How much individuals does there need to be for it to be considered a Gangbang? I ask because I've seen Lisa Ann with 3 guys at once, DP and everything yet they're billing this new movie as here 1st Gangbang.
I wouldn't be too sure about that. For example, Leanni Lei's first anal scene (according to her) wasn't released until after she had left the business - years later.
[Link]
Kaminsky Deactivated User
272 Posts 4/11
Posted - May 6 2011 : 2:49AM
This question was asked on another thread. I say that for a scene to be a true gangbang the ratio must be at least 5 to 1. That is the ratio used by Anabolic Videos for their Gangbang Auditions series. This is in contrast to the Anabolic series the Gangbang Girl, where the ratio was always at least 10 to 1 or higher. lol, gangbang ratio, it is porn math time.
[Link]
Kaminsky Deactivated User
272 Posts 4/11
Posted - May 6 2011 : 2:52AM
So using this criteria, you will see that the 3 to 1 scene Lisa Ann did was NOT a gangbang In her new DVD for Elegant Angel, the ratio is 7 to 1. So it really is her first gangbang
3 guys gets you airtight, not sure what 4 gets, but 5 or more seems right for GB. I think the Playboy advisor once wrote 3somes only describes a guy with 2 girls, and anytime there's more than one guy with a girl, it's a GB. I never understood that approach.
Even back in the day when I was just a porn fan, the minimum number for me was 5. I just don't see how 3 dudes on a girl could ever be considered a gangbang. Isn't that a 4way? Even 4 dudes wouldn't be enough, but, that could possibly pass. 5 has always been the safe bet for me.
We discussed this in the chat room recently. I asked the same question regarding blowbangs. Blowbang fanatic Taylor Von Bailey said three made a mini-blowbang. So we concluded three or four guys made a mini-gangbang.
But most gangbangs don't feature that manouvre (air tight plus cocks in hands). I always find it annoying when there are a lot of guys in a gangbang but only 3 are being used at a time and the others are standing around.
[Link]
Bagshot Deactivated User
35 Posts 5/11
Posted - May 6 2011 : 7:53PM
Gangbangs are primarily an excuse to hide all evidence of a female.
[Link]
Kaminsky Deactivated User
272 Posts 4/11
Posted - May 6 2011 : 8:11PM
^What you are describing is seldom shot because it is very difficult to shoot that and keep the girl center-camera. It ends up being a screen full of man-flesh with the girl and the action obscured from sight. It is even more difficult when the girl is small. You know most porn girls are quite petite. That is why they used so many overhead shots in the Anabolic Gangbang Girl series. It was the only way to capture all the action and get a good shot instead of just a crowd of the hairy man ass. Scenes are only exciting when you can see the girl
I think it's as much to do with how the guys are used as well as how many there are. For me a gangbang is about simultaneous acts. A bunch of guys doing a relay one or two at a time isn't a gangbang IMHO, it's group sex, even if it's 5+ guys. A gangbang for me is when a girl for a good proportion of the scene is involved with five guys, maybe four. Yep, airtight + two hands is definite gangbang porn, but it works just as well with four for me - DP + two hands, DP oral and one hand, DP + double oral are definitely busy enough to be a gangbang for me.
[Link]
arhed Deactivated User
137 Posts 1/11
Posted - May 8 2011 : 6:20PM
My way of understanding it was that there needs to be atleast 3 guys and 1 girl. 3 guys - 3 holes.
[Link]
Kaminsky Deactivated User
272 Posts 4/11
Posted - May 8 2011 : 6:59PM
No, the proper ratio is at least 5 guys to 1 girl What you are describing is a foursome
Are you implying that fans of gangbang porn are gay?
[Link]
Uber Kaminsky Deactivated User
48 Posts 5/11
Posted - May 15 2011 : 3:29AM
Yes that is what that post is implying. Not the first time it has been implied about those who like gangbang scenes, ha ha. Actually some might argue any scene with more guys than girls is somewhat homoerotic. Especially if there is dick-to-dick contact. Think about it. Double blowjobs, double vag, double anal ... that means dicks touching dicks. That is pretty damn gay. Look at this, this is supposed to be a hetero scene 4Gifs link You can't deny the homoeroticism!
I think you're focused on the wrong aspect. More guys to a point means more continuous long duration stimulation for the F. Forget about how many guys, what really matters is how many does it take to keep her fully occupied with maximum stimulation for as long as she can take it. That's the minimum number. Some F may need more or less and some M may be able to sustain providing more or less stimulation. That's why some guys are in porn because they can fuck harder and longer than civilians. I understand the numbers game from a porn scene standpoint, but think we should also be looking at it from her standpoint.
^ I agree. [mod edit: quote removed. please do not quote the post directly above your own. just use an "up arrow". thx.] Edited by - killbillvol69 on 5/15/2011 12:51:26 PM
Little Puck Interview
Posted - May 6 2011 : 2:05AM
