Boat Drinks!!!

RoccoFan

[Link]

Maybe someone can review this, like BigMike, because i think my english isn't good enough for writing a review.

[Link]

Your English is better than a lot of people I know.

I'd love to review this title, but I don't currently have it and I have a feeling that by the time I do get it, there will be a review of it somewhere on the web.

---BIGmike, over & out!---

[Link]

All I ask is that RLD not half step. If you're gonna do it then fucking do it right. I have no problem with them not having a line that features black females. I do have a problem with them being a "Hardcore" porn company and coming out with "softcore" porn that features black females.

Ok so you can't find enough anal ebony goddesses to fill a DVD...fine...just incorporate the ones you can find into your other titles. Don't try and overachieve when you know you can't deliver what fans have come to expect.

Bottom line: I'd be happy if Black Chicks, White Dicks contained at least two anal scenes each edition. I don't think that's a lot to ask.

Boat Drinks!!!

RoccoFan

[Link]

But this was only average (not enough anal)......

Edited by - Hardz on Aug 25 2002

[Link]

When I say I'm willing to settle for 2 anal scenes I'm speaking specifically about the dvd's that feature black females. What I'm trying to do is accept the reality porn producers have to deal with.

Let's say you start out with a pool of 100 women that do porn or want to do porn. Lets say about 20 of those are black. Let's also say that half or 10 of those will do anal. Then you have to make them happy with the male performer, money, planetary alignment, etc. and you end up with a situation where you have a very limited pool to choose from.

I'm not trying to give RLD or any other company an excuse for not getting the goods. I'm just trying to understand what their side of the story might be.

That said, I think RLD should step up to the plate and deliver high stroke value porn (read: lots of anal)regardless of the color of the model on the box cover.

Boat Drinks!!!

RoccoFan

[Link]

Carmen and Angel Love are in the bonus scene.

I really liked this video, because it was so much better than the other WM/BF videos i have seen.
RLD have done it again.

For the next volume i would much like to see Cashmere as i read she does anal now.

Edited by - fizzy on Aug 25 2002

[Link]

Boat Drinks!!!

RoccoFan

[Link]

Look, what do you expect them to call the series? If I am looking for an interracial porn how am I going to know it's interracial if it doesn't say so in the title? When I'm looking through the price search, I'm going to look for clues in the title for what I'm looking for.
If I'm running a porn company and I want to sell discs, I make sure that the customer knows the content by the title of the movie, pretty simple.
You are saying interracial porn is okay as long as it's not so obvious, I think you should rethink your statement about not having problems with interracial sex, you are saying it's okay as long as it's not advertised so much, just keep it hush-hush. Some people would consider that viewpoint a little racist in itself.
I think they should call the series "Big Black Horse Cocks In Tight White Holes", just so that nobody is mislead by the title.

[Link]

Ali (True Porn Clerk Stories journal that ILMR posted in sex talk) writes some amusing comments about these types of titles...

A lot of porn movies do ape titles - "David Cop-a-Feel" was my all-time favorite - but not as many as you'd think. Most follow a pattern: (A) B N, where A is the race of the participants (optional), B is the sex act or kink - sometimes this gets astonishingly specific - and N is the number of the series. Thus you get "Blow Bang 25" or "Asian All-Anal Action 15". The "Little White Chicks, Big Black Monster Dicks" (note intriguing combination of race and fetish) series has some of the most offensive cover art I've ever seen, not because of the sexual content but because it's incredibly racist. The little white chicks look at you demurely over their shoulders while surrounded by scowling African-American men. The men are repeatedly referred to as "monsters" ("monster dicks" itself doesn't bother me because it merely implies that said dicks are monstrously large, but referring to men themselves as monsters is another story) and their faces are actually mounted on cartoon animal bodies. There's no way in hell you could put that cover on, say, a book and not get your store burnt down, and perhaps rightly so. But my well-meaning liberalism can pretty much go screw itself, as the series is cheerfully (and heavily) rented by all races.

[Link]

As for the series, I can't say I agree with your reasoning considering we are talking about porn, but I do accept you point of view.

Boat Drinks!!!

RoccoFan

[Link]

When I 1st replied to this I had the Big Black Monster Cock series in my mind, not WDBC, that's my fault. And yeah, I see how you don't understand that. What Steph posted is kind of on point and how I feel about it. It's not really what's going on it, but how they're presented. The 1st and only LWCBBMC I seen, I couldn't stand. Jake Steed was chasing around Kurious in the woods and what not. That's my fault, I wasn't more clear. I can't say I have a problem with this specific series because I never saw it.

[Link]