BDG, To be honest, in this 'debate', I hate to yield the smallest point, because it is immediately seized upon, expanded to ridiculous proportion, and waved about as if it were a pretty flag. I'm granting that there are minor, almost inconsequential, bits of glandular tissue down there. Do I think they squirt? Absolutely not. They don't have muscle around them to propel the fluid out. A bit of an ooze, a bit of a flow, keeping the bits slippery-sure. Nothing more. To say that the bits are anatomically analogous to the male reproductive system is a stretch, but for the sake of argument, I'll even give you that one. Lets say that hidden in ever woman is a 'female prostate' that doctors have never found. That it, like the male prostate, produces fluid, and that at the moment of orgasm, that fluid is expelled. All of this is what scientists call 'crap', but lets take off our reality hats and believe. Having ejaculated with my own prostate several times, and having (as this is a porn board) seen others do the same on video, I have noticed that there are qualitative and quantitative differences between the male ejaculate and the 'female ejaculation'. Yes, they both come out of their respective urethras, but beyond that, they are very different. First, semen (largely prostatic secretions) is not colorless and watery. Second, even the Peter North you mention doesn't produce a liter. A few cc's, maybe, but quite a bit less than any filmed female ejaculation you will ever see. Interesting, isn't it, that films with FE really only started being available when people were afraid of obscenity prosecution for showing urination, isn't it? So, the rule of thumb would be, if SHE is squirting more than HE is, it is pee. If it is less, then it can come from anywhere, but it doesn't film well, so you'll never see it. As to the samples collected/data analyzed, crap samples and crap analysis by people that are trying to sell you something don't count for much. Myk
[Link]
pussyluvme Deactivated User
I love conquistador & wana fuck him in his ass 70 Posts 12/07
Posted - Dec 13 2007 : 11:51PM
myk you seem pretty sure of your self why is it that you think you no what your talking about?
Anyone with a rudimentary knowledge of anatomy and physiology knows what I'm talking about. Except those that choose to suspend belief because it is either arousing or financially rewarding for them to suspend. Myk
Myk--I think you are trapped in thinking that FE = Porn Squirting. I think your mission is trying to prove that porn squirting is fake. But you've overstepped and include actual FE. FE is real, and it is not defined by what happens in "She Squirts". I am real, bro! I've been squirting since I've been orgasming, and before that I peed for 13 years. I know the difference between the different fluids that come out of my body, dude. I know the particular feelings associated with when I ejac vs when I don't. I know the way pee comes out of my body vs how ejac fluid comes out. 1. "analogous" is not the same as "homologous", which is the proper term when comparing this part of male and female anatomy. That just means that both structures originally developed from the same set of cells before they differentiated. 2. "inconsequential bits of glandular tissue"...there is no such thing dude. The human body is too awesome to call any part, especially an entire gland, especially one that occasionally is a source of cancer for women, "inconsequential". 3. Your whole paragraph about explaining that male and female biology is different...well duh. Who out there is saying that female ejaculate is semen? Nobody. 4. "they don't have muscle around them"... WTF? 2 things. 1, This is an acknowledgement that you've been looking at some kind of diagrams of female anatomy and have seen the female prostate. 2, You're not knowledgeable enough of that anatomy to know that you are dead wrong. No muscles around the urethra? Wow, dude. Wow.
BDG, When you look at the histology of the female urethrea, if there are paraurethreal glands, they are a diffuse, loosely organized bit of tissue surrounding the urethra. That's it. No capacity for fluid beyond a cc or 2. When I say 'inconsequential' it doesn't mean it is useless-making bits slippery is great. What I mean is it produces, compared to the bladder, inconsequential amounts of fluid. Look, you can believe whatever you want, it just isn't so. The only structure in the female pelvis that stores significant amounts of fluid and expels it is the bladder. All the other possible glands, female prostates, whatever you want to lump together, add up to at most a few cc's, and most will leak rather than spray. Now, you can have a urethral diverticulum that can store an amount of urine and have forced expulsion during intercourse. It also puts you at risk for UTI's, esp. after sex. And the 'no muscles around the urethrea' was a slight oversimplification. It should have been 'no muscles around the urethra that can cause the forced expulsion of urine or other fluids", ie that do what you are thinking about when you discuss FE Myk
I think calling it female ejacualation just makes people more comfortable than actually admitting they are turned on seeing a girl piss in another girls mouth. It's easier to market too.
As a female who is able to squirt (not on command mind you) I think it is female cum. and i read that post dumb blonde wrote and she said (correct me if im wrong) that any kind of wetness comes from the bladder? well i know when i get wet its def not piss and when i squirt (and ive tasted it) it is def not piss. ive never been behind the scenes of a squirting movie but I would guess that some of the girls really do squirt, and the other girls prolly do have some water put in them or whatever the trick is. i dont think its piss because a) its not yellow and it surely does not taste like piss and b) it felt like an orgasm *and do u mean to tell me that when i piss its pretty much the same as when i orgasm* the thing is none of us are ob gyns (and if u are do chime in) and squirting could very well be piss, im just not convinced.
