[Link]
| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| cantgetlaid Member 93 Posts 1/10 |  Posted - Oct 2 2011 : 1:41PMThere's just way too much fetish, uberhardcore stuff in modern porn. By classic I could mean stuff from the late 70s (not early, because the women weren't really that good looking say before 1977) to the mid 1990s, though I'd have to excluse 1980s stuff shot on tape, the low quality just ruins it for me. But the stuff now, DPs, triples, just too many men. The rough stuff is a real turn off as well. I can't contemplate how you could get off humiliating someone, or watching someone get humiliated, smacked, etc.. Er, so long as they are willing participants, whatever floats your boat, but I still don't see how you could get turned on by seeking a woman smacked, having fists shoved in her mouth.. And don't even get me started on the stuff I haven't even bothered watching like Max Hardcore stuff (though some of his early stuff wasn't hardcore like that).. Plus I could basically kind of relate more to the men in classic porn, it's more realistic for me to imagine "that could be me" rather than seeing some musclebound dude (I'm muscular, but not grotesque body building type you see a lot) with tons of tattoos. And ugh, tattoos. A few are okay, but all over the place? Why? Especially if the woman is beautiful. why??????? [Link] |
| WillBlast Member 184 Posts 10/09 | Posted - Oct 2 2011 : 2:19PM [Link] |
| cantgetlaid Member 93 Posts 1/10 | Posted - Oct 2 2011 : 2:38PM [Link] |
| RedDevil87 Senior Member 1044 Posts 4/11 | Posted - Oct 2 2011 : 2:46PM Edited by - reddevil87 on 10/2/2011 2:47:35 PM Edited by - reddevil87 on 10/2/2011 2:48:44 PM [Link] |
| Peoples Temple Member People tell lies my friend. Some people like publicity. I don't like publicity. 674 Posts 5/11 | Posted - Oct 3 2011 : 2:41PM Back then, they had natural bodies, unshaven private areas, no fake boobs, little makeup, no tattoos, no piercings and genuinely seemed to enjoy performing on camera. I see so many jaded performances today that I can't think of anytime porn has been worse than it is today. I am sick of seeing the rough stuff, slapping, spitting, hair pulling, DPs and countless flat performances by the girls. No wonder so many people deliver so many sub par performances. I see so many girls and guys covered with tattoos it makes me question what in the world the director was thinking for even using them? I think what you have today are a lot of directors whose sole focus is on profit, meeting their budget regardless of what they turn out and far less emphasis on quality. [Link] |
| RedDevil87 Senior Member 1044 Posts 4/11 | Posted - Oct 3 2011 : 2:54PM [Link] |
Hardware  All-Star Member Your other left 14595 Posts 3/02 | Posted - Oct 3 2011 : 2:56PM If there is a market for slapping, spitting and gagging then I have no complaint that somebody is catering to it, even though it doesn't do anything for me, either. As far as I'm concerned, porn is all about personality. While I, too, dislike the tattoo trend, even that can be overcome by personality, witness my affection for Lena Juliett. That being so, I'll keep watching new porn as long as there are performers I can relate to. [typo :: sigh] Edited by - hardware on 10/3/2011 2:56:55 PM [Link] |
| RedDevil87 Senior Member 1044 Posts 4/11 | Posted - Oct 3 2011 : 3:01PM So just because you don't like rough stuff doesn't mean you can generalize and try to pretend the girls don't like it. There are plenty of performers who clearly love nothing more than to be treated rough, DP'd etc. [Link] |
| pat362 Senior Member 10083 Posts 3/10 | Posted - Oct 3 2011 : 4:22PM [Link] |
| BumBum Member 395 Posts 1/07 | Posted - Oct 3 2011 : 6:55PM I would never slap a chick (except, of course, her butt), or spit on her, or put her head in a toilet bowl, or put my foot on her face, or any of that other ridiculous crap that goes on. Nor would I be into ATM, or having a chick lick a toy that just came out of her ass. Of course I would like to be with multiple hot chicks, although it would likely kill me. On the other hand, I love all of the anal, and some of it is extremely well shot, like the stuff from Jules Jordan and Mike Adriano. If you ever look at Penthouse pix from the 70s, the girls are super gorgeous, and they have no tats, fake boobs, or piercings. Why would a gorgeous chick mutilate herself with that stuff. I just don't get it. [Link] |
| BlackSix All-Star Member pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07 | Posted - Oct 4 2011 : 2:14AM [Link] |
| shank Member 119 Posts 2/09 | Posted - Oct 4 2011 : 3:42AM [Link] |
| Electric_Logan Member 384 Posts 6/11 | Posted - Oct 4 2011 : 3:45AM I can still find what I like in the modern stuff. On the odd occasion I come across some of this which I don't like say part of the way through a scene and it pisses me off. I try to skip it but if it remains then I'm out. But I don't like classic so much because I consider it to be too dull. [Link] |
| oldguy Senior Member 1270 Posts 3/06 | Posted - Oct 4 2011 : 5:26AM [Link] |
| Cuddly Wombat Senior Member Just another bare bum in the shiower 1739 Posts 12/04 | Posted - Oct 4 2011 : 7:54AM [Link] |
| pat362 Senior Member 10083 Posts 3/10 | Posted - Oct 4 2011 : 9:24AM [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |