more performer info on...

Image of Justine Joli

Justine Joli

Participate...

log in
register
Browse...

Etiquette
Active Topics
Popular Topics
Member List
Search
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 363 > I'm disappointed with 'Justine Joli: Lost'
AuthorPost
Xioniet
Member


263 Posts
1/10
Posted - Aug 5 2010 : 3:44AM
I'm a big fan of Justine Joli, and was very much looking forward to her new, all-girl release from Triangle Films, ''Justine Joli: Lost'.
However, I am very disappointed. Justine looks hot, and the other girls look hot too. It's just there is very little visible oral on screen. We see the girls munching at a distance, and from side angles. But we very rarely see up-close action. As far as I was concerned this may as well have been a censored porn movie. Or should I say soft-core.
I cannot see the point in getting all this top talent together, for it all to fall apart when it comes to showing the oral. This movie had great potential but I just give it 3 out of 10.
Anything else share my view?

[Link]
Xioniet
Member

263 Posts
1/10
Posted - Aug 6 2010 : 3:12AM
Hey, I'm just bumping this, because I wanna know what others think of this movie...
IF they have it. Thanks.
Go To Top of page
[Link]
zambi
Senior Member

1451 Posts
3/10
Posted - Aug 6 2010 : 3:25AM

I'm disappointed with Justine Joli period because she doesn't fuck guys
just girls.
Go To Top of page
[Link]
Only
Member

167 Posts
2/04
Posted - Aug 6 2010 : 11:03PM
I do agree with you (speaking about Xioniet), but to be honest I wasn't particularly expecting very much. They talked it up quite a bit like the prison movie they did, but I didn't really like that one either, I like more of their normal stuff and when they do the things with the big plot, it just doesn't work for me.
Go To Top of page
[Link]
Aplus
Senior Member

1431 Posts
5/05
Posted - Aug 10 2010 : 8:54AM
I haven't seen it, can't say that I want to now, so I can't comment on it directly. I'm always wary of "high concept" porn though. It usually screams "overly artsy porn" to me, which I generally find frustrating to watch. I don't generally listen to reviewers or fans that much, but when it comes to stuff like you describe, I consider myself duly-warned.
Go To Top of page
[Link]
 
Prophit
Member

378 Posts
1/07
Posted - Aug 10 2010 : 9:51AM
I haven't seen the movie but this lack off close-ups might have to do with the strange way Triangle shoot their stuff (they don't interrupt the models which is good actually but it also means you have many bad camera angles and views). It's been a while since I last saw a Triangle movie so they might have changed their approach to shooting in the meantime. But I remember that I was disappointed with their movies for the same reason (lack of close-ups).
Go To Top of page
[Link]
Gentleman Jon All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

1881 Posts
6/05
Posted - Aug 10 2010 : 11:00AM
With the few Triangle movies that I've seen since that company came into existence, I was slightly irritated by the way that they edited. They obviously shot with two cameras, and felt the need in editing to cut back and forth between the two views all the damn time. I was like, "Was there really never a time when one camera didn't have the better view for even one minute?"
Edited by - Gentleman Jon on 8/10/2010 11:04:51 AM
Go To Top of page
[Link]
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 363I'm disappointed with 'Justine Joli: Lost'

Previous topic: Going rates...
Next topic: Fucking requests... All these fucking requests...



Jump To: