Nice to see Hadley in another shower scene! Her first scene had Hadley in the shower with Charles Dera for Brazzers. She does shower sex so well and as the above poster said, her arse is amazing.
^ Deliziosa! CAVAZZANAL [mod edit: quote removed. please do not quote the post directly above your own. just use one of these 'up arrow' things: ^ thx.] Edited by - killbillvol69 on 1/5/2018 12:37:16 AM
Another LA Direct model who wants to leave her agency but is stuck in their contract [Tweet is no longer available] [Tweet is no longer available] Some former models claimed Derek often doesn't even let models buy themselves out / other agency buy them out - it's like he doesn't care about the money they are willing to pay him to terminate their contract and just wants to force them out of business.
^ Who knows though LA Direct contracts are probably the worst in the business since they're designed to fuck over a model if she wants to leave them and may last up to 5 years. [Tweet is no longer available] ^ She's implying that Derek Hay from LADM might be booking her for shoots without telling her and knowing she won't show up - sounds like a very useful way to ruin someone's reputation and get her blacklisted across the board.
-Yes she has a girlfriend/is in a relationship with a woman -She describes herself as bisexual https://twitter.com/HadleyViscara/status/875578053245652992 indicating that she is sexually attracted to both men and women. Edited by - 4theheart on 5/5/2018 7:37:14 AM
If you don't mind I'll use your post to reply to the various people who posted on the subject. If we are to believe Hadley and other LA Direct models then Derek, the owner of a modeling agency who makes his money from booking models, regularly accepts bookings for some of his models knowing that he will never tell them about the bookings. Thereby not only pissing off and possibly alienating the producers who booked those models but also pissing off the models themselves which in turn will make them less likely to want to work for LA Direct as well as make them even more vocal detractors of LA Direct. Let's also not forget that if what Hadley has said is true then Derek not only makes no money from her lost bookings but actually loses some when he has to pay the kill fee the producer will definitely ask for. Now do I believe that Derek can be a complete dick and play hardball with some of his models when he feels rightly or wrongly that they should work when he wants them to even though they don't feel like it. I believe he can be a dick. The question is. Is he being a dick because he knows better than the model that their shelf life is short and they better accept as many booking as they can early on because 6 months from now they will be on a bus going back home because porn was not what they thought it would be and living in LA is a lot more expensive than back home.
^Oh boy pat is back into lawyer mode. No, Derek could just claim that the model is lying about him setting this mess up, and in turn the producers will probably believe Derek because he obviously already has a powerful position in the industry. New hot girls are considered easily replaceable and not worth the trouble for some sort of 'investigation'. Plus how many girls like Hadley are there in this position? Almost none compared to the LA direct models who are actively working under contract.
^Is it really trying to be a lawyer or simply using logic? I mean even if the producer believes Derek. He is still responsible for the kill fee because the performer happens to be one of his clients and therefore any cancellation on her part becomes his problem to fix. What you are basically saying is that Derek is willing to cut off his nose to spite his face. Somehow I don't think that is a good business plan. I just have one question for anyone who disagrees with me. Why would Derek(or any other agent) go out of his way to black ball one of his models knowing that she won't be able to work and therefore he will lose money from all the jobs she would have gotten from the producers who requested her in the first place?
^How much would a kill fee be for a no-show? Every shoot has different costs. If he were to set a girl up like this he would probably choose an offer for a regular gonzo scene in a cheap place, as opposed to a large production scene with planned themes, costumes, expensive location etc. Also, this agency regularly gets multiple models booked for one shoot. I would imagine that the damage wouldn't be big if Hadley "no-shows" and they change the shoot to a B/G at the spot because the other performer was present. Remember, all it takes is one or two of the no-shows and all the producers get word of it and she's done. It's not like Derek needs to pay 10 kill fees. Basicely if you look at the amount of power this guy has and how he can set it up, it really isn't hard to believe that he can screw up a performer's career with these tactics. Is it true? I don't know but where there's smoke there's fire. There's a lot of stories about him.
^Not a clue but let's assume assume that your average porn performer gets paid about 1000$ for a standard b/g vaginal only porn scene(the most common thing shot in porn) and a kill fee must be at least be 25% to 50% of that so that means that the kill fee is anything from 250$ to 500$. If you consider that the agent makes at least 10% of what the performer earns than instead of making 100$. He looses from 250$ to 500$(don't forget kill fees are paid by the agent). Now granted Derek might play the old bait and switch with the producer and have a girl ready to take Hadley's place and this way he doesn't have to pay the kill fee because the producer gets a girl to shoot his video but how long do you think producers would book girls through an agency that keeps changing the girl they wanted? Of course agents have a lot of power. It's the same thing in the mainstream entertainment industry. Not every agency is the same and not every agent is the same. There is fierce competition and some stars have an advantage over their counterpart if they happen to have a better agent. Same thing in porn except that the agents in many ways have even more power because they know the game far better than most performers. I would also like to point out that if you visit LA Direct than you will see that Hadley is on their main page. Would an agent looking to screw with a performer really bother doing that?
^Your first question: You admit that it wouldn't be hard to get past the kill fee issue. How many times producers would tolerate the switching of performers, I ask you again how many times would he need to set-up a no-show for producers to get word of it and quit trying to book her altogether? I higly doubt it would need to be done even a handful of times. I mean it's a pretty tightly nit business where all the big players know eachother well and keep regular contact. It doesn't take much/long to burn your bridges with them. Your second question: Hadley is a popular up and coming star. Having her on your front page is good publicity regardless of if you want to freeze her with the contract and then push her out.
[Link]
lefaf Deactivated User
5776 Posts 10/14
Posted - May 8 2018 : 12:22AM
hadley is not the only to have issues with derek,adria rae too: [Tweet is no longer available] [Tweet is no longer available]
Actual industry people are talking about that too so not sure why it wouldn't be allowed. [Tweet is no longer available] [Tweet is no longer available]Your logic doesn't take into account Derek's huge ego and "you're going to work either through me or not work at all" mentality. The guy has a tendency to not release models from contracts no matter what and even blocking other agencies from buying them out. There's no logic in such behavior, it's just how he is.
[Link]
local oaf Deactivated User
99 Posts 1/18
Posted - May 9 2018 : 8:20AM
^ Lol yeah, like powerful people choose logic and rational decision making over pettiness and spite. Don't waste your breath arguing with people that say shit like this. He's not even being honest on his own terms.