New Pornstar Interviews - [more]
Tiny Khloe: 2026 Exxxotica Interview

"I’m attracted to people’s intelligence. I like some substance. I want to be able to hold a conversation."
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 127 > is it true that girlsdoporn girls are exclusive
AuthorPost
xroughxdiamondx
Member

12 Posts
6/10
Posted - Feb 27 2019 : 8:07PM
i was told that girls that are in girlsdoporn.com are exclusive and cannot work in other sites.

is this really true? and why would any girls do that?

rearadmiral All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

6532 Posts
12/11
Posted - Feb 27 2019 : 8:41PM
I'm far from an expert on this topic but I suspect that the girls on GDP aren't locked into an exclusive contract. I'm a lawyer, but in Canada. Our contract laws have some differences but a lot of similarities too. Such a contract would be found to be overly exclusive to restrict a person's ability to make a living. (Presuming, of course, that a model would want to litigate this.) It's fine if a star contracts with a studio because that would be a for a limited time (maybe a year or so) and would include a contractual guarantee of a certain number of scenes. A good agent would probably negotiate a minimum number of scenes at a set price. I suspect that when a girl enters into an exclusive contract with a studio she's doing at least as well financially as if she had been a free agent and she's gaining some fame as a contract girl. It's a win/win for her and the studio.

But given that so many models at GDP are 'one and done' I suspect that there is no exclusivity contract. It wouldn't make sense for either party. If the girl was exploring the possibility of getting into the business in a professional way there are lots of sites that would pay for that. I doubt that a model who wanted to explore that as a career opportunity would be willing to say that she'd not work for anyone else. That would end her career even before it started. From the site's perspective it wouldn't make sense either. Having the first scene of a popular model would drive business to GDP. If I discovered a model I like a lot did her first scene at GDP I guarantee you I'd join to get that scene. I can guarantee that because I've done it in the past.

I think the most likely reason that the girls on GDP never pop up anywhere else is because they want to experiment a bit and have no intention of doing anything else. Other sites feature models like this too - Exploited College Girls is another good example.

On a darker note, I have read that GDP may use some deceptive practices such that the models want to experiment a bit but aren't told it's for a well-known site. There have been allegations that the girls think the scenes won't be on a site or if it is it'll be on some obscure foreign site.

Bottom line: I admit I'm only speculating, but I think it is unlikely that the girls who appear on GDP are contractually prohibited from appearing on other sites.

killbillvol69 All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

^Lucy Pinder
18635 Posts
4/08
Posted - Feb 27 2019 : 11:30PM
If the lawsuit against GDP is to be believed, the girls were tricked/manipulated into shooting porn and so most would never want to shoot again.

So, yeah, they're exclusive in the sense that the girls don't work for anyone else, but for a very bad reason.

I'll send everyone to our thread on their legal troubles and you can discuss it further there.

Amateur porn site, "GirlsDoPorn" sued




Jump To: