[Link]
| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| Electric_Logan Member  384 Posts 6/11 |  Posted - Sep 11 2011 : 1:40PMIt's kind of an experiment, if you like. Sort of an experiment to prove that they can find 100 every day (non-porn, non stripper, non escort) girls willing to have hardcore anal sex whilst being filmed for money... or in some cases for thrills. But anyway, I just like the idea of some guys (maybe pro-am guys) trying to prove that they can find 100 girls willing to have hardcore sex including anal whilst being filmed, knowing full well it'll go on the web. It doesn't have to be spur of the moment or anything like the badly faked 'Her First Anal Sex' either. The guys could advertise this sort of 'job' and interview girls and tell them what will be required of them and then maybe arrange a date to shoot it. Maybe in some cases they'd do it there and then. Also some key rules would be:- - No porno girls, only amateur 'every day' girls for real. - Has to include anal. - Has to include a cum shot at the end, trying to aim for in the ass or a facial but maybe settling for on the tits if the girl is stubborn. I really liked this idea and I'm not sure if anyone has done this. Anyone know? [Link] |
| Electric_Logan Member 384 Posts 6/11 | Posted - Sep 13 2011 : 5:45AM [Link] |
| Cuddly Wombat Senior Member Just another bare bum in the shiower 1739 Posts 12/04 | Posted - Sep 13 2011 : 6:04AM [Link] |
| pat362 Senior Member 10083 Posts 3/10 | Posted - Sep 13 2011 : 10:41AM 1-Let's say for argument sake that you pay these girls 800$ for an anal scene. I think that's a feasible amount for an anal scene so it will cost the producers 80,000$ for 100 girls. That's a lot of money and that's just to pay the performers. You still haven't paid a cameraman, editor, company to transfer to dvd or server time if it's internet only content, all the test needed for those girls to do a porn shoot, studio space, equipment to film those scenes and all other incidentals needed to film porn. 2-Guys or semi-pro guys do not equal the capacity to get wood in front of a camera. The reason why there are only a certain amount of male performer is that unlike the women doing porn. Guys can't fake it. 3-Guys or semi-pro guys that can get wood in front of a camera don't necessarily equal good sexual performer so what you wind up with is a guy that has wood but no one would watch him screw in a light bulb. 4-You can advertise for no porn girls but What you'll get are girls thinking about doing porn or pressured into doing porn but most of these girls are usually strippers or prosties because which every day girl will be willing to have sex on film so that all her friends and family can hear about it? Now the semi-good news for you is that there are already similar things on the net. Take a look at backroom casting couch, exploited college girls and girls do porn. It's not exactly what you describe but it's the closest you'll get. [Link] |
| Cuddly Wombat Senior Member Just another bare bum in the shiower 1739 Posts 12/04 | Posted - Sep 13 2011 : 9:32PM [Link] |
| pat362 Senior Member 10083 Posts 3/10 | Posted - Sep 13 2011 : 10:15PM Only a handfull of the girls that appeared on those 3 sites that I named did more porn after those shoots. It's possible they might have done porn elsewhere but if it was then it was probably some solo cam content. The bulk of the girls that appeared on those sites were amateurs [Link] |
| Electric_Logan Member 384 Posts 6/11 | Posted - Sep 14 2011 : 5:09PM And Wombat, paying pro girls to do it defeats the purpose. It just turns back into professional porn then. Also I know about stuff like back room casting but I've never really liked what I see. A lot of crappy positions and shots is my main gripe. [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |