It is a well known fact that the protuberance of the female nipple during sex is directly related to the cost of the lingerie she's wearing at the time. Ergo, the answer is simple - check out those tits!
While there maybe be a few perverts that would get off watching studs cum all over price tags with lots of digits, I'm guessing that the market for this sort of fetish is rather limited.
I, for one, could not afford to pay $200 for such a porno. With my budget, I would be willing to pay $20-30 to see Teagan in a Wicked Weasel bikini, but that's just me.
TonyC wrote:It's all in the ripping sound and the subsequent reaction to that sound...coos and purrs of delight equal VS's knock-off, shrill squeals of alarm equal super expensive French number...at your own risk... :)
To Gold_Member's question, I'd appreciate the effort at elegance. It wouldn't be the deciding factor though.
Based on solely that criteria, no way. The girls are all that matter really, and maybe how cum blasted they get. I don't care if the clothes are made out of paper towels or platinum encased thread with 24kt and diamond accents. If the girls looked like high fashion models and had the stuff on and the bit was played out through the flick, yes I would buy it anyway.
With $50K-$250K/flick, Wicked, Vivid, et al do a pretty sad job of portraying elegance. I can't imagine that putting expensive lingerie on the women in a JJ shoot would change it very much. In fact, my guess is that really nice lingerie would look tragically out of place. Costuming, sets, cars, etc should never point out the lack of budget or lack of sophistication in the rest of the production.
On a related note, Ashley Blue wore a simple summer dress to the Expo and in so doing stood out amongst the myriad of dolls squeezed into too tiny tops and bottoms.
It doesn't have to be high fashion, but I appreciate well dressed women. The hip-hop club outfits can be fun, but there's fantasy in peeling the tigress out of the demur wrapping, as well.
I'm not into all that lingerie stuff unless it's the kind of lingerie Stagliano uses in his Buttman movies. I like the girls totally nude including no shoes, in my opinion it's better that way.
Like Ramsey I prefer 100% nude. Jules' movies almost always have the girls dressed up already, better quality clothes won't make a difference to me. I want 'em off.
Still wanking after all these years. 8082 Posts 10/00
Posted - Jul 6 2004 : 5:47AM
No I don't like his movies in general, especially his castings. I mean what's the use of putting expensive lingerie on vulgar, tattoed and pierced women?