Yes yes, please....the hotter the girls the better, young, curvy, sexy, nice eyes, beautiful, hot pussy lips...great sucker, looker....but what about the man that is getting off with her. I enjoy seeing hot girls, then seeing my favorite studs do the work. I get dissapointed if it is a lame stud, small cock, whatever. I have 5 or 6 stud cocks I like best to do the fucking. Do you? and if so, why and who? The guys do make a difference to me. Do they to you or don't you care?
The guy is just as important to making the scene a success, even if he's not the reason we buy the movie. I would think that's obvious. Equally obvious, the more the guy treats his partner in a manner consistent with how I would treat her, the better I like it.
Very. There was a time when I'd have said it doesn't matter but I've seen way too much bad porn for that now and have narrowed many of the biggest problems in the worst porn down to coming directly from them having used the wrong guy.
I think the guy is very imporatnt and that is why I often find that a scene that could have been hot winds up being bland and lacking in chemistry. I applaud guys that can use their equipment with such talent but I don't just watch porn to see a dick going into a woman's orrifice. I need to see some kind of interaction between him and the female and that requires more than that the guy have a bick dick that stays hard. Take a John Leslie, Jamie Gillis, Ron Jeremy and almost any player from the golden age of porn and compare them to almost every male today and tell me that todays guys don't pale in comparaison to those guys.
[Link]
screwcap Deactivated User
I'm walkin' here........ 1032 Posts 6/10
Posted - Aug 8 2010 : 11:33AM
SC disclosure. When I buy my porn, I look at the male cast first. I'll be dammed if i buy some DVD pencil dick/bean sprout guy screwing even the hotest porn starlet. naaah. gotta have jumbo salami.
I want to see the job done well and the female really getting it in the hope you may see a natural reaction that you can't mask or cover up,,,well something like that.
All important to making a good scene. He must be there, in the moment, present and involved with his partner. He is my surrogate and I bought the movie because I thought the girl was hot. He is to confirm my belief. The criteria I've read studios use to select males, the ability to get hard on command in the absence of any outside stimulus, work directly against the attitude I'd prefer a male to exhibit. Refraining from making full penetration to show the penis entire length is valued by producers in a male performer but too much drains the heat out of a scene and gives the appearance that the male is amateurishly rabbit fucking. I place a high value on a guy who can pull out and cum minus all the self abuse. Justin Slayer's WCP is great at showing the bare minumum og jerking, Prince Yasura, CJ Wright comes immediately to mind, although CJ is becoming a little too circusee for my taste . I've only seen one movie with Marco Banderas but from post here he seem to be the kind of guy I like to watch.
[Link]
purgatori Deactivated User
202 Posts 6/10
Posted - Aug 8 2010 : 1:13PM
It's pretty important to me that there is no guy f---ing 'the girl.'
The guy is never a reason to buy a DVD. He could be a reason not to buy a DVD (if I really can't stand him, such as Rocco Siffredi). Having said that in my opinion the guy is as important as the girl. What's most important is that there is chemistry, everyone's comfortable with what they're doing and there's just the right amount of dirty talk. The mechanical side of sex by itself leaves me rather unaffected.
No matter what size the tits are....play with them.... 732 Posts 12/08
Posted - Aug 8 2010 : 7:26PM
Even though I'm a guy, there are a set of male performers I prefer to watch. I think it's because they do things the way I would do to the girl if I was in his position. Other posters are right there must be chemistry between them, afer all a bad performing working girl always blames her tool.....
Lately I've been leaning towards porn with thin guys, who are rare in porn. Even if they start thin, they usually build up huge muscles (or giant fat bellies) and look ridiculous with the generally tiny women of porn.
[Link]
purgatori Deactivated User
202 Posts 6/10
Posted - Aug 9 2010 : 1:48AM
Yup. Scenes with thin guys, while still not as good as scenes with no guys at all, are much preferable to scenes with hulking lummoxes (for me, at least). Maybe its because I can relate to these guys _somewhat_ more readily, or perhaps its just a case of preferring a greater deal of inter-performer symmetry (as I too, agree that these huge guys with petite women just looks ridiculous/wrong). Anetta Keys is one of the few performers I know of who has filmed b/g scenes predominantly with men of slender build.
reminds me of an old joke. "I bet i can prove your gay." "Really how?" "When you watch porn do you prefer the guy fucking the girl to have a small dick or a nice big fat cock."
+1 I think the hysterical avoidance of the male performer in so much "straight" porn nowadays is one of the reasons it has lost some of the chemistry and eroticism of older flicks where things seemed a bit more egalitarian in this respect. In short, the guy is just as important as the girl, and I do not see the man as simply a "stunt cock" - if that's the way it's being handled, I will likely not be too keen on the scene. Of course, that depends on who the dude is, and with such scarcity of magnetic, charismatic male performers around today, I guess it's natural that they're not a huge part of the scene (the stand out performers tend to get a bit more screen time and enjoy a higher level of humanization).
I'm with most other people on the board so far. The guys are just as important as the girls for me. Cock size, hardness, passion, communication, quality and quantity of cum shots, the ability to position themselves and the girls for the camera: all of these things add up to make me believe that they want the girl they're fucking as much as I do. The fact that these guys fuck hot girls for a living means the few who manage to convince me get a nod of appreciation here: Manuel Ferrara and Mark Ashley are at the absolute top of the game for 1 on 1 scenes, Steve Holmes and Eric Everhard are perhaps the best DP combo in the biz, and James Deen and Jerry are probably the best of the new kids I've seen. Thanks guys! Apologies to anyone I've left out - I've almost exclusively watched RLD, Platinum X, Evil Angel and JJV for the last 10 years.
I would agree with everything you said, especially about the guy being in the moment. It isn't as fun to watch if the guy is acting like a robot, is a complete jerk, has trouble performing, or is simply going through the motions. I prefer there to be some real chemistry there, although I do think chemistry can vary sometimes. I prefer guys that don't always control the scene though, or who generally "show-off" women well in their scenes. Unfortunately too many of today's studs think the scene is more about them, or the females are simply too submissive to take an active role or be spontaneous. There are some guys that I do generally try to avoid, but the right girl is usually always watchable to me. I do also agree that guys, who can fuck-to-completion, are a bonus to me.
[Link]
Clams Deactivated User
173 Posts 12/10
Posted - Dec 13 2010 : 5:06PM
I wish they would get a stunt girl to handle the oral. Cannot look at dudes face.
I don't really have any favorite male performers, and I don't care about dick size. But still the guy is very important in that there are certain ones I know to avoid: the ones who talk too much, the abusive & misogynist ones, the ones who like to spit, the distractingly ugly/hairy/old/musclebound/skinny/fat/tattooed ones, the ones who can't generate any chemistry with the girls, etc. Overall, a guy can't make a scene for me, but he can certainly ruin one.
It may be predictable, but for me there's nothing that beats a pretty little 18 year old white girl getting shared around at least half a dozen very big dicked and well built black guys. It maximises the sense of domination, which many of the girls clearly enjoy too. The contrast of a cute, pale skinned white girl with a huge, hard black dick in every hole is just too good. Edited by - teengangbangfan on 12/13/2010 7:01:44 PM
It's a lot easier for a bunch of guys to bang one lady well, than it is for one guy to do all the work. And I have to agree with you that a bunch of guys usually bang their sexy lady a lot harder and a lot better than one guy can ever do. The lady needs at least two guys for a good DP. But I'd say that for anal sex with the ladies, uncircumcised studs often do better. Because their loose skin around the cock reduces their friction for the lady's ass. A part of the way with each stroke, the guy rubs his cock against his own foreskin rather than against the wall of the lady's rectum. And this reduced friction for the lady often allows harder and faster anal sex for her without making her uncomfortable. Steve Holmes is one such uncircumcised guy. And Mick Blue is another. They are my favorite porn studs. During anal sex, you often can't see whether the guy is circumcised or not. You really have to look hard to notice that Steve Holmes and Mick Blue are uncircumcised. But you can see the difference in how hard and how fast they can bang the nice lady's ass without making her uncomfortable.
Well I never bought a movie because any particular guy was in it, but I'll avoid flicks that feature dudes I know I don't like. Its better if the girl is actually into the guy.
Not sure if that proves they're gay, or simply like to fantasize that they're the guy with the big tool having his way with the porn chick. In my case, I pick porn based on the male performers and sex acts in the DVD. But then I'm bi.
I could care less who the guy is so long as he stays quiet, doesn't spit on the girl, and just does the job properly. If the guy talks and moans more often and louder than the girl to the point where you can barely hear her, then that's a big problem. There's a small list of male performers who I avoid like the plague because of this or other issues. The one's I prefer don't really talk, help the scene along nicely, and just do a great job without making you really notice them. The last thing I want to hear during a cumshot is the guy moaning like a dying donkey. That ruins everything.
Chemistry---I'll make note of it in my reviews. James Deen tends to be the guy I mention whether it's with Jenna Haze or Lisa Ann or the lovely April O'Neil or whomever.
I avoid certain guys due to the annoyance factor. And the huge cock guys seem to have some major downside which negates the huge cock IMO, so I mostly avoid them except in highly-rated (by fans) scenes. The early Ron Jeremy is one guy I would watch regardless of the girl; he was a professional and understands about what the fan wants to see and how the camera sees and he keeps himself out of the way while still delivering a great performance. Today's guys seem to not have that sort of awareness. Or maybe it's the fault of the cameraman/director who (presumably) are supposed to take care of those details.
That the girl enjoy working with the guy is all that's important to me. Because when the girl likes the guy, the scene is going to be a lot more spontaneous, behavior wise. For instance, I know that the girls love working with Manuel, Mark Ashley, Scott Nails, Michael Stefano, Ian Scott, Alex Gonz, James Deen, Criss Strokes and Mark Wood; I've heard them mentioned enough times in interviews as favorites that I know when they're in a scene with a girl that the scene is going to be at least mildly strokeworthy. If the guy wasn't important then we would all be watching Georgia Jones plucking her chicken instead of Katie St. Ives getting her peeper pumped.
It's imperative to have the right male doing a scene. First of all his performance has to be on par with that of the female performer with whom he's working. That would not only include appearance, although that's important, but spontanaety and enthuasism. He is a foil for the female performer and without the correct chemistry between the two, even the best of females are unable to fuly develop themselves during a scene. Edited by - wardqueenjanine on 12/17/2010 3:01:58 PM
Posted - Aug 7 2010 : 6:05PM
