Click here to jump to its new location.
[Link]
| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| Matt Casey Deactivated User 20 Posts 7/04 |  Posted - Jul 6 2004 : 3:51PMAs a British guy who supported the USA involvement in both Gulf wars, I find the title, Weapons of Ass Destruction to be offesive to the UK and USA British soldiers who died in these wars. Jules Jordan, you're a prick! I make no apologies for that. Topic Moved by - MLyons on Jul 6 2004 [Link] |
| MLyons Senior Member 1617 Posts 8/02 | Posted - Jul 6 2004 : 4:06PM Click here to jump to its new location. [Link] |
| Gof Member United Kingdom 151 Posts 4/03 | Posted - Jul 6 2004 : 4:11PM Firstly, both the US Administration and the UK Government convinced there public to support the war based on the false premise that Sadam had so-called Weapons of Mass Destruction and was a threat to the US and the UK. This reason for going to war has since proved to have been fallacious. Secondly, I'm tired of the view that any critcism of the war is some how unpatriotic or disrespects the troops over in the Gulf. Criticism over the government's policy, or 'free speech', is exactly what a healthy, free democracy is about, and is the reason why we are all able to watch and talk about pornography. Finally therefore, Jules Jordan has the same right as everyone else to criticise the hypocricy of Bush and Blair and, quite frankly, the world would be a better place if we made more love not war. [Link] |
| Walter Burns Legendary Quoter IAFD, supporters of beastiality. Just say no. 7564 Posts 11/02 | Posted - Jul 6 2004 : 8:14PM Isn't a moved thread closed automatically in the original forum? Should have posted this elsewhere, I am sure. [Link] |
| Saki At-Large 2087 Posts 11/99 | Posted - Jul 6 2004 : 8:25PM |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |