im all for girls doing what ever the hell they want... but i dont understand why a girl who comes from an affluent family would do porn AND THEN not stay in it if it was just for rebellion... i mean she obviously wasnt doing it for the $$$$ she had that from her family, and she didnt stick around enough to make it her rebellion.... any thoughts? "im the girl your mother warned you about"
^^ Gabriella may have wanted to "rebel" against her family--most young people do--but, from what I've read in other posts, she may not have been comfortable with porn sex. Not good if you're in the porn biz.
[Link]
carl72 Deactivated User
471 Posts 12/08
Posted - Dec 30 2008 : 2:01PM
Your guess is as good as mine on why. Honestly, I do think she was a lot of hype overall. She is attractive, but wasn't an even above-average performer in anything I have seen. Plus those breasts are silly large and totally artificial looking. I liked her stuff, but I don't think her run will go down as anything all that memorable. If she had stayed at it, there was potential.
Gabriella with Jesse Jane on the cover of Club Feb 2009. Club 02/2009 I for one am going to miss her, anyone know how many of her movies have yet to be released?
Just picked up a copy of Club and I can confirm that the pictures inside are even hotter than the cover. Hopefully they filmed a scene at the same time.
[Link]
satchman23 Studios - do not send screeners to this person.
1906 Posts 12/06
Posted - Jan 7 2009 : 10:35AM
Very hot issue of Club! Picking up worthy for sure!
^Thank you very much for the link. I just love these pictures. They are so much better than the pics from Digital Playground. She's not airbrushed to death in these and I think she looks amazing. The fact that she once did a softcore set for Suze under her contract star name means nothing by the way. She is out of the business.
[Link]
satchman23 Studios - do not send screeners to this person.
1906 Posts 12/06
Posted - Jan 10 2009 : 10:02AM
Smoking hot natural looking set of pics! I hope if it is only print work that she stays in the biz if at the very least that is all she does. She is too dam hot to just go away and not see her again anywhere and in any form. Gabriella please stay with us!!!
Her performances were fairly terrible. She doesn't seem to "get it". You get the feeling she's maybe not overly bright - as in she has little practical smarts. Given this, I don't think her performances would necessarily have improved either. I thought she was hot until I saw her perform, and then it was a turnoff - and not in the Allie Sin bitchy I don't wanna be here way (which is downright funny). It's a shame because she could've been a keeper. And yeah, her boobs are ridonkulous - not cool.
[Link]
satchman23 Studios - do not send screeners to this person.
1906 Posts 12/06
Posted - Jan 10 2009 : 1:51PM
You have not made many posts and your already ripping someone! Edited by - satchman23 on 1/10/2009 1:52:41 PM
Since when does having a high volume of posts qualify one to share an opinion or not. Her performances are lukewarm at best, and I stated the reason why I speculated they are so. Further, my other 2 posts today were both complimentary, so on balance I am more positive than negative. Sorry if you disagree.
[Link]
carl72 Deactivated User
471 Posts 12/08
Posted - Jan 14 2009 : 8:27PM
[ invalid url ] The preview trailer for Nurses. Due out at the end of February. The last of the Gabriella Fox scenes are slowly being released. Looks like her usual 1 scene and done. Doesn't look like her employer gave much consideration to her carrying a feature movie. Strange considering how much they hyped her up.
ha hell if i know.... she should have gone the playboy route then tried ut porn not go about it backwards she will never make it into playboy magazine.... which if she would have done the playboy thing first it may have worked out better ya know bigger name.... playboy is the only magazine who wont put porn stars in their magazine to keep it "more classy' blah blah blah..... eh whateves.... ya win some you loose some.... like i said before she just couldnt hack it! could you imagine what an anal scene would be like from this girl? "im the girl your mother warned you about"
^Yep - boring, and I would turn it off. She comes across on-screen as no fun and not too bright. What a waste of DP's time she was. I suspect they delayed the launch of Riley Steele titles to focus on Fox, and now it was all for nothing. [Mod edit: the "quote" button is not the "reply" button. There's no need to quote a post directly above your own. Just use the "up arrow" like I've done for you here.] Edited by - killbillvol69 on 1/21/2009 5:20:51 PM
[Link]
carl72 Deactivated User
471 Posts 12/08
Posted - Jan 23 2009 : 12:45PM
I just saw "Nude". She is total corpse in it. She makes Chasey Lain look like Jesse Jane in terms of energy. The thing about a girl with a particularly attractive face is that she can hang around in the business and be plastered on box covers and make money forever. Even if she isn't worth a damn as a performer. Guys will always buy it. I thought this girl had potential after a decent turn in "hard candy 4". Sounds like this just isn't for her and she has ended the whole thing on her own. I won't lie and say that we all lost a great performer.
^I think it could be the company (digital playground), and how they want her to perform.. I'm hoping, bc geez... boring is an understatement (spec in "Nude"). Shes sexy and all, but that just doesn't cut it. [Mod edit: guys, seriously, stop quoting the post directly above your own. Just use the "up arrow".] Edited by - killbillvol69 on 1/24/2009 5:53:53 AM
ya kn ow maybe she was just being herself.... she obviously didnt like doing hardcore..... and thats just how it was.... i mean if she was into it it wouldnt have shown through "im the girl your mother warned you about"
^Toss up there. Actually a good comparison. She gave a decent knuckle shuffle at the end. She has a built in advantage being considered far prettier than average. She only has to be half as good at the job and guys will gush about her performance and will buy the next one. The editing was very poor and you got the feeling that these we're two actors and one of them was trying to fulfill her contract by fulfilling like the moaning requirement clause. It was definitely her worst work to date. And being worse than some of her other efforts is no easy feat. I think the approach with her was all wrong from the beginning. They should have done taken advantage of her looks and done more feature type stuff with her and give her 2 or 3 scenes a movie, have her run around naked or scantilly clad more, weave in a cheesy plot. Like they used to do with Chasey Lain in her earlier work. She was so good to look at, that even the luke warm sex was tolerable. The gonzo like format puts the emphasis on her screwing talents and this girl don't have any. But she is plenty pretty enough to compensate. So put her on camera more. [Mod edit: don't quote the post directly above your own. Just use the "up arrow".] Edited by - killbillvol69 on 1/24/2009 2:48:45 PM
^ Good point Carl - yeah, they might have had some other options to make her work out. Performing is interesting, no matter the overall quality of the performance, there are usually at least a few "intanglibles" - subtle things the performer does - that are hot. With rare exception, I basically saw none of those with GFox.
yea, you are prob right.. I just don't understand why DP would accept these horrible performances. I wonder how many scenes Digital Playground has of Ms. Fox.
Let me know if she ever decides to work with Elegant Angel, Evil Angel, or Jules. That's real hardcore. Contract companies suck. They just want your money.
Best cover picture of her yet. God she has such a nice body, a lot of actresses don't have that sudden slim waistline. It is such a shame it did not work out. Her scene in "Nude" was atrocious - was like watching mannequin get fucked. Let's hope the scenes that will be released are not coated in radioactive touch-ups. Edited by - nightTemplar on 2/17/2009 10:59:30 AM
bono-ONE wrote: News flash, all porn companies want your money otherwise they'd cease to exist. No shit sherlock,but I'm paying to watch people fuck not make out. Don't get me wrong she's hot as fuck, but I want to see her get defiled. That's just me. I don't want to see her act. If you watch porn for the acting. Then just watch a fucking soap operah. It's the same shit. Cheesy acting with no sex. I don't like no one to dangle a carrot over my head so I could keep the conveyer belt going people fuck you out of money everyday this is America remember. I just choose get something of value for my MONAAAYYY.
i'm kinda tired getting suckered into buying a new Gabriella Fox dvd.. hoping "this is the one where she really gives it 100%". I think im pretty set on her just not being a good performer.
satchman23 Studios - do not send screeners to this person.
1906 Posts 12/06
Posted - Feb 18 2009 : 12:56AM
I agree the movie looks dam good! I really liked the music in the trailer. This looks to me like this could be Gabriella's best scene to date from what i saw in the trailer.
[Link]
biermacht Deactivated User
83 Posts 2/01
Posted - Feb 18 2009 : 12:11PM
The Bad Girls scene was the first scene she shot for DP.
thats laughable.... im sorry but why would a virgin go get her tits done? or decide to do porn because she just thinks its funny? and to piss her parnets off.... that spells whore in many ways! "im the girl your mother warned you about"
[Link]
john_qyoo_public Deactivated User
265 Posts 7/05
Posted - Feb 19 2009 : 11:56AM
Tragedies like this one make me think we need more true gigolos in porn. Shouldn't one of the more elite gigolos have been used here, to seduce this chick before the cameras even started rolling? Then she could turn in decent performances with a guy she's infatuated with instead of 5 crappy performances and out. Maybe my strategy is crap, but I still think the porn industry needs to do a better job at motivating the super-hot girls like this so they stop making 5 movies and leaving.
[Link]
carl72 Deactivated User
471 Posts 12/08
Posted - Feb 28 2009 : 7:41PM
Same old same old. 1 scene and out. Judging by past performances, 1 pretty lame scene at that. They really mishandled this girl. Not that she was ever going to be Jesse Jane or anything, but they just didn't give her a chance to grow an audience and maybe play a character as a real star.
well mommy and daddy have lots of money, and i guess mommy didnt want her little girl doing porn, her mom had driven her to set and they started getting in a heated argument about what she was doing. the girl wasnt doing porn just bc she loves sex and is sexual thats apparent...based off what you guys say she was a dud.... so put two and two together! "im the girl your mother warned you about"
I'm fuzzy on the whole "good/bad" thing. What do you mean "bad" ? 296 Posts 11/08
Posted - Apr 4 2009 : 9:01AM
Even taking all the negative comments into account i can't help it... i like this girl Hope DP still has some scenes of her to release under their desk.
[Link]
satchman23 Studios - do not send screeners to this person.
1906 Posts 12/06
Posted - Apr 4 2009 : 9:05AM
I agree! I not only like this girl i love this girl! Just don't pay any attention to anything Mackenzie says on anything!!!
Gabriella Fox @ Adult Empire
Posted - Dec 29 2008 : 4:28AM
