Reviewers Recommend
Rissa Wants Some CockRissa Wants Some Cock - review by Sean DPS
Starring: Rissa May. Read review
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 462 > Is there a "humiliation fetish" genre?
AuthorPost
Offender
Member

158 Posts
12/06
Posted - Mar 26 2008 : 10:14PM
A while back I rented the movie Mrs. Bitch from Adult DVD Empire, because one of my new favorite stars, Mikayla, is in it. It looked like a great way to see more of her, too, since it looked like a lot of it was up close and personal [;))] .
Which it was. Basically the movie is two long scenes; in each an actress talks to the camera like it's her boyfriend or husband, telling him what a loser jerk he is and how she'd rather get it on with this other guy who's in the scene with her. And there's petting, oral, and everything BUT actual sex. Mikayla's scene ends with her jerking off two guys until they cum, and I think that's how the other girl's scene ends too.
This is the first porn movie I've ever seen where there's no sex. Is this a fetish genre I didn't know about or something?
Further, when I wrote a review about it saying I liked the movie but there was no actual sex, they never posted it. I felt I should warn the other customers...
ma meeshka
Iconoclastic Member

3939 Posts
4/06
Posted - Mar 27 2008 : 1:11AM
sounds like a neat idea.
not that i'd buy it, but still...
Bob All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

5516 Posts
3/03
Posted - Mar 27 2008 : 1:19AM
Would a "humiliation fetish" movie be different from a movie in which humiliation is an aspect?
For instance, Joey Silvera's strap-on movies have male humiliation themes.
Loraine
Senior Member

1559 Posts
3/04
Posted - Mar 27 2008 : 6:06AM
Isn't a hand job sex?
ninja1
Senior Member

2939 Posts
1/08
Posted - Mar 27 2008 : 2:52PM
Are you asking about the "sexless" content?
Or are you asking about the humiliation theme?
I have seen movies which don't have hetero vaginal or anal penetration; it's not all that rare. But there are usually some sort of clues in the title or description or boxcover.
I've never had the "no sex" be a total surprise.
I have seen "humiliation" clips offered by some amateur webmodels, but never seen a commercial dvd devoted to it.
 
ma meeshka
Iconoclastic Member

3939 Posts
4/06
Posted - Mar 28 2008 : 8:20AM
no, it's a job. sex isn't a job, it's a reward.
Shagdog
Member

Houston
626 Posts
1/07
Posted - Mar 28 2008 : 9:46AM
Sexually repression has damaged people in our society to the point “shame and humiliation” has become their sex life.
We have reduced some member of our society to rubbing shit all over themselves and eating shit to full fill their desires for shame and humiliation.
They find it impossible to respect uninhabited sexually vibrate women that share sex with them. Or appreciate the ladies of porn.
They fear a sexually open and free society.
Edited by - Shagdog on 3/28/2008 10:37:42 AM
Bob All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

5516 Posts
3/03
Posted - Mar 28 2008 : 10:42AM
Is it your position, then, that fucking animals indicates a "normal", healthy, and robust attitude toward sex whereas playing with shit or having a humiliation fetish embodies the opposite?
Please elaborate further.
Shagdog
Member

Houston
626 Posts
1/07
Posted - Mar 28 2008 : 11:30AM
My interest and position on bestiality is with the law only. I do not have a interest in personally havening sex with a animal. I have seen some videos of women and dogs and women and horses. But I didn't have an interest beyond curiosity.
I really really have no curiosity in scat. I've never watched a scat scene or will I do so. But I don't believe in laws preventing people from watching it. Please just label it.
My position is that if we raised our kids with a healthy knowledge of sex, and that it's acceptable behaver for humans to have sex.
That sexual desires are normal and it is acceptable to seek out and accept sex from humans. That there is no reason to hide sex from other humans.
All we're talking about is sex. Why is shame and humiliation a part of it.

