Under no circumstances do I believe that an adult entertainer can't be a great parent. I'm sure most are. But, is "prego porn" tantamount to "pimping" the child? Isn't the child (pregnancy) the turn-on? Does anyone find this genre disturbing and/or detrimental to the child?
It would be abuse if it would harm the child. As long as the sex is gentle and not too rough for the pregnant woman to handle, I see no abuse. I think the point of this genre is the fact that women look very hot when pregnant so it's still about the women, not the child.
[Link]
greenhouse Deactivated User
138 Posts 1/07
Posted - Jun 6 2007 : 2:12PM
I would only find a problem with it if the man started saying shit like "oh yeah, I can feel your baby rubbing against my cock"...or the woman saying "oh yeah, you're getting two for one." That's pretty sick shit right there. Other than that, I don't have a problem with prego-porn. mod: extraneous quote removed Edited by - hardware on 6/6/2007 2:14:06 PM
Given that you can legally kill an unborn child, I'm not sure even "pimping" an unborn child would be considered illegal. And although I'm repulsed by the thought of someone making comments like greenhouse did above during the filming of a sex scene with a pregnant woman, I really wouldn't put it into "forbidden" territory. Unborn children have no legal rights....it may be "sick" porn but the law of the US at least has stated that it's ok to do with "it" what you please. It's not a him/her (legally) until after it's outside the birth canal. Pretty seriously messed up when you consider it....it's ok to kill an unborn child, but you can't abuse one. Edited by - Lubenluv on 6/6/2007 2:33:42 PM
No, an unborn baby have no social security ID and therefore no rights. Morally... I guess one could want it labeled child abuse. Silly as it sounds though. For me it's how women seem proud and horny at the same time during the pregnancy. The taboo of it.
Yes. I think it's a kinda disturbing. I'm no medical professional so I don't really know what the risks are but common sense would seem to indicate that anything that happens to the mother while she's pregnant could have untold consequences (good or bad) on the fetus. I find it kind of odd that some women will go to the extremes of not drinking coffee whilst pregnant but will participate in a gangbang. I don't get the appeal, either, honestly. I mean, I'm not really trying to people who like it. IF they do, that's their thing. Not mine.
That "pregnancy porn" is child abuse implies abortion is murder. I vote "no" on both counts, but making the case means starting a discussion that transcends porn, so I'll just leave it at that. Not my thing anyway.
Can we please stop posting such idiotic topics? Child Abuse?! What are you talking about? Are you pulling these topics out of your ass? Being attracted to pregnant women or even wanting to have sex with them has nothing to do with the child inside them. That's the last thing on their mind. That's like saying people who give anal sex are into scat..because you know...there is poop in there..somewhere. I'm sure husbands all over the world have sex with their pregnant wives all the time. Don't tell me they go without sex the whole 9 months. The idea that they only want to fuck their wives because they love pimping their child or love abusing it is crazy. The even thought of you thinking something along these lines doesn't make sense to me. I personally thing pregnant women are attactive sometimes. I don't know why this is. I don't think there is anything abnormal about this. It's sad that people even think that pregnant porn is only for "sick fucks". There is several reasons that pregnant porn is wrong, but not because she's pregnant. That's far from it.
I'm not here, this isn't happening! 2571 Posts 6/04
Posted - Jun 6 2007 : 5:47PM
Watching a pregnant girl getting fucked can be quit enjoyable. It depends on the woman. I saaw a japanese movie which was really hot. So I think it has nothing to do with child abuse.
I see nothing wrong with pregnant woman doing porn.As alot of you know pregnant woman are my favorite fetish im not getting off to her because theirs a kid in her.I just like the way her body looks something about the way the shape of her body is.Also when it comes down to collecting adult dvds its rare finding who ever you like pregnant because it doesnt last long. Why do people have to keep bringing this up its porn and its a fetish theirs nothing wrong with it. Bernard
Already discussed here , sex while pregnant is normally perfectly safe , of course if someone abuses or mistreat the woman will do the same to the baby she's carrying , but regular sex is no danger to the baby. However rough sex might be dangerous
It seems my use of the word "abuse" gave the wrong impression. My question was less about physical abuse and more about emotional abuse. I see it as a violation of the child's right to a clean slate in life. If a child grows up and wants to do porn, so be it. But if a parent brings a child on a porn set and involves the child in the production, I think it's kinda fucked up. I could deal with my mom doing porn, but my mom doing porn while she was carrying me I would feel was a violation of a basic bond. Is it asking too much, to expect a mother to spare their child that emotional baggage.
I still don't know if I would call it that, at least not in Japan. Since no harm came to the child. It's something i'd really have to think about. My initial reaction is that it most definitely is. If I had to choose i'd say yes for sure. I think bestiality is sickening and such a thing as you described is morally wrong. Why would some woman do that and how would the kid feel knowing later on in life that his own mother did such things while they were inside her? Honestly, I don't even want to think about such things. In Japan a company called Wildside produced a pregnant movie with a "bonus" scene containing a real life child birth. A child birth and nothing more. It was not meant to be include as a "porn" scene, but as a documentary in addition to the main movie. Even despite the fact it's not in the actual movie, it's still wrong. That sort of stuff should not be allowed. I hardly doubt any such thing as a bonus in a porn movie is just for "informational" purposes. Maybe to some. In some cases it may be good to see for educational purposes, but it does not belong in such movies. To think that there exists people out there that would get aroused by such things is just disturbing.
Unless I was informed wrong (and I'm asking for someone who can confirm) In Australia a judge stopped the announced pornset of a girl fucked in the ass while giving birth to her child now that's a real abuse Edited by - Laurie Cameron Fan on 6/6/2007 7:06:25 PM
This thread is one step away from becoming an abortion fight.
[Link]
greenhouse Deactivated User
138 Posts 1/07
Posted - Jun 6 2007 : 7:45PM
...and to think, I thought I'd heard it all.
[Link]
john thomas Deactivated User
1168 Posts 6/06
Posted - Jun 6 2007 : 7:52PM
I am reminded of the Earl of Rochester's admiring tribute to Nell Gwynn: She was so exquisite a whore That in the belly of her mother She placed her cunt so right before Her father fucked them both together. But those words were written in more innocent times. Edited by - john thomas on 6/6/2007 7:53:03 PM
Ah yes, the "innocent times" when women could be traded as property and a landowner held rights to the rape of any female who was born within their boundaries. Those were the good old days...... Edited by - Lubenluv on 6/6/2007 8:00:16 PM
yeah, it wasn't edited for content. hence the "extraneous quote removed". he was cutting out some of the needless quoting that you did in your post. hardware does that.
OK, reality check.... How many of the male posters in this thread have ever even fucked a pregnant woman before? (counts only a few hands up) Ok then.....SERIOUS REALITY check.... Of those with your hands up, how many of you have a cock big enough to even pose a threat to her cervix, let alone the baby? (sounds of crickets chirping) That's what I thought. Thank you. Class Dismissed.
Hi, I generally don´t think that a woman who has sex (gentle and not hard ) while being pregnant is hurting her child. I just think (even though there is obviously a market for it) she shouldn´t do it. Pregnancy is a very special time in any womans life. She should enjoy it not explore it on video for masturbation purposes. Cube
Seems to me men are way more uptight about it than women. That the woman wants to have sex and the guy feeling uncomfortable with it. I think it's natural... if you get your girl knocked up... your job is done for now... there's no 'reason' to fuck her while she's pregnant. When I saw my the first photo of a pregnant fashion model, I was hooked... but pregnant porn is nowhere close to that. I think it's a very beautiful and very rare state that should be appreciated more. And it's so very personal for the woman, she's sharing something that she feels so strongly about. I'm sure there's bad perverts and sick guys you'd like to keep away from though... But still, it's not about the child, THAT would be sick. It's about the woman.
if the foetus is developed past the stage where it can be aborted (when it's not really a human being) then it is another life, and, legally, shouldn't be allowed in porn. at least that's how i see it.
You said that the child shouldn't be allowed in porn after a certain period of time I said he's not, but his mother is Edited by - hardware on 6/9/2007 6:03:21 PM