I am a fan of Japanese bukkake/swallowing videos. They will have 100 or more guys filling up some chick. I have noticed that on average these guys shoot a greater volume of cum than the average porn actor here in the USA. And these are REAL cumshots, not fake ones. Has anyone else noticed this? Maybe something in their diet...
[Link]
nietzsche Deactivated User
5470 Posts 8/03
Posted - Apr 30 2005 : 5:55PM
I've noticed. I think they save up more than American guys.
Yeah, I think somewhere on the internet that for the old MVG title Fuji No Jin they had to save up their semen for a few days. That gave their cum in the mouths and bowl a thick and foamy effect. Of course she did swish it around in her mouth first for awhile.
I've definitely noticed this. Some of guys in the bukkake movies can't even let out a drop. Perhaps they were shooting too much porn that day.
I think maybe another reason is that the american performers are real porn stars in most cases, where the people in some japanese bukkake aren't porn stars and maybe aren't getting any often or just not that much. Hey, it's an idea! My guess is that very, very few of the male performers are real male porn stars over there.
It could also be their diet. Maybe that's why so many girls over in Japan are more likely to swallows hundreds of loads of cum. Perhaps they have better tasting semen. :)
There is this Japanese bukkake title from MVG that has black men in it from the USA. They just can't get any of the stuff out. Like just a little bit and it's quite sad compared to what the Japanese can do. It's just strange.
Is there a store in America where we can buy bukkake movies from Japan which are uncensored? I don't buy Japanese movies because the genitals are censored so for me it's a waste of money. That's why I can't confirm if guys from Japan can shoot bigger loads.
Fantadream has 2 released I believe. One of them was an MVG title. I'm not quite sure of their website, but it should be pretty easy to find. But seriously, have you tried to watch a censored title? I mean, a REALLY good bukkake movie with censoring? Most people who are really into bukkake don't mind at all. The focus is usually on the cumshot, the face or whatever else. And believe it or not there is some bukkake movies with like no actual sex (err, well "oral" sex, but that doens't count).
They way I look at it is, don't jerk off everyday, drink tons of water, take zinc, hold off till the big one. Works for me. build up that load. Although there are declining sperm counts worldwide, and mens balls are shrinking - that's what I read. Did 70's and 80's porn have bigger loads? Some old classics that I have got the guys seems to shoot tons out. I remember seeing this footage from the 70's of a girl giving a guy head, he cums and the the sperm is flooding out of her nose!
[Link]
nietzsche Deactivated User
5470 Posts 8/03
Posted - May 2 2005 : 8:13PM
Not only can you not buy them uncensored, you cannot buy them legally at all. As for MVG, they have no site, at least not one that has their catalog.
I have noticed it a lot. I have some uncensored Japanese AV dvd's. One guy cums a ton inside one of the girls.
I did see a doco on declining sperm rates in western men, there was this doctor that measures testicles - there is belief that testicles are getting smaller.
here is a link re the topic: http://www.babyhopes.com/articles/causes-low-sperm-count.html
To me it seems some guys shoot big loads and some don't... japanese, american whatever. How the guys get selected is probably the main issue. Young men produces generally more semen than older men, and diet makes a diffirence in thickness of cum. I've seen a japanese bukkake flick where the guys gets a special drink and some pills - most likely supposed to make the cum increase in volume or/and in thickness.
If I compare most of the Jap-bukkake I've seen with A good source of iron, I'd say that the later got bigger loads. And then, Japanese girls got smaller mouths I think. It feels pretty weird discussing this though...
Innocent Girlfriend Rewards Him With Pussy - review by Captain Jack
Posted - Apr 30 2005 : 5:51PM