Looking forward to these should be a hell of fun. Charlotte Sartre and Lauren Phillips scenes have anal, and the Daisy Taylor with Kenzie Taylor scene looks hot.
I don't understand toys in these kind of scenes when you end up getting the D anyway, lol.
Yeah, I said I was going to watch the threesome with Jade Venus, Spencer Bradley and Vanessa Vega, despite the toys. However, I'm going to be skipping this scene, sadly. I like both Natalie and Febby as well, so it's a shame to miss out on this pairing. Not really because of the toys, but I'm not really into fisting.
^ They're starting off with a softcore scene between Daisy and Siri. Not an erection to be had the scene long, nor an orgasm from Daisy. Terrible decision, giant let-down. This one is directly on Bree Mills and her chosen agendas. Daisy gets hard and fucks her partner in an upcoming scene on Evil Angel.
The issue is that the director "Bree" is giving full creative freedom to the cast, with no direction. So it's basically a lot of new female faces on Transfixed, but it's super "safe" sex, unlike anything you'll see on Evil Angel or Tspussyhunters etc. Bree gives freedom to the cast to have the type of sex they'd like, which in the case of most of these new female performers, it's like 90% oral and that's it.
That's why i'm not going to support Transfixed. Until they have an actual hardcore scene on there, it's not something i'm interested in.
^ You see, this is the problem. We keep on saying in other threads that we want performers to have a better experience on set and feel like they're more involved in the scene beyond the sex, and yet when it happens, people don't like the way the scene ends out and complain. Not every scene has to be a hardcore pounding, and the hormones that most trans performers are on would make that even less likely to achieve. I would imagine that most trans performers have to take viagra to maintain an erection if required, but it must be nice for them to have a scene where it doesn't matter if they get an erection.
^^I think you are mixing two different things. The people asking for women to have a better experience on a porn set usually mean that they want the performer to not feel as though she was pressured into doing something that she never agreed to prior to shooting the scene or that she is mistreated on the porn set. That last one is more complicated because some sites shoot a kind of porn that is basically the mistreatment of performers so it's much harder for the performer to complain that the producer went too far.
Not sure what a trans performer has to do to get an erection but if it requires artificial means then how is it any different from many of the male performers who do the same because they can't get one or can't keep it for the time it takes to shoot a scene with a girl?
Maybe not all Transfixed videos have to have hardcore pounding but I'm not too sure that there is a market for a scene where there is only oral sex on the female and rimming on the trans performer. Maybe I'm wrong and it will be super popular but to me it doesn't bode well for the future of the Transfixed brand that the first video they release in nearly two years has no actual intercourse in it.
^ I concur. If I wanted to see a video of two performers having a good time, strictly speaking, they could also film themselves having a good meal or playing video games. I mean, it's a porn movie after all. Ok, one could argue no intercourse, but licking and fondling = still a porn movie, but don't blame the customer if he (or she) doesn't see it that way and turns away from it.
^^ If this attempt to give the performers more of a role or to improvise is seen to be a failure, then it will be less likely for other companies to make the changes to make it a better place for the performers. That is my worry. So there is a link, even if you think they are mixed.
Of course, a scene that is oral only will not appeal to everyone. But given that there are oral only sites such as Only Teen Blowjobs, then it can still be a long lasting success, although of course without an erection or cumshot it will be a much harder sell. But if they can mix oral scenes with penetration scenes then I wouldn't be reading the last rights anytime soon.
Yes, male performers sometimes need to use viagra, but I would imagine that trans women need to take it more often as the hormones most of them take lower their testosterone levels and make getting natural erections difficult or impossible depending on how long they have been on the hormones.
Some porn is artsy and some isn't, there are fans of both kinds.
But at the end of the day, it's porn first. I imagine most people watching these scenes are doing it for the action first, and everything else is the cherry on top.
Like the others said, I don't know how successful they're going to be with so many scenes mostly just being about the dialogue, setting and costumes.
I understand that sometimes trans porn might not be as easy to do as regular B/G (for several reasons) but as we've seen in Evil Angel scenes, if you just let the girls go at it for 30 mins you're probably going to get some good stuff out of it. If you do what Transfixed does - lots of production and awkward sets and costumes - it's not going to work as well.
If I want to watch a good show or movie, I'll go to HBO or something.
Maybe Siri doesn't want to have intercourse with a transgendered performer, or Daisy didn't want to have intercourse. So much hype for nothing. I'm cancelling my subscription.
Performers already have a role in the kind of porn they shoot because they get to decide what they do on screen, for which studio they shoot and they can even choose the male and female performer they want to work with. Granted that kind of role can have a negative effect on the number of jobs they get but it's still a choice they can make. If I was a producer who shoots a type of porn scene then I'm sure I would not be open to hearing what the performers "I hired to do a job" thinks of how I should shoot my video especially on the day of the shoot. Now having a constructive conversation with the talent prior to booking them would be a good idea but once I have hired them then they should keep their opinion to themselves.
Are you aware of any oral only sites/videos that cater to women getting serviced because all of the oral only sites/videos that I have seen are ones where it's a man being serviced?
I can't speak to the number of male VS Trans performers who have to use artificial means to get and retain an erection but what I can speak of is that no matter how many trans use those methods. It still pales when you compare the number of scenes male performers shoot per month VS the number of scenes most Trans shoot per month and therefore male performers who use artificial methods to get an erection would have to use those methods more often than most Trans performers.
P.S: On the subject of improvisation. I will point you to the 2016 Ghostbuster movie in which a director allowed his talent to improvise the bulk of their scenes and we can see just how bad an idea that was.
^ There is a difference in making the performers feel more comfortable and them having total control of what is going on. However, Bree in this instance agreed to take more of a hands off approach. Not allowing performers to have an opinion at all is what I would consider part of the problem. Just because someone is paying you doesn't mean you can't have your own opinions on the work.
Of course male performers work more than trans performers. But if trans performers worked the same amount, I would imagine they would need to use more viagra than their male counterparts.
Edit: No. I'm not aware of female or trans female focused oral sites, but as porn is mainly focused on getting males off then that's not surprising. I suppose that lesbian scenes that don't have dildos or tribbing would be oral only, but I doubt there is a lesbian site where this is exclusively featured. Maybe it's an unexploited gap in the market, or maybe it is a gap for a reason.
I enjoyed most of last season's Transfixed and most of Natalie's scenes were reasoning behind it. Not to mention, the Cherie/Venus scene was a great start to the series, so it made me look forward to seeing how the rest of the season would transpire.
Shame season 2 had a disappointing scene to start off, that many were looking forward too. Hopefully, Natalie and Emily will turn things around together.