But is it worth for the likes of Mr. Arnold Seagal to be called a "mean killing machines" or such?

[Link]

-T.C.

Comstock Films:Real Life, Real People, Real Sex

[Link]

The only thing that excites me about the stuff on a box cover, words or pictures, is if it is an accurate description and depiction of the activity contained within.

Any ridiculous hyperbole or flowery porn assessment of the girl; her past, or her character, is of little or no value. Again, unless it speaks specifically to what's in the movie I'm considering.

So to answer your question, No, that doesn't excite or move me.

BSD

[Link]

Edited by - picman on 4/5/2005 11:33:12 AM

[Link]

I got copies of 'A Cumsucking Whore Named Judy Star' and 'A Cumsucking Whore Named Tricia Deveraux', and both movies are excellent compilations, but the titles make me ache a bit. As far as I remember, Tricia herself posted something about that title some time ago, like 'it's stupid and I don't like it, but what can you do'.

I sometimes wonder if people get turned on by this or if the companies misjudge the fact that a lot of people by the movies DESPITE the text. I'm afraid the former is the case.

[Link]

Dick Fittswell interviewed Julie Meadows (interview here) a while back, here's what she had to say:

[Link]

-T.C.

[Link]

Other responses in this thread.

[Link]

Girls who do porn do me a favour and I admire their courage. Do I want to hear they just do that for me because they are stupid or for the money or whatever? Damn no, let me keep the fantasy they do it because they want to make me cum so bad!

I don't mean words like whore, bitch, slut or whatever. These are just rude words for girls who are willing to have sex for money or enjoy sex very much. Since I feel no contempt at all for such women these words are like talking of a cunt instead of a vagina: Not very elaborate but well I can live with it though I prefer talking about girls, babes, chicks, jailbaits (and pussy instead of cunt). Some women might say these are also degrading words but at least there's more eroticism in them.

And how could I not just love a girl whose performances make me rock hard? Better not talk disrespectful of "my" girls!!!
Especially calling Bella Donna worthless and mocking her for the gap between her teeth hurt me personally.
Whoever wrote that shit: If you don't like her looks, don't hire her for your movie but go buying a minimal amount of taste and maybe a clue or two instead.

[Link]

I guess there must be a "misogynist market" that this material is aimed at. Men who have had bad experiences with sex in real life, or who resent the power that women have in the world. Whoever it is, it's not me.

[Link]

Neither does your average frat-boy/loud drunk customer of strip club think highly of strippers. You will stand out as a customer if you are reasonably polite. Kind of a sad statement that politeness will set you apart, but there you go. Useful if you frequent a place.

[Link]

Today the majority of the customers seem to prefer the rough, degradation type scenes and the box better show it without getting in trouble by the government.

So whatever! is the expression I guess to sum up the boxcover art piece to entice the buyers!

[Link]

Blech.

Anyone who says "It's just porn" can expect a severe Chinese Burn from me.

[Link]

If a girl doesn't value what she's got then it can't be any big deal for her to show it on screen , right ? For myself it's more interesting to watch people who give the impression that they are sharing something with you which is actually important to them . That's why I'm always on the look out for classy women (Julia Ann , Monica Roccaforte , Sophie Evans , etc ) and avoid the 'whore' lines . And if anyone feels the need to point out how delussional I am , and that these girls only do it for the money , I know that . Working for the money doesn't mean you can't take some pride in what you do . It's not a crime , ya know .

[Link]

2. To answer Loraine, the comments discussed in this thread do not excite me the least.

3. Au contraire, the comments do remind me of a future X-RAY quote I fully agree with:
"I simply can't get it how someone comes up with the idea to place a pic of a shit heap right next to a women and ask whos the real piece of shit. the answer is obvious anyway: the webmaster!"




Sir Noel Plum said:
"It's amazing to think that all the best legs belong to famous people; what are the chances of that eh 100 billion to one maybe?"

[Link]

Also I can't imagine asking Mrs. RT what she wanted to watch that night: "Do you want to watch 'Euphoria', 'Fashionistas', 'Debby Does Dallas' or 'A Cumsucking Whore Named Tricia Deveraux'?" . She would probably say something along the lines of that doesn't sound like who we met in Vegas & wonder why in the hell I was buying such crap (although I have heard that the video itself is quite good).

All I can think is that such titles/box cover copy would only hurt sales rather than enticing people to buy. I'm sure that there is a market for such but, judging from the responses here, the share that they are turning off is greater.

RT

[Link]

First, in my experience, most girls don't know or care what the title of the video is as long as they get paid. The ones that do care are positioning themselves for a potential contract or other business opportunity.

Two, even though a very unscientific sample of most posters in this thread are turned off by the the titles or text, most are aware of it. Human curiousity often gets the best of us. Even though we find something offensive, it's very nature of being provocative makes it impossible to resist. Remember the statistics that Howard Stern haters listened longer than his fans because, "they wanted to know what he would say next."

I don't like or appreciate these kind of rude tactics, but I suspect they are effective and not going to go away.

For the record, Maxstretch has not and will not use them.

Peace out...

McX

[Link]

-T.C.

Comstock Films:Real Life, Real People, Real Sex

[Link]