....it's either very new cheese or very old meat 102 Posts 12/09
Posted - Jun 28 2022 : 7:34AM
I'm not sure if the right section to be posting in (mods: please feel free to delete if not), but I'm trying to find a forum (either here or elsewhere) for discussing camsites and the performers on them. Surely there must be a few.
You bring up a good point. With the popularity of cam sites and OF stars, it may be prudent for ADT to include a forum for that fanbase. I'd welcome discussion along those lines as a lot of new porn talent is rising from the ranks of camstars and OF content creators.
....it's either very new cheese or very old meat 102 Posts 12/09
Posted - Jun 28 2022 : 3:04PM
Yes, and I'd say the traffic is flowing the other way too, with many established stars doing exclusive content on their OF accounts. Also, Cherrypimps seem to do Gold shows on Streamate with established stars (Haley Spades did a show yesterday). Not sure if these are different to their Wild on Cam site content, or if they then make these shows available to download on their site.
I've been thinking the same thing. Cam would be a great addition. Discussions based on 1) Cam performers 2) based on cam sites. In my experience, users tend to invest time more in 1 cam site than others, and cam sites tend to have a pool pf performers.
It's fun to have kaleeshy on the TV, she's charming, sings and plays the guitar while I cook or whatever. And I can send thank you credits. Beats the heck out of having CNN or whatever on.
I've been pondering this very thing for a while. I'll put some more thought into it.
The forum section would be geared more towards "Adult Content Creators", which in my feeble mind is defined as people that produce their own stuff and market it direct to consumers. This is OnlyFans, the various cam sites, etc.
I think it would be a worthwhile addition to the forum.
OF and Cam aren't my cup of tea but I'm still curious to see what people have to say on the subject. I just wonder if the sheer number of models that populate these type of platforms makes any meaningful discussion harder than more conventional sources. I man with conventional sources of porn you can access the content of multiples models but with Cam and especially OF. You are usually required to pay for exclusive access to individual models thereby significantly limiting the number of people that will be able to do so.
I've been thinking about adding the Content Creators section to the forums for a little while. I'll admit that I'm not remotely close to an expert in the area so I could use a little guidance on what the structure of the forums. There will be a new section with sub-forums. Much like Porn Pool and Star Crossed are part of the Porn Forum category/section.
I am thinking the sub-forums could be 1) Cam sites, 2) OnlyFans-like sites (ManyVids, etc.) 3) Creators
I'm not sure if this structure makes sense. Most Creators will have a presence on a cam site and OF, and possibly ModelHub or others.
Speaking of ModelHub, it's essentially PornHub, a site that we haven't allowed people to link to forever because of the rampant promotion of pirated content there in the past. Is that still the case at PornHub? I think a lot of Creators use PH to promote their OF and other publishing outlets.
I will add features to the ADT database to extend the concept of a movie Performer/Actor to also keep track of links/data for Content Creators. That way topics can be tagged with the Creator's name/profile much the way performer topics are currently tagged. It makes it easy to find other topics related to the Creator. (Need a better term than Creator, feels god-like)
- Creators, versus the cam and OF/MV/Indie Scenes. Would that be similar to Star Crossed vs Porn Pool? Eg keep them separate, as in mod moves incorrect posts from Porn Pool to Star Crossed?
- What is Creators vs Star Crossed? Many mainstream stars now do their own content, and indies go mainstream and back.more and more of a blurred line
- On cam sites, you load up on tokens. So, people tend to be "sticky" to their preferred cam sites. On the basis, may make sense to do subforums for each (top 3?) popular sites (CamSoda, Chaturbate, etc) + "others"
- On sites like OnlyFans, ManyVids, people tend to be "sticky" too. I am no expert there. Someone else may know more. May make sense to do sub-forums for the popular sites + "others"?
- Can't comment on ModelHub. Seems to me a secondary place and less active place where creators keep copies of some stuff but keep OF or MV etc as their primary site
- Market changes fast.I guess any type of site organization will require a yearly evolution
- I am not aware of good discussion forums for these 3 main categories. A place with the solid reputation of ADVDT, plus a middle finger to piracy, will probably be super welcomed by a lot of people!
I suppose that simply changing the scope of Star Crossed could accommodate most of the Creators discussion. Don't peg Star Crossed to "porn stars", e.g. performers in porn movies, because the line is definitely foggy.
With respect to having sub-forums dedicated to the various cam sites, I have considered it. But there's really not much about the sites to talk about. The discussion will largely be focused on the Creators that happen to use those outlets for publishing their stuff. I doubt people want to talk about the pros/cons of the site features of Chaturbate over MyFreeCams/StreamMate/CamSoda/etc. It's all about the creators. And I think most of the top Creators have a presence on all of the major platforms.
You do bring up a very good point about piracy. Cam content seems to get ripped off and republished almost immediately. It's insane. Of course we wouldn't tolerate linking to sites like that but it will certainly be a game of whack-a-mole for a while. We already get DMCA Takedown requests from copyright protection agencies like Cam Model Protect. They seem to demand the removal of content that simply mentions a Creator's name, not just images. There will be a learning curve in this regard. I hate to get into a pissing match with lawyers over takedown demands for legit forum discussions through the abuse of the DMCA process.
^ That's a good point. Creators are on multiple platforms.
".demand removal of content that simply mentions a creator's name." Do you mean take down requests if their performer name is mentioned? That's crazy! I don't get it. Why wouldn't they not want mention of their performer name?
They use automated systems to crawl the web looking for their client's content. They search the text of a page as well as using fingerprinting mechanisms for detecting images too. Their automated systems generate the takedown requests. They will fire them off to Google, the website's ISP and the website. It's a huge PITA. I realize they provide a valuable service but it's a complete abuse of the DMCA process.
Why wouldn't they want a mention of the name? Their goal is to give Creators complete control over their content and marketing. I'm familiar with Cam Model Protection. They provide the model with a means of specifying which social networks they use for promotion. Basically a list of places where their name/image is allowed to appear. Any other sites get takedown requests.
Got another takedown request notification from Google this morning for this page. The details of who requested the removal are not available yet but will be at this URL eventually. I'm guessing it's a service like Cam Model Protection. This kind of thing happens all the time with cam models. They get the entire page removed from Google and will often attempt to demand the entire page be removed from ADT as well because it mentions their performer name.
^ I could see if she wants the screenshot of her IG story removed. Those aren't supposed to be permanent. But the rest? She herself posted (in the embedded tweet) that she's worked with reality kings, and they will certainly be posting her name everywhere they want. The post from 2019 was put there by Porno Dan who paid her to shoot for his studio, after which he owns the content and the right to release it under her performer name and do what he pleases with that info/footage. He chose to post here to promote his site with her name. (Her scene came out on immoral live in late 2019)
Is there a way to tell her we'll remove the IG story but the page stays up? (Although maybe the first question I should ask is if it's worth fighting this at all.)
edit: wait I see she hasn't posted on twitter since Feb. I think this is a case of her wanting the universe to forget she ever did porn, while still not ditching her sources of income (twitter promotes onlyfans, fansly etc that she can keep earning money from even though she's retired)