All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 720 > Fraudulent rear cover in Harder Faster 3 > Fraudulent rear cover in Harder Faster 3 (page 2)
Page 2 of 2 First
AuthorPost
Ramsey
Senior Member

Trina Michaels fan
10332 Posts
10/02
Posted - Feb 5 2004 : 1:39PM
Damn, I bought the US version because I could get those cheaper and because I thought they were the same as the European version.

Why does Hustler have to screw us like this?

Sbando Boy
Euro Babe Magnet

1839 Posts
6/01
Posted - Feb 5 2004 : 2:07PM
I have the US version as well, and there's no mf dap.
Ramsey
Senior Member

Trina Michaels fan
10332 Posts
10/02
Posted - Feb 5 2004 : 2:26PM
SB: you're a moderator, should we open a new thread about this whole Hustler Superfuckers fiasco, after all, the Harder Faster 3 problem seems to be solved and I think it deserves it's own thread and maybe the Hustler spokesperson will to respond to that thread.

noproblemo
Member

348 Posts
12/02
Posted - Feb 5 2004 : 2:34PM
Some vidcaps of the elusive dap with Ester (Vanessa Virgin) in Superfuckers 14 (European edition): a b c d

Is Hustler afraid of potential legal problems with displaying such acts in the U.S.?

 
Sbando Boy
Euro Babe Magnet

1839 Posts
6/01
Posted - Feb 5 2004 : 2:42PM
No, I'm no longer a moderator. My opinion is the following:
This has nothing to do with NS/DS, mind you. They're doing a fantastic job and their releases are consistently excellent.
We know companies' figures, more or less. They don't sell 5.000.000 copies of a dvd. They sell 3.000, when they're really good.
Companies should fucking stop to mislead the fans and the consumers. What for? Attracting the casual video renter?
About Hustler:
I can't check Sup14 now, but I'm pretty sure there's no dap in it. Ironically, the Euro version has a "tame" cover and Sup gets renamed "SuperHighlights" or something like that.
Anyway, V. Virgin's edit is the only one that I know of.
Just a few months ago, Hustler has reprinted Dora Venter's dap so there's no logic.

Ramsey
Senior Member

Trina Michaels fan
10332 Posts
10/02
Posted - Feb 5 2004 : 2:42PM
I just checked my copy of Superfuckers 14 btw and it's the european version after all (from Anchora in Amsterdam). For a moment I thought I was screwed.
Gapelover
Senior Member

Master of Gapes
1933 Posts
10/03
Posted - Feb 5 2004 : 2:59PM
Ramsey ,have you read my reply to the Private Lecastel movie ?

Edited by - gapelover on 2/5/2004 2:59:41 PM

Ramsey
Senior Member

Trina Michaels fan
10332 Posts
10/02
Posted - Feb 5 2004 : 3:02PM
You mean if Lecastel is still with Private? Not to my knowledge. It seems he's fulltime at Digital Sin but it seems both Private and Anabolic still have stuff of him in stock.
Gapelover
Senior Member

Master of Gapes
1933 Posts
10/03
Posted - Feb 5 2004 : 3:11PM
The scenes in Private's "Wanna cum for a ride " are definatly new .Britney take five guys on the same chair in the garden than in HF3 .
Wally
Senior Member

1821 Posts
8/01
Posted - Feb 5 2004 : 3:55PM
...I don't have the Superfuckers any more but I don't recall any dap, damn, I don't even remember a dp in Ester/Vanessa Virgin scene. Further more, if you read my review, I was complaining that the second guy Woodman used was just sitting there doing nothing besides jerking off (which seem odd) ...now it makes sense, the guy did his job really, the edited dap make him look like if he was just sitting there doing nothing for too long. ..Shame on you Hustler! ...Woodman always used to use girls for daps and double vaginal here and there in his Private videos. If you don't have Woodman in a leach or editing out his stuff, then why daps and dpps went missing in action right after he started working for you? ..just a honest question from a dedicated Woodman fan ...Just let me congratulate you on the inprovement of Woodman's other series like Anal Intensive & Hustler xxx, great video quality! ..now if you could let Woodman make his feature films as hardcore as the gonzo ones, I'll be on my way to buy them too
lfp2003
Member

109 Posts
12/02
Posted - Feb 8 2004 : 2:31AM
Wally, I've seen enough of your posts to have thought that you wouldn't pass judgement quite so quickly.

We should have an answer for you all on this later this week.

If there is indeed no DAP on the U.S version, but there is one on the European version, the only plausible explanation is that one of our editors thought that daps or dpps were not approved.

Considering that Woodman sends us his edited version, and all we do is cleanup on the title (audio etc), no other explanation makes sense.

If this proves to be the case, we'll put the scene as a bonus on Manipulation (our new Woodman feature out in a couple of months) and anyone who has posted on this thread will be sent a free copy.

As for whether we edit out any of Woodman's material, this does happen on occasion. We do listen to legal advice, but at the same time LFP has never backed down from potential trouble if the situation warrants it. Interestingly, after final editing a Woodman title, we send the master to our licensee for European release. How the dap got back on the title is another question which we'll look into (although this is obviously the one positive in all of this).

Wally, as for your 'shame on you Hustler', I think that comment is more appropriate in the event there is wilful deception or an effort to screw the consumer. We're involved with ADT because we want open dialog and we welcome feedback, both positive and negative.

However, to give the impression that we're sitting in our offices devising ways to screw the customer over is simply false, and somewhat discouraging. As the post on 'Harder, Faster' demonstrates, companies mess-up-it's called human error, and it isn't always down to corporate machinations.

It just doesn't make sense to alienate customers, and we don't benefit from removing scenes if we have no legal cause to do so.

On the other hand Wally, than you very much for applauding the improvement in Anal Intensive and Hustler XXX! We'll let you know what 'Manipulation' offers by way of hardcore action asap.


At the start of the week,

Ramsey
Senior Member

Trina Michaels fan
10332 Posts
10/02
Posted - Feb 8 2004 : 4:58AM
So does Woodman edit his movies himself and are you saying that the US and Europe releases of Superfuckers should be %100 the same?
RonK All-Star Supporter
Big Double Everything Fan

Poor Turkey running for her life with Christmas Hat
3713 Posts
9/01
Posted - Feb 8 2004 : 12:45PM
Nice to see that LFP2003 cares.

Ron

Zander69
Member

Europe
124 Posts
12/03
Posted - Feb 8 2004 : 3:04PM
Thanks a lot for this beautiful vidcaps, noproblemo! I bought SF14 today and I do hope so much I have the Euro-version! Will check that up just afterwards...cannot wait to get another 3 minutes of Vanessa-Virgin-workout.

Editing out a DAP...damn! I still cannot believe it! Hope this can happen only in the US...

 
lfp2003
Member

109 Posts
12/02
Posted - Feb 8 2004 : 3:36PM
Hi Ramsey-the scenario below is the usual occurrence. However, on occasion we do remove scenes which we consider to be physically or verbally degrading to women. I very much doubt that the daps were removed for this reason, though. Rather than get into the subjective merits of what is and isn't degrading to women (Andrea Dworkin would say all porn is degrading to women), we try to strike the right balance between pleasing the customer and acting responsibly.

As for whether the U.S and European versions should be the same: Because we provide our European licensee with a finished, audio-cleaned version, they should always be the same. That's what we're looking in to. What could possibly have happened is that the ommission was noticed on the U.S version and was changed in time for the European release. I'll know more next week, though!

Zander69
Member

Europe
124 Posts
12/03
Posted - Feb 8 2004 : 4:09PM
Maybe somebody at the editing desk thought DAP was degrading to women...! Or even Hustler as a company is thinking so...

Why? Oh why? (read too much Dworkin maybe)

Ramsey
Senior Member

Trina Michaels fan
10332 Posts
10/02
Posted - Feb 8 2004 : 4:18PM
This could be the problem right here. I mean why not let us fans decide what's degrading or not? I mean what's the point of releasing hardcore movies if you're gonna remove all the hardcore stuff?
Wally
Senior Member

1821 Posts
8/01
Posted - Feb 8 2004 : 4:56PM
I'm sorry, Mark. I didn't mean to be so harsh with my coments (but the dap was missing indeed ..Please acept my apologizes. ...The good thing is that Hustler is listening to the customer and trying to fix any mistake that might have been done while editing some of those Woodman videos. As you said there is always the human error factor.
you are more than welcome, the video quality is great. About info on the Manipulation video, please do, I'm very interested in the cast of Manipulation and what those hotties may do ...Just wondering but any idea on re-editing old Hustler xxx titles (like #8, #11 with the new, inproved image quality? ..I'll be willing to buy them again if you do that.
lfp2003
Member

109 Posts
12/02
Posted - Feb 8 2004 : 5:05PM
Wally,

No apology required, but thanks anyway.

I think it's a good idea to re-edit some of the older titles. It might cost more than it makes, but as you noted, we've made a commitment to a higher quality than before, and this is something that should be done as a matter of course. It might take a little time, but it would definitely be worth it for Hustler and for supporters like yourself.

Thanks.

Zander69
Member

Europe
124 Posts
12/03
Posted - Feb 8 2004 : 8:35PM
SHIT! SHIT! SHIT! "Printed in the USA" it says in small letters on the back cover. And I was almost 100% sure to have bought the Euro-version in Europe!

So no DAP, just Vanessa gets a very short CG-anal and than suddely the cum-shot is about.

What a let down!

All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 720 Fraudulent rear cover in Harder Faster 3 > Fraudulent rear cover in Harder Faster 3 (page 2)

Previous topic: Which movie?
Next topic: creampies scenes
Page 2 of 2 First



Jump To: