I just recieved Jack's Leg Show in the mail,and I must say I was really impressed.I've never really been a fan of Digital Playground,but with Teagan Presley doing a foot fetish scene,I just had to get it.Her scene is one of the best foot fetish scenes I've ever seen,as a matter of fact.I've longed to see some decent shots of her feet over the last few years,and this has plenty,whether you're a toe or sole lover.Robby D.'s camerawork is stellar throughout,as is the editing.
The other scenes are great,too,especially Maya Hills' and Alexis Love's.I salute Robbie D.,Digital Playground,and Teagan for making my wish come true.Thanks so much.
DP has been putting out some great stuff in the last year or so. They went from a studio that I'd maybe check out once in a while to one where I look forward to almost every release they put out. I love how Robby's working the Jack's Playground series around different fetishes with tits, ass, teens, milfs, and now legs.
"Vegetarianism for me is about saying ‘yes’ to things - even meat." - Coupling
i agree, DP has gotten Way better over the last couple years...I like the sexual freak series and the Deeper series....They also usually have really cool music
Eventhough I always shy away from movies from DP I'm thinking of buying this one for the foot-stuff. But if Robby D directed this movie than why is it called Jack's Leg Show? Who is Jack?
Thanks for the info. Too bad they didn't get another persona because now it's very confusing with Jack Napier and his series and the name Jack in his titles.
Robby d is the only directorial talent on their roster that is worth viewing. they don't have nic andrews and his overblown productions but they have celeste and everyone knows how i feel about her. i'll be sure to check it out cuz i just got it in and i see Teagan looking smokin on the cover and i want to see it...i'm just fearful its a condom only scene and i don't want to see her do that.
I thought I'd written out an explanation in this thread but apparently not. I dunno. Maybe I deleted it or something or changed my mind about posting it. But I'm pretty sure I have explained this a few times. I'll have to look it up. I'll see if I can post a link.
OK...never mind about the link. I couldn't find what I was looking for but here's a brief (as brief as possible) explanation.
When you see foot fetish stuff, what do you see? Do you see feet in awkward looking angles shot from halfway across the room? No. You see foot worship. You see people kissing them, sucking on the toes, caressing them, masturbating themselves with them. You see guys cuming on feet.
Where is the leg equivalent? It doesn't exist as far as I can tell. I want to see men (and maybe women too) kissing and fondling and sucking on legs. I want to see the legs as the main focus of a video. Stocking worship is not leg worship. It's stocking worship. Foot worship is not leg worship. It's foot worship. I don't mind that foot fetish is out there. But I'm always on the lookout for leg stuff and it pisses me off when they advertise a foot fetish video as a leg fetish video. Foot fetish is OK and it's even OK mixed with what I'd like to see but when it'd 90% foot and stocking, don't sell it as "Leg this" or "Leg that".
What do breast-themed movies consist of? Tittie fucking and fondling and sucking. Right? I just don't get it. Legs are beautiful and wonderful and sensual and yet they're virtually ignored.
I'm sorry. I don't like to rant. I really don't and I know I sound a bit crazy and obsessed here but I've been looking for this for years and I haven't found one example of it.
Edited by - randomprecision on 2/27/2007 10:16:52 PM