| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| M.B. Senior Member 1679 Posts 2/01 | Has anyone seen Kelly's Way To Love? And if so, is it any good? I have not been able to find a review of this title anywhere. I liked Dirty Anal Kelly In Rome #1, but I didn't like #2 (way too many fat, ugly dudes, and homeless looking guys). Any info would be much appreciated. Thanks. [Link] |
| Steve K. Deactivated User 840 Posts 11/01 | |
| dexplorer Member 442 Posts 8/01 | |
| VictoriO Member 379 Posts 8/01 | I have overlooked it, but I found out more info about this film & I may rent it & I may give it a review. Not guaranteed, though!
Olly Vic Sizemore aka "Seu Saht" |
| Steve K. Deactivated User 840 Posts 11/01 | |
| Hardz Member Hell on Earth 877 Posts 6/01 | I was really looking forward to this title, because of the presence of Kelly Stafford. This girl is quite unique, and gets off by pushing the limits of her sexuality (a pornographer's dream girl). I was somewhat disappointed by the camera man's inability to find the best angle of view. The dvd also lacks any extra footage. (shame) I would still recommend you all buy this dvd, but ultimately it was a lost opportunity. |
| Steve K. Deactivated User 840 Posts 11/01 | |
| Hardz Member Hell on Earth 877 Posts 6/01 | The film was DEFINATELY hot, but there lies the problem. I also felt the interview with Kelly should have been done on camera. (this interview was taken from a BUTTMAN magazine back issue). |
| the lone palm New Member LA 3 Posts 12/01 | the combination of kelly & the title (rocco's WTL is a favorite) had me excited weeks before this was released. there are many great moments in the film--in the opening w/ the transsexuals, in the second orgy scene as well, etc. however overall i was disappointed with KWTL. maybe it was the klunky camera work; maybe i've seen sabina more passionate; maybe i was expecting too much--or at least something different from what i got. sometimes it felt awkward because of the editing/camera; other times it felt like the people in it were "performing"--i.e., not "into" it unless the camera was on them. this wasn't prevalent in the film by any means but enough so that it was difficult for me to get into it as well; i ended up fast-forwarding through a lot of it. but this is all very subjective, and i'd still recommend watching it to anyone. therefore i'd be interested to hear what other people think. and i'll probably pick it up again sometime (who knows, i could have just been in a bad mood that night). |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |