New Pornstar Interviews - [more]
Introducing Natasha Carter

"Dirty talk is a really big thing for me."
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 532 > HD-DVD beats Blu-Ray for porn?
AuthorPost
Comet Man
Member

Boston
96 Posts
4/01
Posted - Jan 9 2007 : 8:49PM
Interesting and amusing article :-)
http://www.cepro.com/news/editorial/16901.html
Gentleman Jon All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

1881 Posts
6/05
Posted - Jan 9 2007 : 10:10PM
I don't think I've ever watched a digital playground movie yet.

And, oh, here's the link made clickable.

TheLoneGunman
Member

400 Posts
10/03
Posted - Jan 10 2007 : 10:02AM
I've mentioned this in other threads, but the HD-DVD over Blu-ray thing that's now going on with several studios is more an issue of AVAILABILITY than anything else...

HD-DVD replication was available to the studios, while Blu-ray wasn't, so that's why the HD-DVD releases are coming first. I don't think it has anything (at this point) to do with picking one format over the other.

Ramsey
Senior Member

Trina Michaels fan
10332 Posts
10/02
Posted - Jan 10 2007 : 12:14PM
I don't see the point of this battle as long as there aren't cheaper 1080p tv's.
Darth-Morpheous
Deactivated User

1701 Posts
3/02
Posted - Jan 10 2007 : 1:56PM
1080p is a fad. Most probably won't notice the difference between a good 1080i image and 1080p unless you have a screen over 100". Porn in true 1080i will be priceless. I can't wait for Zero Tolerance to come out with some releases. Hopefully the porn industry will be a nail in the coffin of Blu-Ray like it was with Beta.
 
TheLoneGunman
Member

400 Posts
10/03
Posted - Jan 10 2007 : 2:06PM
Exactly. Most people aren't going to be able to distinguish 720p from 1080i, let alone 1080i from 1080p.
pinc_noiz
Deactivated User

758 Posts
6/05
Posted - Jan 10 2007 : 2:55PM
entertaining blog about this here (1080p Does Matter - Here’s When (Screen Size vs. Viewing Distance vs. Resolution))

to me, it's the ability not to resolve any pixel as such: 1080p does matter (although the guide-lines in this blog are somewhat indicative indeed ...)

p_n

tmd5
Member

seika izumi
502 Posts
6/04
Posted - Jan 10 2007 : 7:20PM
Hate to say it but that will never happen with all the PS3's out there. The Ps3 makes a good Blu-Ray player too. If only Sony would quit being stupid and release a remote already..the Controller isn't good enough but does the job.

I first went with HD-DVD and do like it. I just hate the player I own and prefer Blu-Ray over HD-DVD at the moment. It's sad that I prefer the PS3 as a movie player over my Toshiba HD-DVD player. Before I checked out Blu-ray I would have loved it if Blu-Ray just died. Quite stupid I'd say, but now that i've tried Blu-ray I like it quite a bit and do notice a difference in picture quality, but I have a 1080p TV.

I think both formats will be around for quite a long time.

I don't think 1080p is a fad. Most people don't need it, but if I was a consumer in the market for a new TV that costs thousands of dollars and wanted something that'd still be good years from now, i'd be stupid not to get a 1080p TV. Of course, some people only need a standard definition TV and will never ever play Blu-Ray or HD-DVD discs.

el glorioso
Deactivated User

79 Posts
7/05
Posted - Jan 10 2007 : 8:15PM
dont waste money on hd or blue R the future is internet downloads
DrP0rn0
Senior Member

1836 Posts
5/04
Posted - Jan 10 2007 : 11:30PM
In no particular order:

Yes Internet downloads of movies will increase in the next few years, especially as set top boxes that let you watch them on a REAL TV sets begin to appear. Boxes like the recently announced Apple TV.

However, prerecorded media is still king and likely will be for many, many years to come.

As for Bluray dying, let's not forget that it is a technically superior format in several ways, most notably that it has more storage capacity than HD-DVD. Let's also not forget some very important facts. Bluray is not a Sony only product. The Bluray consortium includes Phillips, Panasonic, Apple, Pioneer, LG, Sharp, Mitsubushi, Dell, Warner Brothers, Disney, and more.

Also remember that while Sony designed Beta in a vacuum and lost, they also codesigned the CD standard with Phillips. This design follows those lines and obviously includes the support of many big companies.

This is not to say that HD-DVD isn't also good, or doesn't have big name backing. Indeed the HD-DVD consoritum includes Toshiba, Microsoft, NEC, and Hitachi.

Now what really shocked me was a recent trip to Best Buy. There's a very slick Blu-Ray demo loop, using a Sony player and a Sony XBR 42" panel display. It is very eye catching and stopped me in my tracks to watch it. The resolution and color definition are outstanding.

I went off in search of HD-DVD players and their display. I found one poorly set up demo system that didn't say it was running HD-DVD, but I looked at the player to make sure. It looked good, but not as eye catching. This was likely a set up issue. The only other HD-DVD player in the store was connected to a Samsung display. It wouldn't work with the display.

There may be good news for consumers yet. Initial reports indicated that licensing terms prohibited companies from making hybrid players that would play both formats. I haven't heard much about that recently, but what I *have* read is that a company has just released a chip set that supports both formats. Now, any player using this chip set would need two optical pickups (one for each format) as they are slightly different. This should mean that we'll start seeing universal HD optical disc players. This would be very good IMHO.

Enough tech talk in the porn pool forum.

Dr. P

pinc_noiz
Deactivated User

758 Posts
6/05
Posted - Jan 11 2007 : 3:36AM
+ 1 to DrP0rn0's posting
darkside762000
Member

United Kingdom
91 Posts
3/06
Posted - Jan 11 2007 : 6:03AM
HD-DVD or BluRay?

Neither...wait for Ultra HD.

TheLoneGunman
Member

400 Posts
10/03
Posted - Jan 11 2007 : 11:05AM
Toshiba announced a 51GB HD DVD this week, so storage capacity is no longer an issue.

Digital Playground Joone just confirmed in an interview that Sony REFUSES to allow porn on Blu-ray, so unless they change their stance Blu-ray WILL die as a format.

Ramsey
Senior Member

Trina Michaels fan
10332 Posts
10/02
Posted - Jan 11 2007 : 1:30PM
Say good bye to blu-ray :-)
tmd5
Member

seika izumi
502 Posts
6/04
Posted - Jan 11 2007 : 1:47PM
Blu-Ray dying because of no porn? Yeah right!
 
DrP0rn0
Senior Member

1836 Posts
5/04
Posted - Jan 11 2007 : 1:59PM
I didn't know about Toshiba's announcement. Interesting.

Regarding Sony's stance on porn, that surprises me. Well, not their stance, but their ability to enforce it. What allows them to control content at all? Couldn't porn companies just shoot in HD and engage a duplication house to produce Blu-Ray discs for them? These are honest questions, not rhetorical. Perhaps I should do more research into this, but my first few tries on google only produced old stories about DP having selected Blu-Ray over HD-DVD.

I've read that Beta died because of no porn. I've also read that Beta's recording capacity was only 1 hour on original tapes, so you couldn't fit an entire movie on one tape. That's kind of a big deal.

Consider the market differences of today versus the betamax era. Right now, Sony Pictures owns a vast movie catalog which, presumably, they will only release on Blu-Ray. I think that's also a big deal.

Finally, it seems here like I'm arguing that Blu-Ray will win or something. Truth be told, I haven't studied the market well enough to make a prediction. I'm just offering the evidence that I see, that indicates to me that Blu-Ray is a very strong product. We'll see.

Dr. P

Ramsey
Senior Member

Trina Michaels fan
10332 Posts
10/02
Posted - Jan 11 2007 : 2:00PM
Beta and the more superior Video 2000 died simply because the adult-industry went for VHS.
Darth-Morpheous
Deactivated User

1701 Posts
3/02
Posted - Jan 11 2007 : 4:56PM
This is definately true. If you listen to experts, the porn industry made a vast difference in making the inferior VHS the winner over Beta. Like VHS HD-DVD is cheaper to make. Unlike VHS, HD-DVD's quality is as good or better than the other format. The only real advantage for blu-Ray is that supposedly BD can handle 50Gigs, as opposed to HD-DVDs 35 Gigs. Actually no BD has been able to go up to that # as of yet. Also, HD-DVD has recently made it to 50 gigs with a multilayer disc. I don't think that is much of a big deal anyway. Most people won't throw a tantrum if the special features are on a seperate disc.
Darth-Morpheous
Deactivated User

1701 Posts
3/02
Posted - Jan 11 2007 : 5:03PM
Although I would say that the PS3 is the only thing keeping BD afloat, I don't think it is as much of an advantage as you think. Most PS3s are going to be used solely for playing video games. Most people who have the PS3 don't even know or care about BD and HD-DVD. Also, The HD-DVD add on for the Xbox 360 is selling fairly well. I know that there are a hell of alot more PS3s sold than HD-DVD add ons but unlike PS3, the add ons will all be used to watch HD-DVDs.

