I was wondering how many men in minimal for a gang bang of a girl? Somewhere I heard that it has to be 5 to be a real gang bang. Personally I don't consider it a gang bang unless there are at least the 5. Three or four is just a girl having sexy with a few guys. Also, how man guys is too many??? I love tho see it in the 15 - 25 guy range! But is more better? I think it is the way it is filmed also? Any feedback would be good to see what others are thinking. Nakedguy
I'd say three guys, and simultaneous engagement with at least two, is a minimum. Jennifer Luv did three guys sequentially in one video, as I recall, but she never entertained more than one at a time. Did she do a gangabang? No, IMHO, though it was a pretty good scene.
This is correct. Three guys is considered a "mini" gangbang. 5 or more is a regular gangbang. My preference is the 10-20 range, much like what occurred in The Gangbang Girl series. I think more than 25 gets to be a problem. The big problem with a gangbang movie with 30,40, or 50 guys is that the viewer might only see the girl take a few of the cumshots and the rest are edited out. I've seen that happen too much. That really sucks.
If the girl is not having sexy with at least all three, then in MO it is NOT at all a gang bang. I still think it has to be a minimal of 5 all at the same time. Nakedguy
I would have to say 5 at the least for it to be considered a gangbang. 4 guys is good too but the odd 5th person is what makes it a gangbang in my opinion. There is no limit to how many guys a woman can do in a gangbang, whether it's 5 or 500000 it's still a gangbang. Of course the more men the nastier, and more appealing in my case.
[Link]
kantabcd Deactivated User
167 Posts 5/09
Posted - Jan 4 2010 : 2:10PM
Edited by - kantabcd on 2/14/2010 1:57:07 AM
[Link]
NewRomancer Deactivated User
under THEIR avatar 738 Posts 7/08
Posted - Jan 4 2010 : 2:42PM
"How many men is minimal for a gang bang?" Me! (Funny thing is, that's also my maximum!)
I am totally with you on this one. It has to be at least 5 or to me it is not even a gang bang. And to me the more appealing it is, and more of a fantasy. I would love to see a really good, lets say 75 men gang bang on just one girl, doing everything as nasty as possible, but would hope it is filmed good. Sometimes the girl just doesn't seem into it, or the filming of it is just poor. If one of the main gang bang makers did it, it would be totally amazing!!! Imagine one poor gilr doing every nasty and filty thing with 75 guys. But i am be asking too much. I would settle for a 50 guy or even 30 if the production was good, and the girl seems into it. Bobbi Starr, are you listening??? Imagine beautifull Bobbi doing this??? Nakedguy
The various Gangland DVDs from Devil's Film usually only have 3 guys and they're categorised as gang bangs. I'd agree that 5 seems more like a gang bang to me, but I'm happy as long as the girl goes airtight at some point. I'm not normally someone who hassles performers to do anal, but a gang bang without DP just doesn't seem right to me.
^ yeah, gangbang's without anal aren't gangbangs to me. just a a bunch of dudes having sex with one girl...which is the definition of a gangbang I guess. haha. a gangbang to ME should have anal and DP's at least. that's just my opinion. Gangbangs are one of the ultimate forms of debauchery in my opinion. They should have more than regular, standard sex in them. edit for punctuation. Edited by - chodemasterj on 1/13/2010 7:31:34 PM
Three guys is just a foursome. I've always seen a gangbang defined as at least 5 guys, and I agree -- there needs to be more cocks than the girl can take at once. There needs to be more than enough guys so that some have to "wait their turn" for a hole to fuck.
Totally agree!! Also i want to note that we should thank these pretty girls for allowing this done to them and for it to be taped for our enjoyment!! I am waiting for a new 25 man gang bang with a really pretty starlet? Nakedguy
It needs to be atleast 4 GUYS i think. If i saw a vid with 3 guys and a girl I'd just call it a foursome.
[Link]
Not Lucy Lee (Fake Account) Deactivated User
Liberté, Egalité, Sexualité! 355 Posts 9/14
Posted - Feb 22 2015 : 10:22AM
3 guys is minimum and perfect because all guys can fuck girl at same time, in pussy, ass and mouth. But in big gangbangs and bukkakes you see guys in line or circle waiting and jerking.
I agree that in a gangbang the girl needs at least 3 cocks to fill her up, but with more she can use her hands too or even suck many cocks at the same time. My minimum is 4 but as long as she actively uses the extras, perfect for me is 5 or 6.
Words can mean anything you want them to mean. That's why the meaning of words changes over time from one generation to another. And over many generations, languages change so much that they are no longer the same languages that they used to be before. The meaning of words isn't so much about logic as it is about how people normally use them at the present time. I don't think you can find a porn film that uses the word 'gangbang' for a 3 on 1. I don't even know of any porn film that uses this word for a 4 on 1. Perhaps 5 on 1 is the lower limit for a scene to be called a gangbang. Of course, if people start using this word in a different way, and this usage becomes popular. Then the meaning of the word 'gangbang' will change, and it will no longer mean the same thing as it means now. Edited by - Dan on 2/27/2015 6:48:17 PM
Five, absolute minimum. Then again, is it quality or quantity that makes a good gangbang?
[Link]
StarGrek Deactivated User
Under the moonlight. 1763 Posts 10/11
Posted - Mar 1 2015 : 9:05AM
At least 4. And there is a reason about that. 3 dicks have the potential to be sexually active (one in each hole, mouth, pussy, ass). So we need at least one more for substitution.
Good point. The only places where I can recall having seen fewer than five guys referred to as a gangbang are tube sites, where it's not uncommon to find a 2v1 called a gangbang. Oh, and that West Coast Gangbangs site, where Jenni Lee, to name one, did three guys simultaneously. (Not that great a scene; I sure wish she'd done the same thing for a better company.) It's interesting to me that, even in the heyday of the gangbang, the mid-00s, some prominent girls were okay with 2v1s and 3v1s but apparently drew the line at three. Monica Sweetheart, for example, did a lot of two- and -three-guy scenes and surely must have had the opportunity to do more than three guys at once, yet I'm pretty sure that she never did.
It occurred to me that could be a new series--One Man Gang Bang. One cocksman penetrates a star in her mouth, pussy and anus several times over. Repeat for five scenes, different star each scene. I'm surprised no one has thought of it sooner. Or have they? ______________________________________________________________________
"There he goes talking about that Hypnosis thing again."
What Jennifer did is usually called a train, not a gang bang. However, depending on how it goes down a train can be harder on someone than a gang bang, at least a gang bang they all aren't using the same orifice (other than the circus acts where the objective is to get as many dicks in the same orifice as possible), spreading out the wear and tear on the body.
I remember Jenni Lee, she was the talent booker for Kink in the mid 2000's. I knew she did a few scenes for Kink but how in the hell did she find time to work for other companies like West Coast? She was reasonably attractive and must have liked to do scenes for her to seek them out while making six figures at Kink working for owner Peter Acworth (this was before Peter took on more exclusively a management role in the company). I wonder if she is still alive and doing well.
What about Shayla LaVeaux in "Starbangers 11"? To me a magnificent scene considering how many guys she does with her pussy, ass, mouth and hands and not once but twice changing the original guys to a different group doing her. Has there ever been a more beautiful gang-bang film in the history of porn? I am prejudiced of course in favor of Shayla but I sure do not think anyone else has done as well in this sort of production. Now we have to find a young lady trying to duplicate Shayla's monumental "work", any suggestions? And how about the newbie joining in a gang-bang with Shayla to boot. Yowza
You do realize your reply has nothing to do with the subject, right? As for duplicated, that scene has been both duplicated and surpassed, both in numbers and quality. To answer the question, 5 is the minimum for me. The ideal nmber is between 5-10, beyond that and theres just the inevitable shots of naked guys jerking off.
I prefer 5 because it gives the possibility for airplane , triple-blowjob + DP ; and airtight with sidestroking .
4on1 is good bcuz it gives the possibilty for double-BJ + DP . 3on1 only interests me these days when there is a tripl-facial at the end with simultaneous clean-up .
-----
Can´t find another topic with " How many men are enough for a GnB ? " Otherwise this can be copied over there :
For some years I thought 9 men were enough , but I just realized that I don´t really enjoy seeing men licking the model´s feet in a GnB setting . So my maximum set-up would be a mixed 9on1 ( 7 guys + 2 girls on the main model ) :
DP + triple blowjob + stroking 2 more dicks + 1 girl licking each foot .
Otherwise I find it disheartening to see other guys standing in line or in a corner stroking themselves while waiting . Loss of money and resources .
Posted - Jan 1 2010 : 5:40PM
the world may never know.