I don't think you're the typical fetishist who is into one special fetish and nothing else, but you don't avoid fetish movies, either. It should just be something special (special in the sense of extraordinary, but not in the sense of something definite). You don't follow certain porn stars. You just want a bit of "everything". So you're an experimental guy.
Or maybe you just haven't found "your" fetish up to now. Then you'd be a roaming wolf or something.

I hope I don't miss the target by far since unlike Rome my opinion was built in just about five minutes.

She gives me pleasure no gauge can measure.

[Link]

I think I agree with the fact I like the glossy stuff, but by that I don't mean couples stuff, but Private, which can still get nasty but retain the glossy sheen and high production values.

For me bang-for-your-buck is a biggie, as I buy and don't rent, so value is important. I can get extreme, but try to steer away from the likes of Skeeter or Nacho Vidal. Not into the rough stuff. The Fashionistas is my limit in that regard, and mainly because it had a plot.

It's true I experiment with various things, and still wonder what my personal fetish is. I have a big thing for black stockings, and do like feet, but only in a small way (that's why the fetish-feet titles don't really do it for me).

Oh, and in regard to being obsessed with the cumshot, I agree I do crave good cum shots, where the guy shoots a good amount. Facials I prefer over swallowing (I like the messiness), but still can't understand why any porn can still get away with the weak, dribbled out cumshot? In this day and age, that should not exist!

But am I obsessed? No. I couldn't be bothered with a totally oral-themed movie like Feeding Frenzy , and the bukkake stuff is a little disgusting. Maybe I focus on it, because it's so hard to get it right, it seems.

Keep those replies coming.

Edited by - experimentalguy on 1/10/2005 2:59:50 PM

[Link]

1.) I'm already interested in the movie, and want an opinion on it before I get it.

2.) The reviewer is one I enjoy reading.

To be honest, I mostly read reviews for the latter reason. I don't like to sngle people out, as that's not really nice to everyone else, but there are a couple reviewers on ADT that I read regardless of whether I have any intention of getting the movie they are reviewing, simply because I like to read their reviews. They bring something unique to what they write, whether it's a bit of humor, a bit of fun, an intersting angle, or just an extra insight into the movie in question, or porn in general that goes above and beyond the call of duty. In fact, I especially enjoy reading reviews by people like this, of movies I've already seen.

I looked at the list of movies you reviewed, and nothing sprang to my attention in terms of titles I'd love to see. The only one that came close was Lusty Legs, so I read that one. I also read your latest review--of Millionare just to see if you'd changed styles or anything. You seem to cover the stuff that needs to be covered for what you're looking for. On ADT, the difference between the reviewers' styles and preferences in what to review is exactly what makes this site so damn valuable. There will be people who relate to your sensibilities and use your reviews to decide whether to purchase a movie. Of that I have no doubt. If you're asking what _I'd_ like to see, well, it doesn't really matter. You should write what, and how, you want to write. For my tastes, your style is a smidge dry, and you don't gravitate toward the movies that I do, but honestly, there's nothing wrong with that.

I wouldn't worry so much about it. Write the reviews for the fun of writing them, first. I, myself, am really trying for more brevity these days. In any case, an audience will follow if you enjoy what you're writing. Just don't ever expect to get much feedback. Feedback is relatively rare, even, I expect, for the most prolific among us.

Edited by - MLyons on 1/25/2005 2:48:16 PM

[Link]

Thanks for taking time to do the reviews!

[Link]

I think that your reviews are quite good.There aren't too many of them , but they are pretty well written. I don't read every single review that comes out because I am very choosy when it comes to porn. I read every lesbian review , 2 girls /1 guy videos , and alot of gonzo stuff. I always skip over anything from Private , Vivid , or anything too squeeky clean.
I know that some stuff from Private is quite nasty but i don't like their style very much , even though I consider it to be very well produced.
I definately like to read lots of details about the scenes because that's where I get my important info. For example , I don't really get anything out of a review that just states who the participants are , with pics , and a very brief outline of the scene. That tells me NOTHING. I am looking for "girl/girl" kissing , and any mention of spit swapping or cumswapping within a scene , for example.
mentioning chemistry , attire , eye contact between actresses , bad or good editing , camera movement, etc.
These are the things that help me the most.
It's very understandable that not every detail can be mentioned , but to give you an idea , I like your reviews along with Picman , BonoOne , Selena Silver , and astroknight.
Keep writing them dude.

[Link]

Regards,
ExperimentalGuy

Girl With A Pearl Ear Ring? Girl With A Pearl Necklace more like...

[Link]

Joey (big Viv Thomas fan)

[Link]