Can anybody explain why a "moderator" (I would rather call him a "censor") of another porn forum hasn't allowed me for three times to post an answer to a thread containing blatant mistakes made by a notorious (or, more correctly, infamous) porn critic exhibiting all his incompetence in the matter and light-heartedly contradicting himself?
Shall I have to assume, benevolently, that the censor in question is in cahoots with the said critic? Or maybe paid by him? I've been told from this cocksucker to eliminate the personal attacks because they're "old". Which means, I think, that the poster in question can go on saying all kinds of imbecilities without fear of being contradicted. May I assume there's a kind of dirty game behind all of this or is it just a matter of lack of grey-cells?
[Link]