to stay out of trouble. I worked together with Sylvie and Sybille Rauch. Two sisters who lick each other on camera. Totally legal in Germany and the movies were sold worldwide. Steve Holmes
But how can it be legal if the father performs anal sex on his own daughter? On the otherhand, provided that the daughter is under 18, any sexual action by the dad must be punished by the law not neccessarily as incest but as rape of a minor.
Any sexual act with a minor who is under your custody is illegal. If it's father/daughter or teacher/student. Even if it is not rape but consensual. If it is rape it will be punished more severe. Steve Holmes
wait... so if in Germany a parent had sex with their own offspring that was over 18/21 years of age, then it's legally ok as long as it's anal only? um... [xx)]
I've seen this before, it's when you adopt a child then legally you become the "father" or "mother". So from a legal point of view you are the child's parent whether its biological or not, hence you can be charged with incest.
I agree I don't think they will let you tell your sister "bite the pillow sis I'm goin in dry" I wonder should that be a law or just a family rule ?? Edited by - Shagdog on 12/30/2007 5:33:33 AM