Your the only one I've heard so far that said that the quality of Blu-Ray is better than HD-DVD. Only recently have any of the BD releases been up to par with a mediocre HD-DVD release.

I know the HD A1 is very slow and buggy. I have one myself. The good news is that the HD-A2 performs much like a regular DVD player. When Onkyo sells there player and all the chinease companies start coming out with players this year that are going to be sub $400.00, I think that will be the end of blu-Ray.

qz3fwd
Member

141 Posts
1/06
Posted - Jan 12 2007 : 11:49AM
Licensing allows them to control what is and is not pressed on BD. You want to press BD porn-you no get a BD license or we revoke your license and take you to court for breach of contract............
TheLoneGunman
Member

400 Posts
10/03
Posted - Jan 12 2007 : 11:51AM
I'm not sure EXACTLY how it works, but that's why SONY is so obsessed with making Blu-ray work - they own proprietary rights to the format (the way they do with PS games, etc). In other words, no one can release anything on the format without getting their okay (one of the reasons you'll never see UNIVERSAL movies on Blu-ray unless the format "wins" - UNIVERSAL and SONY hate each other).

I also believe that Sony may currently own all Blu-ray replicators...not sure about that.

pinc_noiz
Deactivated User

758 Posts
6/05
Posted - Jan 12 2007 : 3:57PM

With new discs up and coming (both the 51GB single-sided triple-layer HD-DVD one (freely configurable using mixtures of eg. WMV9/HD, Blu-ray, HD-DVD, SD-DVD, DVD-Audio) and the newly TDK-developed 150GB BD-discs (by now in beta form)), with both offering more space/ flexibility of codecs, I'm not too sure which standard I would choose as winner now ... (till recently, I was more on the BD side).

Reading this thread on ADT, and being in the middle of a mail conversation with Meridian Audio (owner of MLP (part of the MPEG standards)), I asked him about his thoughts about pornography on BD (knowing them more then a decade now, I'm not shy to ask ). The funny thing is, they happen to co-work with Thomson-Technicolor a lot: a HD DVD and Blu-ray certified production/ replication company. This is how I'm told there is no hard 'no porn on BD' policy at this time, although the Blu-ray Group is severely discouraging it by making it a hot topic in eg. licencee-meetings (...).

And although there are clearly no porn movies on BD available right now, Blu-ray Group's Compliance Committee itself is very vague in answering questions concerning their allowance of pornographic content on BD. They probably know all to well (...) a 'no porn on BD' policy will severely hinder market-acceptance. And as the BD-standard is own by the Blu-ray Group, having Sony as owner on BD's technical rights 'only', the Group as a whole will have to decide on pornographic content. Soon.

p_n

edit to correct on wrong info

Edited by - pinc_noiz on 1/13/2007 2:16:47 PM

Webmonkey
Member

15 Posts
12/03
Posted - Jan 13 2007 : 3:47AM
The playback of 1080p material in 1080i or 1080p does not make much difference. However, material shot in interlaced is not good. It will results in lots of the well know interlacing problems like combing. The 1/60 intervals between frames will cause motion problems, this has already been shown in sports.

I sure hope that the industry will move to and shoot in 1080p. Until then, 720p will be prefered over 1080i.

In a world without walls and fences - Who needs Windows and Gates???

pinc_noiz
Deactivated User

758 Posts
6/05
Posted - Jan 13 2007 : 11:18AM
Not complaining, but I've a backlog for almost anything I do ... Just now I saw a thread along the lines of "HD-DVD beats Blu-Ray for porn" on an other forum I used to track: some fun (...) reading.

p_n

Edited by - pinc_noiz on 1/13/2007 11:22:06 AM

L
Member

10 Posts
11/06
Posted - Jan 13 2007 : 11:54AM
Blu-ray licenses fees are shared between Sony, Matsushita (Pansonic and JVC), Phillips, and several other companies. MEI and Sony have the lions share, with some estimates I've read putting MEI ahead. Clearly this is not a propriatory technology.
Blu-ray currently have around a dozen titles on the market on BD50s, while HD DVD has a limit of 30Gb at present. Toshiba has stated 51Gb HD DVDs are technically feasible, but hasn't shown these discs to anyone. At the same time last year they announced 45Gb discs which also haven't been shown to anyone. Since they would have to change the HD DVD spec to allow these discs in (and potentially make current players obsolete) there is little likelyhood they will see the light of day.



Jump To: