| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| nateglass Member I must break you 201 Posts 12/05 | I've been a Carpenter fan pretty much since I first saw Halloween. I've now seen all his movies so many times that most of my DVDs are worn out requiring I replace them with new ones and/or Blu Rays. I've bought the region 2 DVDs just to get the Commentaries from Peter Jason and Roddy Piper. I had my wife watch The Thing on our first date so that I could know if our relationship was going to work out. So I'm a bit of a Carpenter mark, and when I saw porn was parodying what I consider to be holy and sacred movies I was a bit nervous. I have just finished watching Smash's Halloween parody and I am prepared to say it's the 3rd or 4th best Halloween movie. It is more watchable than any of the Rob Zombie crap and most of the sequels. The original will always be the best, and I thought H2O was pretty enjoyable. I'd put the Smash parody and Halloween 2 as a pretty close 3rd or 4th. Obviously they are 2 movies that require different settings to watch but I'll watch Lily Labeau's performance over Busta Rhymes any damn day of the week. This is a porn movie, and it's shot on a smaller budget than Hollywood movies so production costs and value are going to be different. That being said, the parts of the movie where the budget constraints show actually only serve to make it more fun to watch. Watch Marcus London's coat sticking out of the door as he drives away. Andy San Dimas blinking while laying dead on the bed. These things just added to my enjoyment of the movie since after all it is a porn parody. When parodying a horror movie you have to walk a thin line between staying true to the scary nature of the source but also keeping the mood light. Jim Powers and Smash do an excellent job of that. I much prefer the lighthearted approach than the mean and cruel remake that Rob Zombie did. The attention to detail is really noticeable here. Smash tried to capture scenes and angles as Carpenter did. The closet scene with Lily Labeau was tremendous. The Shape does his situp perfectly. The head-cocked-to-the-side look at Lynda's impaled boyfriend is good. The first scene set in 1996 kept me looking for things that obviously didn't exist in 1996 and I didn't see any. There's a segment that sort of has a movie-within-the-movie and it's very enjoyable. Obviously the story has to change a wee bit for business reasons. There's no children in this movie so Laurie's babysitter credentials are somewhat diminished, though she still talks to the "kids" who are never seen/heard. Anything involving school is pretty much removed so as to avoid any legal issues. There's also no drug use. Other than that, the story stays pretty true to it's source. I have a few criticisms. I felt that occasionally the shot would linger a bit too long. The best example of this would be Michael's parents who are forced to cheese it up for way too long after his unmasking. Also the shots of Michael in the background were a little over the top in drawing the viewer's attention to the Shape. Those shots from the original still haunt me to this day, did we just see Michael, can't quite make out the features - thus his name given by Carpenter as The Shape. In this version most of those images lose their sting because Michael stands out, the shot is too tight so instead of being in the background, he's practically the centerpiece of the shot. Tough to do these things on a tight budget so I'm probably just nitpicking. The score is also decent, though it would be impossible for any score to top Carpenter's so it's unfair to compare the two. Overall I think this movie is highly enjoyable. The sex is good and you can tell that Jim Powers probably watched Halloween quite a few times in preparing for this task. It doesn't take a shit all over Carpenter's work (yeah I'm lookin at you Rob Zombie), and it's fun to watch. Knowing Carpenter, I rather think he'd enjoy it as well. |
| bono-ONE All-Star Member SAMCRO 8571 Posts 8/00 | After watching/ reviewing the two versions I'd have to give a slight edge to the Smash version as being truer overall to the Halloween movie. A few changes in the Zero version towards the end dragged it down a bit for me. Michael killing the guy in the kitchen and looking at him was crucial in the original version and that is gone here while not in the Smash version. It made total sense to have Laurie and the girls older in the two versions but Lily, Andy, and Lexi just looked younger in the Smash movie so that was closer. The scene with Laurie in the closet is another well known scene that is cut out of the Zero version and not sure why you'd do that. Andy confronting the Shape in the Smash version was a great nod to the original flick and that is gone in the Zero version. I'd have to give James Bartholet a nod over Marcus for their portrayals of Dr. Loomis who does seem a bit obsessed with Michael and James conveys that pretty good and maybe a bit over the top but not in a bad way. The Myers house was definitely better in the Zero version already looking run down at the start of the movie. I also liked in the Smash version how Laurie ends up fucking Michael while in the Zero version it is only the sheriff who actually should have been grieving over the death of his daughter but it doesn't seem he even knew she'd been killed. Having said that the blue lace on Chanel and her scene rocks so I can almost give that a push. Overall both versions have their good points and slight drawbacks but I'd give the nod every so slightly to the Smash version which keeps the girls ages closer I think to what they were in the Carpenter version and one last tip of the scale would be when Michael takes the car and drives off- much closer to the source material in the Smash version. I'd still check out both versions to help you make up your mind and I was glad to have the chance to view both. |
| astroknight Questionable Moderator Tastes so good... 4187 Posts 11/99 | "I do not as a rule seek advice about food from thin people..." - Jeffrey Steingarten |
| udar55 Member 66 Posts 5/06 | Dueling HALLOWEEN porn reviews |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |