My guess.
[Link]
Anal Slut Lilly Wants To Gape - review by Captain Jack| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| jm6d Member 417 Posts 2/11 |  Posted - Aug 20 2013 : 4:55PMA bit harshly put, but... I've seen much porn with anal sex and quite often the doggystyle or, occurring even more rarely, the position with the woman flat on her stomach are used a rather short period of time with most of the ’penetration time’ spent in other positions. Is this possibly due to some problem, such as being positions harder to regulate for the woman, or is it due to the choice of the director? Although personally I would like to see more of the two positions mentioned, I'm primarily curious. [Link] |
LCF  All-Star Member Non Prevalebunt! 10364 Posts 1/05 | Posted - Aug 20 2013 : 5:43PM My guess. [Link] |
| jm6d Member 417 Posts 2/11 | Posted - Aug 21 2013 : 12:49PM However I wonder if it's not more to it than this. I came to think about the anal scenes in the films of Simon Thaur. In those I've seen the most common anal position is with the woman flat on her stomach with spread legs and the man pumping. The second most common is with the woman on her knees in doggy style and the man behind pumping. At the moment I can't recall any other positions in his movies. Is there a cultural difference between Germany and USA concerning this or is Thaur an individual exception? Or, are those films maybe less concerned with full view, although in my view there is sufficient view? [Link] |
| Imperator Member 117 Posts 4/11 | Posted - Aug 21 2013 : 3:16PM I suspect this is because the point of bg porn has never been the woman or any of her body parts, and certainly not any shred of real intimacy such as eye contact. It's all about the penis. I personally find this obsession of heterosexual male viewers with the male anatomy baffling, but am resigned that I'm in the minority and that everything must be subject to the clear depictions of dicks in porn. Basically, if the dick is not visible the male viewers complain. Therefore b-g positions in porn are these bizarre contorted affairs, where the male model desperately twists his body out of the way; in the case of anal you have such absurdities as the guy climbing up high above the woman's buttocks in doggy so that the camera can have a clear view. My real question however is why the same fans who obsess over the visibility of the penis don't like the view from the top in doggy anal, but prefer the silly bottom one. In one case you see a lovely pair of buttocks being split, and in the other a pair of testicles hang from the top of the screen. And yet one is rare and the other one standard. Imp. [Link] |
| jm6d Member 417 Posts 2/11 | Posted - Sep 9 2013 : 5:29PM Yes, the interest for the penis is sometime overwhelming, not least research has mentioned the porn industry being somewhat obsessed by the male orgasm as a necessity. Anyhow, I've recently seen a scene with Melissa Laurent and Steve Holmes in Ass Wreckage 2. There the position that my learned friend calls ’pileup’ is prominently demonstrated in an US produced movie. Thus I wonder why this position, in my view, is so rare in US films? As I previously stated I also feel that doggystyle anal although frequent often is quite short compared to other positions. Comments, by everbody but especially from performers or others from the industry, would be much welcome. [Link] |
| Harder Than You Think Member From here to eternity. 257 Posts 4/13 | Posted - Sep 9 2013 : 5:48PM Can you give a description of this "pileup" position? Unless you were mistaken and it's called piledriver, in which case also I don't think it gives the best viewpoint of penetration (albeit certainly an unconventional and novel one!). Why would anyone want to watch any pornography studio besides Evil Angel? [Link] |
| jm6d Member 417 Posts 2/11 | Posted - Sep 9 2013 : 5:55PM [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |