[Link]
Introducing Brandi Swan| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| Mojo Deactivated User 1223 Posts 9/03 |  Posted - Aug 23 2015 : 7:03AMARGH!!! I hate it that most of these vids don't properly identify the porn girls! Anyways, I might keep this thread for future IDs when they come about. First one is this porn girl. I'm not sure, but is her name Angel Wicky?   [Link] |
| JigglyBoobs Senior Member 1614 Posts 3/12 | Posted - Aug 23 2015 : 7:23AM [Link] |
| Mojo Deactivated User 1223 Posts 9/03 | Posted - Sep 12 2015 : 2:41PM 1.   2.  3.  [mod edit: image removed. see the image policy. No cropped, blurred or digitally manipulated images of sex acts. Don't take an image that would otherwise not comply with this policy and modify the offending region from the image. If the original image doesn't comply with this policy it can't be used.]  4.   5.   Edited by - Mojo on 9/13/2015 12:04:02 PM Edited by - killbillvol69 on 9/13/2015 3:06:23 PM [Link] |
| Lord Lucifer Deactivated User Sins of the flesh 1378 Posts 7/10 | Posted - Sep 12 2015 : 2:56PM Porn Stars Rock My Underworld! [Link] |
| JigglyBoobs Senior Member 1614 Posts 3/12 | Posted - Sep 12 2015 : 6:01PM Edited by - JigglyBoobs on 9/12/2015 6:03:03 PM [Link] |
| Mojo Deactivated User 1223 Posts 9/03 | Posted - Sep 13 2015 : 12:00PM Edited by - Mojo on 9/14/2015 6:12:03 AM [Link] |
| JigglyBoobs Senior Member 1614 Posts 3/12 | Posted - Sep 13 2015 : 1:09PM If you'd stop pointing the accusatory finger at the mods and drop the flippant attitude, you'd have realised that images with sex acts, censored or not, aren't banned here for shits and giggles. As you're so fond of observing, images that are allowed in sex mags are allowed because those who published them have records of the model being at least 18 years of age when the content was captured and that she consented to their publication. Those records are required by law otherwise the publisher couldn't go to print with those magazines. Since the site owners have no such records, they could be prosecuted if their image server was found to have explicit content. Is that so difficult to take in, admit you made a mistake and move on or is it just a lot easier to accuse the mods of having "Victorian" sensibilities and look like an idiot when it was clearly explained why the image policy is in place? I was actually going to help out with one of those women when you removed the images but I'll now leave that to whomever has "mug" tattooed on their forehead.... Edited by - JigglyBoobs on 9/13/2015 1:11:12 PM [Link] |
killbillvol69  All-Star Member ^Lucy Pinder 18631 Posts 4/08 | Posted - Sep 13 2015 : 3:08PM Your anger should be directed at the US government, not the owners or moderators of this site. [Link] |
| Mojo Deactivated User 1223 Posts 9/03 | Posted - Oct 5 2015 : 1:38PM If any members have any ideas who the girls are from the pics I was allowed to show I'd be grateful.  P.S. What about links? Edited by - Mojo on 10/5/2015 1:39:40 PM [Link] |
| killbillvol69 All-Star Member ^Lucy Pinder 18631 Posts 4/08 | Posted - Oct 5 2015 : 7:47PM [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |