I'm just curious though. What difference does it really make? The first time you see a gal doing a b/g, it's the first time for YOU to view it. Does it really make that much difference whether it's her first time?

Myself, I would be more interested in the BEST b/g scene, and the BEST performance or movie.

DenverDon

Edited by - DenverDon on 4/27/2005 7:02:52 PM

[Link]

I think Stunt Girl 2 is one of the more amazing adult movies to come out in the last two years. If I was voting, I'd have to give it a "Best Movie" of 2005 (so far). Some people think that it's a waste of time, because it isn't a gonzo, and that it doesn't have a theme they like. Or they hate gun play, or whatever.

Then we have the fact that I would tend to give a feature a "Best Movie" over a gonzo. Most gonzos are pretty much the same to be. Good for one thing, and some do it better than others, but none would be in my "Best Movie" list. Others wouldn't give any feature a "Best Movie" because they don't care for features.

[Link]

Totally agree with you that 'best' is subjective. That is one reason I read so many reviews. A reviewer may say he thinks a particular scene is the performers best, and then they describe it. From the description I can then decide if the reviewer's viewpoint and mine match.

Also, part of my point is that usually the first scene for a performer is not necessarily the best. They get better over time as they get accustomed to the particular act they are performing. Many 'newbies' can look almost lost in their first sex scenes and it is sometimes obvious that they are being 'directed' on what to do next.

DenverDon <<<<[[[[

[Link]

Audrey Hollander or Julie Meadows look even better in action now than when they were doing their first few scenes.

[Link]