[/quote] Thanks for finally agreeing that your disapproval of men acting in gay and straight XXX comes solely from the fact that you're not turned on by it. Not because you're concerned for the health of the women who choose to work with such male performers. [/quote] No...it IS because because of the health risks....I'm agreeing that they should NOT be allowed to switch between gay and straight porn at the same time.....thats all. I give up..
Thanks for finally agreeing that your disapproval of men acting in gay and straight XXX comes solely from the fact that you're not turned on by it. Not because you're concerned for the health of the women who choose to work with such male performers.
Click to expand
No...it IS because because of the health risks....I'm agreeing that they should NOT be allowed to switch between gay and straight porn at the same time.....thats all. I give up..
Click to expand
Did you miss my earlier post where I asked for your thoughts on bareback anal scenes involving girls? They're being put at just as great of a risk as men in gay XXX. I'm not a supporter of bareback (gay or straight), but I can guarantee you that gay XXX doesn't have a higher disease rate than straight. Hell, bareback companies period (gay and straight) don't have higher disease rates than companies that mandate condoms (gay and straight). So, while I agree with you that the health of performers should always come first, you're assumption that women are being put at risk by engaging in no-condom sex with men who have also had sex with men is simply untrue.
pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07
Posted - Apr 9 2011 : 2:30PM
I wonder what you're reaction would be if someone was always posting broad, untrue statements on here about how 'all black are lazy' or 'Jews only care about money' as if it were fact based on their 'personal experience.' Edited by - BlackSix on 4/9/2011 2:32:45 PM
Thanks to this thread ... I rented out She-male Police (it is on its way) If this bigot called "twistedvincent" hadn't started this thread, I would have missed this beautiful title.
[Link]
realtip Deactivated User
2301 Posts 6/04
Posted - Apr 9 2011 : 3:22PM
Are you suggesting that the statement that women generally do not wish to be sexually involved with gay men is the same as making derogatory racial remarks? That's clearly unreasonable. But since you brought it up, the double standard does indeed exist in porn. The porn industry is allowed to be as racist as it wants to be. Yet, no one seems to have much of a problem with it. I don't know of any well-known porn girls who have come out and said that they will never fuck a guy who has done gay porn. I assume this is because any girl who makes such a statement would possibly be placing her career in jeopardy, and she would immediately be labelled "homophobic." Yet, we all know that girls and companies are allowed to discriminate against performers on the basis of race. It happens all the time, and no one even attempts to make a secret of it. But when that happens, it is always simply excused as a matter of "personal choice" instead of the blatant racism which it is. It's not as if the senseless double standard you mention isn't there already. Edited by - realtip on 4/9/2011 3:23:32 PM
The women performers make statements like that all the time. If a girl is well known, or has a fan following, or even if she's new but really hot, she gets to say who she won't work with. Some will say why, and others won't, but there are plenty of women who have a no tranny, no gay, no bi, male talent policy. And if a certain girl doesn't wanna work with a dude for some reason, or a group of dudes for some reason, it doesn't make the industry racist or homophobic.
Perhaps you're not getting the point. You didn't say most women, or a lot of women, or even the overwhelming majority of women. You said that, "only in porn would a woman sleep with a man that is openly bisexual". I don't really care what your argument is about, but for some reason, watching your argument skills has put me on tilt and I had no choice but to point out [mod edit: comment removed. Watch the insults] No offense of course! Edited by - killbillvol69 on 4/9/2011 6:16:17 PM
Alright. It took longer than I thought it would, but at this point this thread is just ppl calling each other stupid. No one's really gonna convince anyone of something now, and I think we can all agree that the OP isn't coming back, and even the OP admits that the post that started the thread was ill-conceived. Thus, I see no reason for this to continue. If you really want to argue about who is homophobic or who is being too sensitive, take it to email. /end
Dad's Lesbian Lover 4 - review by Captain Jack
Posted - Apr 9 2011 : 1:43PM
