New Pornstar Interviews - [more]
Tiny Khloe: 2026 Exxxotica Interview

"I’m attracted to people’s intelligence. I like some substance. I want to be able to hold a conversation."
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 665 > How far can they go???
AuthorPost
Mojo
Deactivated User

1223 Posts
9/03
Posted - Nov 10 2004 : 5:15AM
Now that we've started seeing things like DAPs, I was wondering what could be next; how can they top that and what the physical limits are in having sex? I personally believe that we've seen everything that's possible, but what happens when even DAPs get stale, what can the producers do to top that?!
Mr. Peter
Member

423 Posts
11/03
Posted - Nov 10 2004 : 12:18PM
Obviously the DAP will be replaced by TAP and DPP will be replaced with TPP,....and then QAP and QPP, and so on and on...(:-)) till the holes would be big enough to move there, lol.

Do you really think that there is any limits?
Im starting to forget about limits...

Zartyr
Member

700 Posts
7/04
Posted - Nov 10 2004 : 12:30PM
edit to delete/ misread "to top that" as "to stop that"

Edited by - Zartyr on 11/10/2004 12:31:06 PM

Skeeter Kerkove
Member

967 Posts
2/03
Posted - Nov 10 2004 : 1:37PM
Lee O
Forearm Trainer

mmmmmmm........ after-birth
1193 Posts
8/03
Posted - Nov 10 2004 : 2:18PM
Not sure how all the men are supposed to fit around a girl for triple let alone quadruple but I think we're probably just about at the limits right now . Remember back in the 80's when fake tits got bigger and bigger ? Seems to me that a similar sort of thing is happening with multiple rods in holes . Most guys lost interest once the breasts looked too fake , my guess is a similar thing will play out with maximum man meat . The guys who just want to watch guys can keep watching , and for those who enjoy seeing the woman occasionally amongst all that man flesh will follow a different path .

There is still passion , beautiful women , and the great outdoors you know . Maybe if that's become stale then there's a problem ?

 
-Kelly-
Senior Member

2517 Posts
5/03
Posted - Nov 10 2004 : 2:28PM
Maybe they'll actually go the reverse and revert back to light one-on-one sex.

My God. I'm delusional.

Mojo
Deactivated User

1223 Posts
9/03
Posted - Nov 11 2004 : 5:32AM
That's exactly what I was thinking when I wrote this thread. How the hell are 3+ guys supposed to get behined a girl in order to get it in?! As far as I can see it's impossible.
tynian2001
Member

67 Posts
5/03
Posted - Nov 11 2004 : 10:01AM
I'm not so sure that this is "delusional". I'll admit that it's probably unlikely, but I for one would be glad to see some titles that back away from the circus stunts that are all the rage now in favor of more scenes with genuine chemistry between the participants. I know that there are a few performers out there (God bless them) that can perform these acts in the midst of a hot scene, but it seems that a lot of the performers that are doing DAP, DPP, etc., aren't really into the acts that they're performing. Better by far, IMHO, would be the same hot performers really enjoying what they're doing ot at the very least being able to more accurately portray the role of someone who is enjoying what they're doing.

Or maybe I'm just delusional too.

Zartyr
Member

700 Posts
7/04
Posted - Nov 11 2004 : 11:57AM
I had forgotten - or rather stopped hoping I would see this in a porn-movie - how hot it is, until I came across "Constance" from Innocent Pictures.

Katja Kean was actually looking at her partner and - sit down before you proceed reading - NOT looking into the camera, during a whole scene.

On the day I was watching "Constance" I had also rented "Riot Sluts" and I still cannot decide which movie is hotter, the nearly softcore "Constance" or the reportedly hard gonzo "Riot Sluts".

Edited by - Zartyr on 11/11/2004 11:58:58 AM

-Kelly-
Senior Member

2517 Posts
5/03
Posted - Nov 11 2004 : 12:36PM
Hey, how's it going,

I mentioned what I mentioned because that is truly what I would like to see. I just don't realistically think it will happen unless the homogenized/circus act gonzo stops selling well. I think the market will dictate what happens and if pornographers feel that softer, more authentic stuff is what people want maybe they'll give it to us (Fusxion, Lex Drill, Acid Rain...all these gonzo fronts formed because they said "this is what the modern consumer wants") I just don't see them getting the message that chemistry and not debauchery is the true thing porn fans crave because I don't think the sales will go down significantly enough.

This is just the nature of a free market: something successfull will be imitated to death until it has lost any real meaning and saturation will be achieved. There are quite definitely girls working today who probably don't really enjoy the stuff they feel they have to do because it is the current nature of the biz (at the same time, there are plenty of girls who probably love it...this way they get their money for a short amount of work as opposed to getting the same amnt. of money for standing around on sets waiting for lighting and learning lines with no extra compensation) And the Vince Vouyer's and Stoney Curtis' who make sure to have the girls look straight into the camera and spout offensively forced dirty talk ain't helping, especially when they do it to new girls who then don't know any better and think that is what they are supposed to do in porn scenes. Gonzo is all fine and good but too much of it is a bad thing. If I were to watch a feature film and the two performers actually looked authentically into eachother, like Devinn Lane always does, I would find that incredibly sexier than any monotonous anal, DP, DAP, DPP scene in a Red Light/Platinum X-imitated gonzo tape since so often the performers doing those scenes look about as excited as typical Eurogirls.

We've got anal. We've got DP. We've got both Double anal and Double vag. We've got gangbangs. We've got 50 Man Cream Pies. We've got widespread overemphasis on Interracial and shitty POV films. We've got veiled bukkake in "Baker's Dozen." We have the actual thing in JM's "American Bukkake" series. We've got rough sex that makes some of that old Extreme stuff (not the Federal 5) look antiquated. We've got more and more specialized fetish series, such as the recent camel toe videos.

Individually, these things aren't necessarily bad. However, it all amounts to a constant upping of the ante and outdoing the other guy or copying what the other guy did and sold well with. Sexually, I don't know where they can go from here, hence the comical dicussion earlier about how the hell three guys could "fit in there". I think it would be better to actually cut back and focus more and authentic product. It ain't gonna happen though because it is not clear that this is what the majority of us want. I imagine we are in the minority.

Kelly

Edited by - tscfan317 on 11/11/2004 1:02:24 PM

Huggins293
Member

608 Posts
5/04
Posted - Nov 17 2004 : 1:50PM
I don't know dude, I watched Riot sluts with Jole and I was shocked. It did not turn me on. Actually I thought it was too bizarre for my tastes. I stick with the vanilla Vivid and JKP as my porn base.
Huggins293
Member

608 Posts
5/04
Posted - Nov 17 2004 : 1:53PM
What I don't get is why performers who do traditional oral sex and penetration are seeing automatically as boring. I don't think DP, anal or gangbang makes a film hotter or more boring, it is how it is shot and the attitude behind the action.
Zartyr
Member

700 Posts
7/04
Posted - Nov 17 2004 : 3:47PM
Since I wrote "reportedly"; I do not even consider "Riot Sluts" to be a rough movie.
It is a hot, passionate, erotic and sometimes even "romantic" experience, which shows rough sex.

But I was shocked too ;-), finding a scene which reminded me of Ninn's "Shock" in a gonzo in particular, and shocked in general that my distaste for gonzos would have nearly cost me the pleasure to view this gem of porn of the last years, which many very likely will name a milestone of the adult genre in lets say about 10 years from now.

And what was too bizarre? I mean this movie did not have any circus acts. (I personally would have enjoyed a Euro version with actual chain-bondage of Arianna Jollee).

I find the usual gonzo formula of a gathering of people who are going to fuck each others brains out at least as "bizarre".
And what tops the bizarrity of all bizarrities is, in usual gonzos they gather in million dollar houses but wear clothing so cheap, you would get evicted in the most sleaziest club or house in the trailer-trash ghetto.
Now this is what I call bizarre.

BTW, I normally stick with Private, Dorcel, Colmax, IFG, various Italian studios, Studio A and AlexD and enjoy one or the other Adam&Eve, Digital Playground and Vivid movie from over the pond as well.

M vanHouten
Member

183 Posts
3/04
Posted - Nov 17 2004 : 4:31PM
Ha ha ha. So true...
bigbuttlover
Member

Los Angeles
253 Posts
4/03
Posted - Nov 17 2004 : 6:48PM
I wish the next step in porn would be dirty anal sex. A anal theme without cleaning would be damn hot.
 
KatjaKassin
Senior Member

1257 Posts
5/03
Posted - Nov 17 2004 : 8:27PM
maybe we don't top dap. maybe the next step will be hot passionate sex and everybody get's paid only after the girl had a least 4 real orgasms on camera.
RoccoVR
Member

279 Posts
11/04
Posted - Nov 17 2004 : 8:50PM
Interactive/customized compilations, customized porn will be the new frontier I think.

As dvd technology gets better and cheaper, you could easily see larger compilations, where studios open up an entire series of scenes to consumers.

A "What do you want to see in the film" type of thing where reviewers pay to have things added, after reviewed approval, or for free if they buy the compilation. Maybe for say $100.

Imagine if you could submit a sexy line one of your favorite pornstars say. Or what she changes into, or how she performs.

The ideas could be grouped together into a compilation, made either interactive...like which of the 50 clothing items do you want to see her wearing, etc. Which of the phrases do you want to hear her say during sex, etc.

Or could be a compilation of completed scenes based on various ideas.

I think the future of porn will be more consumer oriented, which will make it better.

Like being able to check a box when the dvd loads to include or exclude, gaping, dap.....or to setup the order you want the events in. Shit like that.

I don't know I just made all this up. Who knows.

Edited by - rocco on 11/17/2004 8:51:52 PM

Zartyr
Member

700 Posts
7/04
Posted - Nov 18 2004 : 1:09PM
This is the same BS as the pizza with customer-selected add-ons.
On pizza it may work, but in a "normal" restaurant?

It is the fucking job of the cook to create a delicious meal by himself, I am not going to do his part of job.
And if it does not fit my tastes I'll search for another restaurant.

The same goes mutatis mutandis for producers/directors/artists.

f_strongbad
Deactivated User

Scandinavia
141 Posts
5/04
Posted - Nov 18 2004 : 1:22PM
Well, that will happen when you actors get paid in flowers
capitalism as collapsed

(I Just love the energy you put in all your scenes!!)

oatmeal
Meat Popsicle

Seeking Beauty
1738 Posts
8/04
Posted - Nov 18 2004 : 1:42PM
Wouldn't that be novel? Stopping the gynecological stunt work and actually get down to some good sex.
lordasmus
Member

439 Posts
2/03
Posted - Nov 18 2004 : 5:31PM
What for a wonderful remark Katja - I love you for this comment! I regret never have met you.
For sure I would buy every move in the manner you specify. Kind regards!
Lord Asmus

DavidK126
Member

79 Posts
4/04
Posted - Nov 18 2004 : 10:51PM
I totally agree with this. Basically, the next frontier could be extreme trashiness focusing on the various substances that girls' bodies produce.
Mr. Peter
Member

423 Posts
11/03
Posted - Nov 19 2004 : 12:20PM
Thats maybe true. But then it can also happen that porn actors will be paid less because there will be much more talents who will want to make money.
Because it will be easirer to make romantic passionate sex than performing daps w/o condoms etc.
Kperv
The Cuddler

*struck
(She slipped)

1818 Posts
1/04
Posted - Nov 19 2004 : 3:18PM
Physically and possibly emotionally easier. Easier as in less taxing that is. Not easier as in without difficulty.
Not that many performers of either gender have shown themselves capable of convincingly portraying passion.
KatjaKassin
Senior Member

1257 Posts
5/03
Posted - Nov 21 2004 : 4:24PM
I disagree!!!
 
AC Cream
Deactivated User

1066 Posts
5/04
Posted - Nov 21 2004 : 5:11PM
Wouldn't that be nice. I miss the good old days when the females being pleased was a major part of Porn(back in the middle to late 90's). The only person I can think of that still does it that way is Sean Michaels, but he gets criticized for being boring and not pushing his films farther like everybody else.

****Katja, don't assume you know somebody's feelings or beliefs from 1 opinion or what part of the US they are from.****

AC Cream

Mienhagen
aka Shameless deactivated again

Europe
696 Posts
6/04
Posted - Nov 27 2004 : 7:31AM
Sandra Romaun gets more than 4 real orgasms on camera doing DAP, Katja. If you dont get them, thats a pity. But I still hope you enjoy them (and the money you get for it), too.
I really do think TAP is the new frontier. And I am 100% convinced girls like Sandra are able to truely come to that too.

On the other hand, I do understand Katjas statement about passionate 1on1 sex. I think once upon a time there will be a backlash. First, however, we will reach TAP and more BDSM hardcore porn.

pippa_hh6
Member

UK
11 Posts
3/04
Posted - Nov 28 2004 : 6:49AM
It seems to me that the future of porn is completely in the hands (mouths, genitals) of the performers, directors and studios.
I think we're all tired of the suck / fuck / cum routine with no more than neanderthal gruntings from the performers,
and that gonzo directions can be very demeaning for the performers, especially the girls.
Sure, I'm not expecting a Shakespearean performance, but the very best scenes are (to me) those where the performers talk about what
they're doing as they do it - what they want to do and how much they're enjoying it.

Consider scene 4 of the classic 'Lex the Impaler'; here 2 English girls relish the attentions of Lex and his black whopper,
urging each other on to further debauchery.

Likewise the last scene of RLDs excellent 'Cum Swapping Sluts #6' which has some of the hottest ever anal and A2OGM I've seen.
But it could have been even better with lots more dialog. Rather than the off-screen directions to share the cum with the other girl, they
should have talked about what they planned to do, urging each other on and really relishing the act.

Yes, we all really enjoy porn, but we'd all enjoy it a whole lot more if we were more convinced the performers were enjoying it too.

The higher the heels, the sexier the girl!

nietzsche
Deactivated User

5470 Posts
8/03
Posted - Nov 28 2004 : 8:15AM
Fisting is the wave of the future. Let us embrace it.
Zartyr
Member

700 Posts
7/04
Posted - Nov 28 2004 : 9:06AM
What we will get will be maybe more shitty wannabe pseudo-SM, but in no way BDSM.
You think $I_just_grabbed_a_digital_camera_so_call_me_director will be able to capture (sexual) energy, heat, passion, romance, whatever just because they discover BDSM?

Fact is that a good production staff (director, editor, etc.) somehow have the ability to make extreme stuff or circus acts not look like "sick".
The rising number of $I_just_grabbed_a_digital_camera_so_call_me_director would would also make a vaginal missionary position look like "sick".

OTOH, many people seem to be fond of this cheap stuff, when I look on the place occupied by unwatchable american gonzo, german wall-to-wall sex flicks, and german goo and urine themed DVDs in video stores.
Probably the same people who then complain about this "sick stuff, because it is really easy to avoid this stuff and look out for movies with higher production value.

Mienhagen
aka Shameless deactivated again

Europe
696 Posts
6/04
Posted - Nov 28 2004 : 12:20PM
Now this holds some real truth for me, too!
...but just TAP her, please!
Assanova
Member

balls deep
296 Posts
1/04
Posted - Nov 28 2004 : 4:52PM
Allowing sex in bondage videos is probably the last step IMO. Everythings been done.

Frankly I'd like to see the end, or at least the decline of all the freakshow stuff that's been going on. I never even understand the point of gaping. The main enticement of anal is that the hole is so tight. When a girl gapes huge, it's not tight anymore so what's the appeal?

So many scenes have become endurance tests and nothing more. You might as well call porn an extreme sport because alot of the passion and eroticism has gone out of it.

I'm not complaining mind, because as long as Jules Jordan, Brian Xin, Staliano, and Leslie keep using the kind of women and getting the hots I love, I'll keep paying.

Endless Loop
Senior Member

Tomatometer
1129 Posts
8/04
Posted - Nov 28 2004 : 8:31PM
Sooner or later, be it fisting, pissing, or triple highwire routines, reliance on capturing simple decadent acts, in order to turn the buck, will cease, as movie selections being released weekly, are already showing the signs of monotanous desperation.
Like an evaporating watering hole, the slowdown in daring new shocking acts has arrived, and IMO will slowly draw the local inhabitants in, to fight it out to survive on what left.

Instead of continuing on this narrowing road to greater extremities, and farther away from the center of mainstream tastes, a studio would probably be better off, polishing a genre of choice. One that offers its talent, sufficient diversity to please a distinctive audience, and securing a solid base, against what could become a marauding competitive marketplace.
This, until as another thread had discussed, Technology, or other advancement in the medium, presents itself, and opens a door to some new stimulating possibility for the industry as a whole.

I would think it likely, that those who can adapt through raw creative ability, and maintain a loyal following, would best make it through to the next rainy season.

Well, along with a scarcity of those opportunists, extremely lucky, and equally ravenous.

Edited by - Endless Loop on 11/28/2004 8:34:43 PM

nietzsche
Deactivated User

5470 Posts
8/03
Posted - Nov 29 2004 : 1:49AM
fisting, fisting, fisting. That's what I'm trying to say, man.
Endless Loop
Senior Member

Tomatometer
1129 Posts
8/04
Posted - Nov 29 2004 : 4:14AM
The attraction with anal?

Maybe its a kind of a "Cinderella factor", that makes such a potentially foul act, so mesmerizing, and altogether appealing.
Typically the pussy, widely known to be an instument of tease, is the recipient of a lionshare of attention, that includes all the care, and loving devotion it could want throughout a lifetime, while basically performing the arguably overrated function, as sombodys once used doorway into this place. Otherwise, it does little more, than make a feeble attempt at directing piss.
This, while whining incessantly bloody murder, and being indirectly responsible for wreaking monthly havoc on all
the lives, to whom they enslave.
Sure sounds like spoiled evil stepsisters, taking after evil stepmothers to me.

Then we have the admoniished and reserved other sister.
The backdoor embarrassment. Who's forever locked away, never to be seen, much less heard, cast forever, as the disgraceful simpleton. While recieving little regard for her diligent work, she performs her duties to often unseen perfection, managing all the dirtiest chores, and taking nothing but hand-me-downs in return.
In society, hers is a place that lies beneath them all.

Just like in Cinderella.

Anal lovers are simply seeking to find out if their slipper fits.

"Cumfarts are fleeting, deep ACP's are forever"




Jump To: