more performer info on...

John Thompson

All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 579 > GGG and John Thompson - differences?
AuthorPost
Len Nicodemo
Doctor of Pornography (Po.D.)

On avatar hiatus
1224 Posts
2/06
Posted - Apr 1 2006 : 7:26PM
Does anyone know if there are any significant differences between the two lines GGG and John Thompson?
Ramsey
Senior Member

Trina Michaels fan
10332 Posts
10/02
Posted - Apr 2 2006 : 6:58AM
They're pretty much the same, GGG has more focus on facials just like 666 has more focus on pissing.
Peter1
Member

USA
139 Posts
10/02
Posted - Apr 3 2006 : 8:45AM
According to the website, JT is supposed to have prettier girls. I think it is also a little less hardcore than GGG.
eduardo911
Senior Member

1299 Posts
8/03
Posted - Apr 3 2006 : 11:00AM
There has been a thread on the very same question before.
Not likely, since they use pretty much the same girls. My own impression was that there is slighly more focus on the covergirl in JT, but the differences are marginal.

In some cases, a girl is introduced in JT to appear in GGG and/or 666 later. An example is Annette Schwarz whose first movie 'Die Sperma-falle' (The Sperm-trap) was released on JT. Later she did lots of GGG, JT and 666 movies, and she is now working in the US.

Wodgers
Member

414 Posts
7/04
Posted - Apr 3 2006 : 1:26PM
I agree, the differences get more and more marginal, except for the cover design. A few years ago, the JT line was focusing more on the (cover) girl than GGG, and perhaps also there was more chance of a "girl-centered plot" (so to speak), but it never was very clear. Maybe it was originally intended to be a "GGG-deluxe".

I've always been curious to know the "official" difference between the two lines.

Today, only the 666 and Sexbox lines are distinctive.

 
Len Nicodemo
Doctor of Pornography (Po.D.)

On avatar hiatus
1224 Posts
2/06
Posted - Apr 4 2006 : 6:00PM
I'm sorry if this has been discussed before, but I did a search on the topic and didn't find anything.

Thanks everybody!




Jump To: