New Pornstar Interviews - [more]
Introducing Natasha Carter

"Dirty talk is a really big thing for me."
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 849 > Icons on Adam & Eve features, finale
AuthorPost
Diesel
Member


516 Posts
3/00
Posted - Dec 4 2000 : 12:32AM

Hello, ImageKat! Thanks for your comments with regard to my whining and complaining about the Adam & Eve "Hot Shots" graphic.

Unless the icon is removeable, or can be turned off at the viewer's option, I am completely against ANY graphic on my DVD movies or programs, no matter how small or discreet.

The original artistic integrity of the finished movie is compromised for the sake of a featured novelty [i.e., a cumshot or change in angles] and it detracts from the viewing experience (yes I know that porn serves a "purpose" and is not really meant to be watched like a Martin Scorsese flick but bear with me here). If SEX ISLAND were meant to be a "virtual sex" flick like the ones starring Tera Patrick and Jenna Jameson, then I would not care. But SEX ISLAND is a feature movie (whatever its merits or success is a matter of opinion) and I don't like watching a movie while being reminded that it's also an interactive DVD.

In Metro's latest flick, MEMOIRS OF A MADAM, the company seems to have done away with any on-screen identification of its multiple angles (they used to use a "2ND ANGLE" graphic description which cheesed me off to no end). I wish that VCA and especially Vivid Video would do the same.

And although DVDs are getting cheaper and cheaper and are appealing to more of the great unwashed masses, I don't feel that Adam & Eve should have to pander to consumers who won't take the time to read the manual to see how their player works. If the viewer doesn't know how to use his/her remote well enough to get to a climactic scene immediately, well, I'm sure they will eventually find satisfaction without being guided by an icon.

So if Adam & Eve gives us an option to turn off the icon, then that would be swell [but please fix the glitch where the speed search buttons are disabled during several chapters], but if I had it my way, I would just stick to giving the viewers good solid transfers with everything else being [optional] gravy.

Oh, and thank you, ImageKat and JKrull for listening!


ImageKat stated the following:

Albeit a little annoying to some, we have been working
to get it more translucent and in the bottom right hand
corner, and smaller. My question to you is, if it were
in this position, like the networks, would it still
bother you? Unfortunately we have a function to take
the viewer right to the main event, but if nothing
is there to tell them, how do they know? My point
being most DVD viewers are not up to speed on all
the functions of the remotes, and as we continue
to change what these functins can do it will continue
to get more murky.

Thanks for the Ear!!

Saki
At-Large

2087 Posts
11/99
Posted - Dec 4 2000 : 1:51AM
My own opinion on this subject is skewed because 1.) I've watched a hell of a lot more porn in my life than the average consumer, and 2.) I hold porn to a higher standard than the average consumer (and, it seems, some of the studios that produce it). #2 is probably a direct result of #1--if you don't know what "good porn" is, then you don't know what you're missing.

With that said, I hate any sort of non-optional watermarking or hyperlinking in the feature presentation. Those practices totally destroys any sense of fantasy. While techniques like making the logos semitransparent or smaller are better than the alternatives, the net effect is the same as if you ran a CNNfn stock ticker along the bottom of the screen.

Seeing that companies such as Adam & Eve and Vivid tend to have very unsavvy consumers (both in terms of porn and technology), I guess I can see the rationale in wanting to include some visual hints. But that's not going to stop me from listing them in my pet peeves in my reviews and it's going to be a disincentive for me to buy the product in the future.

But, to be realistic, I'm under no illusion that my opinion represents more than a minority of the porn consumers. To many, AOL porn is just fine, but I'm way beyond that stage. Obviously, I think it's better to educate the viewer rather than ruin the experience for those who understand how to operate their DVD players, but that may be just me...

Saki




Jump To: