Just accessed the RDL website and lo and behold they came out with a new batch of titles:
I Just Turned 17 Yesterday - cool title but I'm wondering if the gals truly just turned 18 when they did their scenes.
Cum in my Ass Not in my Mouth 2 - Holy cow, who is this Elen Saint's and where else can I find her. Not to mention my faves Julie Silver, Lilianne and Lucy Lee (God, I love Euro women) - Further, who is that farting out cum out of her ass?
French Connexxxtions (Directed by Manuel Ferrara) - another newbie looks like in Tiffany Hopkins and what a cutie!
1 in the Pink, 1 in the Stink #3 - Man , Robbie is sure spitting these out rather fast.
Thanks again Redlight for producing these titles rather quick and making me bankrupt! LOL
PS keep it up with new faces and yes, please more Euro babes.
Oh jeesh, not to stir anything up, but "I just turned seventeen yesterday" sounds extremely creepy. That title might end up scaring away a lot of buyers.
This is really creepy! It is almost PEDOPHILE. It is something ,allegedly, Michael Jackson will buy. For the past two years, RedLight was known for their hardcore gonzo, but Yet responsible! What happened? It makes me upset because it puts everyone in the industry in jeopardy. The word seventeen should not be there.
Honestly, I don't find any of these titles that appealing. By that I do not specifically mean the title. I just mean I am not looking forward to any of these tapes. Slowly, I have become bored with RLD and am turning to Devils Film and other companies now. However, Vince, Erik, and Mike always get my attention.
Looking at the boxcover of "Yesterday I Was 17" title on the RLD website, my gut reaction is that the title is about the only thing interesting about it...Brazilian porn has a very spotty track record.
Yesterday I Was 17 is not a great title for sooooo many reasons. It's not even a good marketing idea as many people who buy titles outside of the U.S. will have difficulty with customs. I'd say RLD has had a temporary laps of good judgement.
It's a good thing it has a brazillian cast (ick), I don't mind passing on this one. Anyone else notice the abundance of titles with brazillian girls from RLD? They must have taken a trip down their recently a shot a boat load of scenes.
I'm not a RLD fan at all but I don't think the title is that bad, after all, there's even an adult company called Seventeen here in Holland so it's all good. However, the title is kind of misleading after all, how many girls in those movies were really 17 the day before? ;-)
On a bit of a side note, which porn starlet was verifiably closest to 18 at the time of their first shoot? I think Kacey was 18 years, 1 month when she did "Down the Hatch", but there has to be someone younger.
In that case I got confused with the age of Dynamite, sorry about that.
However, maybe some girl should do a gangang on her 18th birthday, like starting the gangbang right at midnight when she just turned 18 by a couple of seconds. I wonder if this can be done. Legally it should be no problem I think.
Frankly, I'm not sure I'd want to see the sort of girl that would do that while still in high school. I can't imagine what sort of neuroses she would have to be suffering from. It usually take a few years out of school with no money to create a "gang bang" kind of girl.
On second thought, I would probably watch it just to say I did :-)
They're legal for porn when they're 18 so I have no problem watching them do a gangbang at that age besides, some girls are just born for gangbangs. Can you say Trixie Tyler?
My point is sort of along the lines of "How many licks does it take to get to the center of a Tootsie Pop?" -> "How many guys does a girl need to fuck before she'll do a gang bang?"
Now, I'm not saying that I didn't know a lot of sluts in high school (I pretty much sought them out whenever possible), but none of them would've done more that a couple of guys at once. At most, they were with maybe 30 guys before they graduated - not enough in my estimation to be ready for a gang bang.
A girl like this would've had to start slutting around when she was 12, or Daddy and Uncle Vic(timizer) had to fuck her while Grandma watched.
Seven and teen... two harmless words, when separate, but when combined they form seventeen, a harmfull word when put in a title Yesterday I was Seventeen ?
It is "yesterday", which means that the day of the shooting all girls are eighteen, and with someting like 10,000+ titles released every year, how in the world can you think of something different? (How many titles have P.O.V. in them? Every studio seems to have one.)
But I have to agree with what ricorocco opened this thread with, these do look like some great releases.
I hope it's just the camera angle and the effects of her crossed arms that makes Julie Silver look like she got a boob job. Erik, Mike, you were there, did she get enhanced? TIA!
IAFD, supporters of beastiality. Just say no. 7564 Posts 11/02
Posted - Feb 7 2004 : 5:53AM
What do you mean, "newbie"? Euro Babe of the Week 31: Tiffany Hopkins has been in the biz since 2001, at least.
skronker said: "I am a very good cook and I like to buy fancy shoes. And I have some snazzy threads and I ike $20 bottles of wine - oh shit, I'm a 'middlebrow hipster wanna-be'."
For my tastes, Out Numbered #2 and Semen Sippers #2 looks like the most solid titles in the upcoming batch.
Is another A Group Thing title in the works? (Brooke Balentyne would be great, if she is still in the "biz".) The scene in the first one with Ashley Long, Melanie Jagger and Juliana Kincaid ranks up there with my all time favorite scenes.
She was in a couple of (hot) scenes in Rocco's Super Motohard released two years ago in the US. She's in the of Anything You Want , a Dorcel video released in the US last fall. Finally, I have a note that she was in Teen Sensations 4 but I don't recognize her on the box anywhere.
I think most titles with her were released in Europe and never made it to the US.
IAFD, supporters of beastiality. Just say no. 7564 Posts 11/02
Posted - Feb 7 2004 : 1:13PM
That still doesn't make her newbie. Next thing we know we are back to American companies 'introducing' European talent that has been doing porn for months.
skronker said: "I think the U.N. should commend Diabolic for its efforts towards global tolerance in these times of conflict and war-mongering."
Is that why I see the occasional European actress in an American-made New Talent type film, but she appears to do all kinds of anal acts with ease, and looks real comfortable on camera? I bet they have the actress use a different name for her Los Angeles-based career. If anyone would know, it's you.
IAFD, supporters of beastiality. Just say no. 7564 Posts 11/02
Posted - Feb 8 2004 : 11:17AM
Most of the Euro talent who go to the USA use the name they also use in Euro porn. Be it Mandy Bright, Katsumi, Deborah Wells, Draghixa, Anita Blond, Carmen, and many, many others. Most of them are experienced and have at least a handful of European titles under their belt before they appear in US shot productions. Most of them are even fairly well known in Euro porn before making the trek to L.A. There are exceptions, though. Sofia Ferrari comes to mind, as does Gina Rome. Possibly also Angela Baron and some of the Dutch talent of the late 80s-early 90s.
DenverDon said: "It's not stockings that Skeeter is stuffing!"
I think that the title "Yesterday I Was Seventeen" implies that the girls in the movie are now eighteen. Perhaps a better title would have been "I Just Turned Eighteen". That title has more focus on the girls being that age (and therefore being legal) now.
[Link]
Porn Scout Deactivated User
3735 Posts 10/02
Posted - Feb 8 2004 : 10:33PM
I just think it's stupid to name it that way. Besides, RLD already has Brand New and Just Over 18. Why do they need another teen-themed title?
Are you being ironic here Oren, or are you rewriting the dictionary giving all the words your own definitions?
BTW, what is the youngest girl you've ever fucked Oren? Just wondered if you'd ever fucked any 17 year olds and whether you consider yourself a paedophile?
Ofcourse I did, when I was seventeen!!! Since we are "buddies" right now lets take it further I'll show you mine, if you show me yours (I'm being very ironic). Dude what's wrong with you? I understand that yesterday she was 17, today she is 18 and I understand that they got the reaction that they wanted on that title. Lets put it this way, why stop there how about calling a young line " Make room for Daddy ".
I can see Skeeter directing that one. Guess it would have to be a double anal line.
Aren't girls in the U.K. "legal" at 16? Just curious.
I think arguing about titles of porn movies is a little silly. Like, how many titles are NOT completely friggin' stoopid ? Of all the RLD titles, I think Outnumbered is the most clever -- in a totally simple way. Most just state the facts.
What is wrong with me is that your original post was sensationalist in the extreme. I've just googled up this link showing ages of consent in the USA and around the world. Now there is either a lot of paedophilia going around or just maybe having sex with someone under 18 does not constitute paedophilia? By definition, a paedophile is someone who is sexually attracted to children and a child is someone 'between birth and puberty' (according to dictionary.com). Michael Jackson, if he actually is a paedophile, would most certainly not be interested in this video because it features physically sexually mature women as all 18, and indeed 17, year old women are (medical anomolies aside). Tell me, how can it be that having sex with a seventeen year old is okay (as it appears to be in most US states) but using the word 'seventeen' on a boxcover is almost paedophillic as you state? I accept totally that the minimum age for porn is 18 but this is no more than a legal position not a definition of paedophillia; in fact it has precisely fuck all to do with paedophillia. If the minimum age for porn was 50 would you say that 'yesterday I was 49' would be 'almost paedophillic': surely not?
Look Oren, I'm not saying the title is a good idea and I sympathise with the thrust of your arguments that could perhaps feed those who aim to hurt the industry but I just found that particular comment as sensationalist and erroneous as any I've ever read by journalists.
You showed me yours! Well, I had sex with my present girlfriend when she was seventeen but only because she grew out of being sixteen (I was 23 fyi)