Shagdog
Member

Houston
626 Posts
1/07
Posted - Mar 28 2008 : 12:16PM
If you’re still interested here is more of my rant on a sexually repressed society.
The messages we sent our kids are ludicrous.
We only sexually repress our girls. We never sexually repress our boys.
But we teach our boys that sexually vibrate girls are to be ridiculed as sluts and whores. And should be shun as unfit for wives and mothers.
We teach them inhibitions. Then we make drugs and alcohol available to them to drop their inhibitions.
In every high school you have boys giving girls drugs and alcohol in attempt to have sex with them. Boys and girls are becoming drug addicts and alcoholics when all they wanted to do is have sex.
We send the message loud and clear. That bad boys get to have sex and good boys don’t get to have sex. Then we wonder why our boys are acting like thugs. Our girl who also want to have sex, want to hang out with the bad boys. And we wonder why.
We give a 16 year old boys desperate to have sex. A car, money and a street full of crack whores and wonder where all the STD”s are coming from.
We as a society built this wall of shame, humiliation and fear of public ridicule between men and women. To stop what sex?
Bob All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

5516 Posts
3/03
Posted - Mar 28 2008 : 12:36PM
^^^
You still haven't answered the question I actually posed. I did not ask a legal question. I did not advocate sexual repression. If you missed my question, I'll restate it:
You intimated that both a humiliation fetish and a scat fetish are abnormal and unhealthy, whereas a bestiality fetish is not. Is this correct? If so, please distinguish these three fetishes on principled grounds.
nietzsche
Deactivated User

5470 Posts
8/03
Posted - Mar 28 2008 : 12:36PM
My whole life is a "humiliation fetish" film.
Shagdog
Member

Houston
626 Posts
1/07
Posted - Mar 28 2008 : 1:04PM
I have never said bestiality was normal or even said I condone people doing it. Anywhere on this board.
bestiality to me is tolerable, but not interesting
humiliation fetish is laughible
Scat is repulsive
Edited by - Shagdog on 3/28/2008 1:08:30 PM
Shagdog
Member

Houston
626 Posts
1/07
Posted - Mar 28 2008 : 1:06PM
Sometime I feel the same way.lol Maybe too much art imitating life. lol
Bob All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

5516 Posts
3/03
Posted - Mar 28 2008 : 3:35PM
Oh really?

In another thread, shagdog wrote:

and
and
and
and
and
and
.
Hmmmmm. It looks to me like you think it's normal, you condone it, and you're interested in it. If so, why the shame in admitting it?
 
Shagdog
Member

Houston
626 Posts
1/07
Posted - Mar 28 2008 : 4:51PM
Bob What is your point I even defended your right to eat shit. Which do you prefer to eat shit with peanuts or whole kernel corn.
What I stated was facts that are well known about bestiality.
I never said what I believe.
Fact is a lady and her dog does make a sexy videos. A lot sexy than guy sitting eating shit.
No shame here. lol
But Bob even in uninhabited sexually free world People will still be disgusted with you for eating shit. So your perversion of shame and humiliation will remain.
Now come on give me that shit eatin grin. lol

Edited by - Shagdog on 3/28/2008 5:09:45 PM

Bob All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

5516 Posts
3/03
Posted - Mar 28 2008 : 5:15PM
I don't eat shit, fool. Not literally and not figuratively.
I do, however, think it's interesting to point out the radical inconsistencies in your positions as well as your hypocrisy.
Bob All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

5516 Posts
3/03
Posted - Mar 28 2008 : 5:16PM
My work here is done. Be seeing ya.
skronker
Notable Legendary Icon

Scopophiliac
9780 Posts
9/02
Posted - Mar 28 2008 : 5:38PM
NO shit
Shagdog
Member

Houston
626 Posts
1/07
Posted - Mar 28 2008 : 6:05PM
Sorry to disappoint you fool No hypocrite here.
You not a shit eater? Why did you get so upset about me not thinking it's normal lol
ma meeshka
Iconoclastic Member

3939 Posts
4/06
Posted - Mar 29 2008 : 1:06AM
"we"? who is we?
since when have people with a scatological fetish been 'reduced' to that? what's reductive about a fetish? i'd have thought that was expansive, if anything. limiting, possibly, but that's a different issue.
"desires for shame and humiliation"? i fail to see this correlation. granted, i don't have a degree in scatology, but i never thought it was about "shame and humiliation". i thought it was about shit.
Blink
Deactivated User

78 Posts
2/08
Posted - Mar 29 2008 : 2:32AM
Psychiatric definition of fetishism:
"fetishism in psychiatry, a paraphilia in which erotic interest and satisfaction are centered on an inanimate object or a specific, nongenital part of the anatomy."
(The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition 2007)
Yes, I'm aware that fetishism nowadays often refers to "something that a person likes very strongly in a sexual context." I prefer to be more specific, though; sadomasochism is not fetishism.
Savoy All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Sucker for Sinners
1844 Posts
12/06
Posted - Mar 29 2008 : 4:53AM
Femdom. Google it.



Jump To: