Texas Presley's scene was totally ruined by bad camera work. You don't get to see her completely in any shots. Total disappointment especially since she's left the business.
wow, thanks for the positive remark on my camera work. sorry if I didn't approach the scene the way you would have liked me to, but I tried to keep the main focus on what was at hand. her big tits, after all it is a big tit show. like jacks big ass show I try to keep the camera work isolated on the body part being showcased. If you want more of the girl, or texas in this case, check out jacks teen america. sorry, not sure what volume at the moment, but I'll find out and get back to you. I approach every series differently. I hope you can find the one you like, or learn to look at each one in it's own unique way. If texas ever comes back I'll make sure to shoot her again, but in a series that allows me more freedom to provide you with the coverage your looking for.
That's not uncommon in a fetish-styled release, but I agree that it would be nice to see a few complete shots in the scene. On the more positive side, it's very nice to hear that Robby's trying to give each of his series a slightly different flavor.
"Vegetarianism for me is about saying ‘yes’ to things - even meat." - Coupling
Well, it's kind of like Cum Drippers. You know it's going to be about facials and cumshots. Why would you expect to see any more of anything else? You buy Jack's Big Tit Show to see big tits.
I find this a problem with most directors, like aiming the camera the wrong way, like too much focus/close-up shots and not a lot of complete shots.That doesn't make sense because Buttman's focus is also on butts but he still gets all the right angles.
sure, and buttman is buttman. in my opinion he is the best. I'm the biggest fan. but buttman shoots only hardcore. I have to shoot both hard and soft at the same time. wich means sometimes my angles are not always flattering. but we need the shot or the running time, all things considered i think we do a really great job of providing entertainment. I'ts supposed to be fun. If you want to see an all hardcore movie with solid angles check out the control series or hard candy. Hope they are more pleasing to you. try to remember that for a director, camera man or a company, there are many different variables that come into play when completing a project. and not all are the same, or meant to compete with each other. And to me that's what makes porn so great today. We have so many choices. just enjoy. try it.]
My remarks were not personal. They were just critical comments about the camerawork.
The scene was maybe 8-9 minutes long, I don't know. And the majority of it was with the lense about 6 inches away from her chest the entire time. There was one complete shot which was taken above her head looking straight down.
I wouldn't have called it a complete "fetish" film. Even in that case I want to see a good amount of sex shown well. It's a shame, she is so hot and she won't be on camera anymore. More and more films are being ruined by bad camerawork.
Another critique I made this weekend was with North Pole 62 with the Tory Lane and Peter North scene (which is also maybe 10-11 minutes). There's about 2 minutes of BJ and you can't even see it because the camera's to her back. If there is anyone I want to see give Peter North a BJ it's got to be Tory Lane and I was really bummed out.
All For Us - review by Captain Jack
Posted - Apr 15 2006 : 11:58AM