Featured New Release
Box cover for Chloe Cherry Is Euphoric
Chloe Cherry Is Euphoric
Studio: Team Skeet
Release date: 7/28/2026


all new releases
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 762 > Flesh Hunter 4 - how about a re-release ?
AuthorPost
Hardz
Member

Hell on Earth
877 Posts
6/01
Posted - Jun 1 2003 : 3:15AM
Will Evil Angel re-release Flesh Hunter 4 without the watermark ?

I want it but will not buy the watermark version.

M.B.
Senior Member

1679 Posts
2/01
Posted - Jun 1 2003 : 8:09AM
Me too, especially since WOMD #2 was really dissapointing. Mark Wood and Jon Strong, WTF? I thought JJ's stuff was supposed to be of the highest quality and we have to endure watching these guys doing the ladies. Might as well put Ron Jeremy in it.
DenverDon
Benevolent

Firmly Embedded in Depravity
5914 Posts
7/02
Posted - Jun 1 2003 : 8:22AM
Instead of remastering FH4, I would rather see them continue to get the backlog of titles on DVD.

Besides, it wasn't that big of a deal anyway. Too much fuss was made about it.

DenverDon

Bill All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

5334 Posts
6/00
Posted - Jun 1 2003 : 10:04AM
That's purely a matter of opinion. Some people hate condoms and won't buy movies that contain them. Other people don't mind them. To the people who don't mind them, the issue's not a big deal and too much fuss is made over it. To people who hate condoms, it's a HUGE deal, and not enough fuss is made over it.

The exact same thing holds true for Watermarks.

BIGmike
B-I-G-m-i-k-e

2335 Posts
3/01
Posted - Jun 1 2003 : 11:01AM
Don from Denver summarizes my opinion...

Besides, it wasn't that big of a deal anyway. Too much fuss was made about it.

...and I would rather Evil Angel spend more time getting the Joey backlog out on DVD than to worry about a watermark.

I have seen Feeding Frenzy, and have watched it through, but that watermark, while at times is annoying, is barely noticeable. But maybe I wasn't looking in the bottom corner the whole time.

Anywho, opinions...

- - - B-I-G-m-i-k-e, over & out! - - -

 
DenverDon
Benevolent

Firmly Embedded in Depravity
5914 Posts
7/02
Posted - Jun 1 2003 : 11:39AM
Bill,

I agree that it is a matter of opinion.

However, at the same time that everyone was talking (negatively and positively) about the watermark, I happened to pick up some RLD titles that suddently had 'navigation' thingies on the screen. They covered about the same amount of space as the 'watermark' that caused so much controversy. No one said anything about them, or objected to them. They were as obtrusive, or unobtrusive, as the controversial watermark.

Hmmmm.

DenverDon

BIGmike
B-I-G-m-i-k-e

2335 Posts
3/01
Posted - Jun 1 2003 : 1:26PM
Actually Don, there was a stink over the navigation menus that were on some of RLD's DVD, which is why they've stopped using them.

- - - B-I-G-m-i-k-e, over & out! - - -

rjk13
Member

peace, love and revolution
321 Posts
10/02
Posted - Jun 1 2003 : 1:46PM
I started a thread on the navigation thingie, where lots of people chimed in.

I'm glad alot of us made a big to do over the watermark, cause now its gone, just like the navigation thingie. Its great that some porn producers listen and respond.

Now if we could only get rid of the TV station watermarks...

Bill All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

5334 Posts
6/00
Posted - Jun 1 2003 : 2:48PM
Then you missed a few threads. The fact that the addition of these menus caused the DVD's to work improperly caused this to be the bigger complaint than the actual menus, but there were definitely suggestions that, once they fixed the problems, RLD make the menu an option rather than a requirement.

The biggest difference between the RLD menus and the JJ watermark was that the RLD menus were there to provide the viewer with something extra (the ability to jump to a specific segment of the movie). The JJ watermark did nothing other than detract from the quality of the image on my screen.

Bill All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

5334 Posts
6/00
Posted - Jun 1 2003 : 2:55PM
Good luck. I actually read a post at AVS Forum that an engineer from our local PBS station told someone that the reason that they weren't showing the PBD HD demo loop on their HD channel is that they didn't have the equipment to place the watermark on the HD signal yet and that it is an FCC requirement that they have the bug .

Either this guy (A) is full of shit, (B) is really stupid, or (C) works for someone who told him this. If C is the case, then A or B applies to the guy he works for.

DenverDon
Benevolent

Firmly Embedded in Depravity
5914 Posts
7/02
Posted - Jun 1 2003 : 3:17PM
whoops,

Guess I did miss a few threads somewhere. I know that the menu navigation thingies didn't work well on my DVDs, but the discs seemed to play okay otherwise.

My bad I guess. Thanks guys.

DenverDon

Bill All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

5334 Posts
6/00
Posted - Jun 1 2003 : 6:13PM
We may be pains in the ass...but at least we're consistent pains in the ass.
Hardz
Member

Hell on Earth
877 Posts
6/01
Posted - Jun 2 2003 : 2:16AM
Once you Hens stop clucking, I may get an answer from someone at Evil Angel.



Jump To: