Reviewers Recommend My DP 9 - review by Captain Jack Director: Laurent Sky, Julia Grandi Starring: Cherry Kiss, Kazumi, Jayla De Angelis, Viola Weber. Read review
So , I'm watching a scene from La Femme du Pecheur this evening with Angelica Bella giving a fantastic looking double BJ to Tom Byron and Joey Silvera . Back and forth she goes . Suck . Slurp . Intense Eye Contact . lovin' it
The camera angle changes , and apparently she's grown lazy - no longer willing to swivel her head back and forth from cock to cock - she's drawn the rods next to each other . Now all she has to do is turn slightly and there's fresh man flesh to guzzle on . But . But , the heads are getting awfully close ! Getting closer in fact . And then it happens . By now holding the men's tools by the stems , she starts to rub their heads together . this is a straight video remember And what is the reaction of Mr Byron and Joey S ? Nothing . That's right , sweet FA . It's not as if she's even licking them anymore either . They just stand there and enjoy the new action . Has this suddenly become Bi porn ?
Gotta admit this is just a little too much man love for me , but I wonder at what point you find yourself saying " Just too gay for me " . It's all a matter of taste I know - so where do you draw the line ?
I agree totally - there should never be any point in a straight themed porno when two guys dicks touch. It happens in double blow job scenes and in double vag or anal scenes. it's just wrong. I know if I was a guy in a scene like that - i'd feel incredibly wierd about having my cock touch another guys!!! urrgh.
Nothing says I love you so much as a tongue in the ass. 2884 Posts 1/03
Posted - Aug 20 2004 : 6:43PM
The performers involved are either a little bit more open minded than some viewers or they just see it as incidental contact. I'm not obssessed with labels nor do I concern myself with other's sexuality. If it's hot, I'm good. I know that nobody likes to feel ambushed but if it happens you'll know who's work to avoid in the future.
[Link]
Pocketcomb_Pimp Deactivated User
1921 Posts 7/03
Posted - Aug 20 2004 : 6:51PM
I don't like it when men touch. So if there are Eagle Scout, (Rubbin Dicks together), leg locked, or even putting hands on each others shoulders, that's way too familiar for me.
A man should be able to do it on his own. If you dick rubbin, your stuff is too small, If you are leaning on each other, you ain't man, or strong enough to bring the heat, and if any other limbs are touching, I suggest you get out of porn and work it out with Dr. Phil.
when the Internet Adult Film Database flashed up peter north's birthday a few weeks ago I clicked to see the films he had done. to my total shock I found that he did a lot of gay porn as well. after talking with a woman I know who use to be in the adult industry she told me that most of the guys have done gay porn before. really a kick to the head to find that out. so incidential contact or not they probably weren't minding it.
What the guys do in a porn film doesn't affect my sexuality. If they don't mind rubbing dicks, whatever; I'll be over here chillin' until the focus gets back on the female talent. If it looks to be going on for very long I'll hit the FF button or jump to the next chapter (hurrah for DVD!).
Hot damn! A scene I might actually want to watch!!! That sounds sooooo cool. It might have been even cooler, if she had the guys standing close enough together to actually hold her hands around their shafts together and make one big double penis... oh man, I would pay to see that! YES!!
Dude, ladies, gentlemen, a dick touching a dick does not gay make. But that's just my humble opinion. Gay means you are sexually aroused and attracted to other men. Getting a blowjob from a hot chick at the same time as a good buddy and our dicks happen to rub together? So what, so what, so what, you boring little cunt!
Maybe I'm the freak here, but incidental contact doesn't bother me in the least. Seeking out the affection and physical contact of a man defines homosexual. If my dick is in the missus' pussy while a buddy is in her ass and our balls slap together -- so what, so what, so you boring little fuck!
Jesus Christ; challenge me. I know I'm right here. Be less worried about touching man meat than questioning your entire sexuality!
God hates us all, you know it's true, God hates this place. - Slayer 1726 Posts 10/03
Posted - Aug 20 2004 : 7:47PM
Your not a freak, I agree with you whole-heartedly. A lot of people misuse the word "gay" that simply annoys the hell out of me. I find it laughable some lump two guys who's cocks touched as a chick was sucking them into the "gay" category...
For me personally, dicks touching in a scene is a turn-off. As for gay or not, I think it's only gay if the men attached to those dicks get off on the contact. If there's a double vag/anal scene, and the friction between the touching cocks is a turn-on for either of the males involved, that's gay.
I like to think that I'm pretty reasonable and open-minded about sex, and am comfortable with the idea that in simultaneous, multiple partner sex, things can and do happen.
But from my seat, what Lee-O described after he went bold , WAS NOT "incidental" contact. The girl had taken the two dicks and was deliberately rubbing the heads against each other for her visual enjoyment. Apparently, if I understand Lee-O correctly, this also appeared to be sexually gratifying, or at a mimimum non-repulsive to Tom and Joey. But the point is, the girl was no longer the source of the sexual stimulation that the guys appeared to be enjoying, but she seemed to be but a conduit for the act.
For me, the guys deriving pleasure from the deliberate act of rubbing their dicks together, whether they do it themselves, or whether a girl does it for them, constitutes homosexual activity. While I certainly don't think that Byron and Silvera are homosexual, and wouldn't care if they were, I think the distinction is important. This is something that the girl did on her own in the heat of the moment, and as far as I know, this wasn't pre-planned by the boys. They didn't initiate the activity, and as they were also aroused and caught up in the moment, (not to mention they were professional porn stars of some repute), they probably didn't sweat it too much.
But it's not that much of a leap for a scenario to be envisioned where straight guys, in a straight but cutting edge flick, (say a Mason joint?}, could have that as part of the script while engaged in a b\g\b. Say a dominating Ariana Jollee ordering a Brandon Iron and Erik Everhard to caress, stroke, or otherwise stimulate each other while, or before they work the shit out of her. Not your basic, bi-boy, "I'd just as soon put it in his ass as hers", stuff, but the kind of stuff that lets Mason be Mason , and has earned her the reputation she has.
For people that are not prepared for this, or don't want this in their "straight" porn, this could be problematic and they probably shouldn't have it sprung on them.
I really don't care about arms and legs getting entangled in gang bangs, or balls contacting balls in dp's, or even guys cumming on other guys in orgies. I've seen all those things in straight porn and never thought twice about it meaning anything more than it was. But the psychological and philosophical aspect of the males being physically stimulated and gratified by contact with each other and not by the girl, changes the equation. I probably would have been somewhat unnerved as Lee-O was, not because I'm homophobic, but because that's not what I wanted, or paid to see. If I wanted that, I know what part of the porn store to go to to get it.
It's probably not a big deal, and I certainly don't think any less of anyone involved, but I think there is a point to be made here.
I'm sure some of you people would complain about guys getting rimjobs from a girl as "gay."
Point is, there's no bright line here- is getting the guy's ass involved (even if only by other women) "gay?" Is a DP "gay?" How about DAP/DPP? Swordfights in the mouth? Or the ever popular male on male oral sex?
Pretty much everyone will have said "yes" at some point on that list. However, it's also likely that someone will have said "yes" to every single one of those points.
Trying to draw a line is pointless, just like trying to define porn/not porn or obscenity. It's much easier to just hit fast forward.
Don't know whom you are referring to, since you use the phrase "some of you people would...", when making your generalizations, but since I disagree with the illustrations you present, I'll offer an opinion.
In common usage, "gay" is a euphemism for homosexual. "Homosexual" requires two basic components. The obvioous, two people of the same sex, and the implied "willingness". (If a man gets raped in prison by another man against his will, that doesn't make him gay.)
So all of the examples you provide with the exception of male on male oral sex do not meet the definition of "gay". At least, not mine.
I've found being rimmed by a girl an erotic and pleasurable experience, and I enjoy seeing it in my porn. Additionally, if some guy likes to have his girl strap on a unit and fuck him up the ass, I view that as a sexual practice between consenting adults, without any bearing on his or her sexual orientation. Women have stuck their fingers up my ass and I never once considered myself gay.
Right. But even in this thread, we're seeing some of the "DAP/DPP is gay" line of argument.
I wasn't making any sort of declaration, just noting that different people draw the line at different places, and thus any attempt to complain about "not-gay" vs. "gay" activities in porn is doomed to failure.
Oh please. How fucking stupid. Try it, you might like it. And then -- HORRORS! == you'd be a FAG!
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!
Besides, you can't work in adult doing multi=partner scenes and not be a LITTLE bit homo. It just comes with the turf. Everybody knows that. Embrace your inner cocksucker. You'll feel better in the morning. Girls like a guy whose just a little "sensitive," ya know -- like a best girlfriend who just happens to have a fat cock!
I enjoy scenes when the girls put two dicks in the mouth at the same time and also like it very much when they rub the cocks together. Two dicks working in the same hole - just fantastic! I love this - but I´m not gay! - maybe a little bi?... When the girl is playing with her toys everything should be allowed. Such an action is so incredible nasty! In my opinion this is not gay - it´s a big and creative enrichment of porno! To all critics: Please don´t be so closed-minded! Porn always should be free & visionary!
Inference is a dangerous little animal isn't she ?
I wasn't repulsed or upset . Just surprised at an act which must be a serious rage inducer to some porn punters - just check out CC's post in News and Nonsense - so can the 'fucking stupid' comments please .
So I'm a boring little cunt for not getting off on the same stuff you do ?! Fine . So be it .
Thanks bud . From the very heart of my bottom .
Ditto . However this was something new in my porn viewing experience ( in a DVD marketed to the straight sector anyway ) , and made me wonder just when other viewers think straight -> bi . It intrigued me , doesn't it you ?
Look, there's only two ways anything can be gay. If the viewer is gay and gets off on it, or if the participants get off on it.
The first one above might be a little confusing. But, life really is a matter of perceptions. A racial slur is demeaning to some, funny to others. Does that make it right or wrong? Again, that depends on your perceptions. So, the way a person views a given situation is really the only thing that matters. This is why we have war, both verbal and physical.
Is gay sex in prison gay? The way I hear it, it's only gay if you are a willing catcher. If you don't mind opening your mouth, or bending over, that's gay. The rapist isn't considered gay, and accusing him of so would get you raped and then killed, not necessarily in that order.
But, to recap, it's gay if you think it's gay (I can already hear the argument on this one), Or it's gay if the participants think it's gay.
I'm wholeheartedly on the same page as Kimi on this one! A few weeks ago I started a thread titled "Double Blow Jobs" or something like that, in which I asked if anyone knew of any blowjob scenes where two guys were lying down with their heads in opposite directions and with their legs scissored together so that their cocks (and balls) were right up next to each other. I remember seeing a scene like that in an old "Collection" lop from the late 70's and always thought it was incredibly hot. Seeing the girl work over both cocks like that - preferably rubbing the heads together, having a miniature sword fight, sucking on both heads at the same time, and even attempting to deep throat both cocks simultaneously is something I would pay very good money to see. I have no idea if this is something done regularly in gay porn, 'cause I don't watch gay porn. You'd think you'd see this in shemale porn, but unfortunately, most directors must think this is too "gay", or else they just don't know about the possibility. Maybe the logistics of filming it are too complicated. Whatever.
I will say that the idea of complaining that it seems "gay" that a girl starts rubbing the heads of 2 cocks together during a double blowjob scene without the guys freaking out seems to ignore the endless cock-against-cock contact that occurs in each and every DP scene. I mean we're talking one entire cock rubbing up against another entire cock inside a girls pussy or ass. This stuff goers on in so many movies these days it's almost de rigueur, i.e. required in porn.
So, thanks to Lee O for staring this thread - my only question to him is - How was the rest of the film? After reading about the "gay" scene in question, I'd like to know if the rest of the film justifies buying it!
Lee O. My point of view: if out of the entire film this scene was the only one that you considered might be bordering on (or actually was) gay - then I would still say you were watching a straight movie.
If this act and others troughout the movie were of a similar type, and there was more than 1, then perhaps its not a straight movie.
As for whether it was gay or not - in my opinion, no. When movies are made, most of what you watch is made for as wide an audience as possible (as you can see by the replies you got - some like it others do not).
This scene freaked you out. There might be some that do not, and would totally scare the bee-jesus out of me.
Different strokes for different folks. So to speak.
I wouldn't say freaked out , startled is nearer the mark . If my original post gave that impression then that was a tonal error on my part . This seemed to be against the unwritten rules that most porn films apparently follow - the same rules which give us BJ -> cunni -> vag -> anal -> facial , with a few variations . Not long ago double anal was outside the norm , now it's the trick of favour for aspiring young actresses . I wonder if this will eventually go the same way .
Sorry to disappoint , but no . This isn't a film worth owning by any but the most 'dedicated' Angie Bellica fan - ie. me ! It's dark , suffers from poor picture quality , and has far too many close ups ( cut from one to another at times ) . But then again that's just my boring opinion .
It's exactly those different strokes for those different folks that I'm asking about . Strange that very few people have been willing to share their own limits after the crusaders bashed into town . I'm not talking about any abstract porno truth that you think should apply to all discs . Just the boundries as you've discovered they apply to you .
Incidentally I intend keeping the film . The part of the scene in question though is useless to me as jack off fodder - not complaining , just commenting .
I'm with Karl on this one, I start losing interest as soon as there's a DP. Nothing is wrong with DP, mind you, but it simply isn't what I'm interested in watching, and stonger stuff than that holds still less interest. I mention this only because Lee seemed to be taking a poll of sorts (now if he was taking a pole, that WOULD be gay, or at least bi, but I digress...) and so this is my response.
Best scene like that is Traci Lords with Harry Reems and Rick Masters in the 1985 Mitchell Bros. film, "The Grafenberg Spot." Unfortunately, Traci was only 15 at the time, so this one is hard to find. in the blooper reel, she tries to fit both cocks into her mouth and flubs it, starts laughing. It's pretty cool. But, illegal now!
I just happened to be quoting "So What?" lyrics since I had posted them in a "Favorite Lyrics" poll earlier in the day. Perhaps I should have italicized them; it was the third beer. No offense intended, mate.
I didn't answer the question, though. Where do I draw the line? I know it wouldn't arouse me to watch guys suck each other off, but it does arouse me to see a woman with two men any which way they can all get things syncopated including any and all incidental contact between friends, except DPP or DAP (it just looks awkward and uncomfortable for everyone involved to me, and no - I'm not knocking anyone who's a fan of it).
It's not a woodkill, though. Man eating man ass or sucking or fucking each other would give me pause - it's now gay or bi straight up. If that's what I was expecting, then fine, but don't surprise me!
Just my luck! How the hell could Tracy have been so frickin' hot and be underage at the same time? I'm always amazed when I hear about some of the things she did in her movies. I remember seeing some clips back in the early 80s (I think), but now her movies are long gone.
I wonder if there are excepts from this flick out there somewhere on the net? (Just wondering, mind you!)
Patience is a virtue, but who wants to be virtuous? 4283 Posts 4/00
Posted - Aug 21 2004 : 3:50PM
I hadn't previously answered this for a couple of reasons: I'm jaded, and not the normal porn viewer anymore; and I actually like bi-sexual guys, so I'm biased (no pun intended )!
But taking those things into mind, here's where I draw the line of what's I like, and what I consider to be a homosexual act: I like pretty much anything, including watching gay sex. What do I consider a homosexual act? I guess 2 guys willingly interacting with each other that includes penetration of some sort (oral, anal). Or one of the guys getting more aroused by looking at another guy.
Like I said, maybe I'm jaded, but I've been seeing 2 dicks in 1 girls mouth for awhile now, especially in BJ series'.
I searched through some old threads on ADT and the consensus is that, while it is possible to import Traci's movies, it is indeed illegal to own them (with the exception of Traci I Love You , which was made after she turned 18)
So, no luck getting this rare double-blowjob-rubbing-cockheads-together scene.
Maybe if I petition Jules Jordan, Mike John, Brandon, et al, enough, they can make this happen. Can't hurt
Oh, and thanks to Tricia for her feedback - yes double blowjobs per se are no longer rare, but being jaded myself, I tend to want such scenes to get a little more adventurous.
Just to reiterate, cocks are constantly rubbing against each other internally all the time during DPs and double blowjobs. What would be so wrong to see it happening in full view?
Thanks for your words cumwhipper - this is exactly the same what I feel! So I petition the pornlords with prayer: Give us such DBRCTS 'double-blowjob-rubbing-cockheads-together scenes'!!!
Thanks for your words cumwhipper - this is exactly the same what I feel! So I petition the pornlords with prayer: Give us such DBRCTS 'double-blowjob-rubbing-cockheads-together scenes'!!! [/quote]
But please warn us first!!
[Link]
DIAMOND DOG Deactivated User
"Puff Daddy is crap." - Keith Richards 320 Posts 7/04
Posted - Aug 23 2004 : 4:27AM
Any guy who is a WILLING participant in getting pleasure from another man, whether it be a rub of the dick, oral, or full blown sex has homosexual tendencies. Even if it's with a girl "helping" them out.
Why are we splitting hairs here?
I have no problems with gay people, in fact I have a few friends who are. And I'm sure they would tell you that two guys getting off while a chick rubs their dick together would be considered at least a little gay. If I did it, I would consider myself gay and I wouldn't be in denial about it.
I think alot of people who watch porn on a regular basis really do become jaded. They see so much over-the-top shit that a little rub of the dick seems like such small potatoes. But in the "real" world, two guys enjoying their dicks being rubbed together is gay, and not the most outrageous porn viewing or anyone's opinion will change that for me.
Not to split pubic hairs here, but I'm not talking about the guys enjoying or not enjoying their dicks rubbing together. Merely that they tolerate it, like they already do in virtually every DP and double-blowjob you see in porn.
And since they already do tolerate it (and I assume you're not ready to say that virtually all the male talent in porn willing to participate in DPs and double-blowjobs is gay), then why for god's sake can't it be done outside the woman's mouth, ass, or pussy?
Searching for blonde and red bush 1985 Posts 10/02
Posted - Aug 23 2004 : 9:15AM
I do not enjoy watching rubbing dicks.
[Link]
DIAMOND DOG Deactivated User
"Puff Daddy is crap." - Keith Richards 320 Posts 7/04
Posted - Aug 23 2004 : 3:28PM
No, I also think double blowjobs, DAP and DPP are a bit gay too. I don't enjoy watching that in the least either. I think the men that do it who do not have gay tendencies only do it because they feel they absolutely have to to continue making a living.
Either way, it's all a little too "happy" for me. But it's not like I expect these men who make their living being manly, macho men to come right out and say they love penis.
Not to split pubic hairs here, but I'm not talking about the guys enjoying or not enjoying their dicks rubbing together. Merely that they tolerate it, like they already do in virtually every DP and double-blowjob you see in porn.
And since they already do tolerate it (and I assume you're not ready to say that virtually all the male talent in porn willing to participate in DPs and double-blowjobs is gay), then why for god's sake can't it be done outside the woman's mouth, ass, or pussy?
[/quote]
What is the point of making porn for straight guys that shows guys rubbing dicks? Why not just watch gay porn? I prefer to see as little of the guys as possible.
I don't really like the dicks rubbing together thing, but I do like videos that feature female on male rimming. Movies like Oral Consumption and Ass Eaters Unanimous. By the sounds of it from sales, many others like it too. I believe Ass Eaters Unanimous is the top seller at Evolution Erotica. Some may view this act as more "gay" but I see it differently. Porn is about fantasy, and if you can visualize or fantasize about some beautiful babe doing that to you, and pretend you are in the movie, that is what really gets me going with this genre. Plus it is pretty nasty, which is great. Others may disagree, but for me this is not "too gay". Axlsfury