I dun like Aurora. She's the least attractive of all girls on this film! Double anal? I hate that shit! That's extreme!
This film should be good. I hope Jenna Haze, Kaylee & Tommi Rose gets it!
-The Incredible Kitchie Laurico-
2002, BlacaneseMale productionz
[Link]
caneboy Deactivated User
New York City 115 Posts 1/02
Posted - Jan 30 2002 : 3:51PM
Just got back from my spot in Manhattan where i picked this up. I'm gonna watch it soon and try and get up a review later today or tomorrow at the latest. I haven't done a review yet but ill try my best to give some of yall a feel for this dvd.
Poor Turkey running for her life with Christmas Hat 3713 Posts 9/01
Posted - Jan 30 2002 : 4:35PM
I will drive in to Manhattan this evening to pick up the Flesh Hunter DVD as well as Matador 15. I will also pick up assman 19 and Rampage 3 DVD. Yoo Hoo -- looks like a good night for me.
Poor Turkey running for her life with Christmas Hat 3713 Posts 9/01
Posted - Jan 30 2002 : 5:24PM
Yes, I saw in AVN new release as well as in snatch.com that Rampage 3 is out in DVD together with Flesh Hunter (of course). I am just heading out the door now to go to Manhattan.
Nice review, Caneboy! You did an excellent job of reporting on the specifics. Hope to see more from you in the future!
[Link]
caneboy Deactivated User
New York City 115 Posts 1/02
Posted - Jan 31 2002 : 11:32AM
Thanks Yoga.
VictoriO, I can't see why you don't like Aurora. I guess you've seen her elsewhere where she didn't impress you but she is pretty damn hot here. I liked this cast (at least based on there pictures on the front) a little better then the "Ass Worship"(although i really liked bella) but "Ass Worship" was more focused and was the better movie. Especially if you like the anal and in the year 2002 who doesn't like the anal? Don't get me wrong, its still a good movie and I'm still happy i picked it up.
CANE...judging from your review here, it sounds like it is weak. Sounds like Ass Worship is a lot better. Flesh Hunter has 5 sexy-as-shit females but most of them do no anal & I hear the sex is weak (Jules Jordan does have very weak sex)!
Tommi Rose, Jenna Haze, Krystal, Luna AND Kaylee are so, so sexy but it sounds like it is all weak here. Not enough anal can be a BIG problem, at the same time... a movie like Let's Get Fucked, Please 1 doesn't have a lot of anal but the sex is super hot that I didn't even care. I gave that a A+. I, now, don't think that Flesh Hunter will be like that, though (I am putting Flesh Hunter in the same league as Please 1 because... A) Great female cast. B) Evil Angel products. C) Not all anal). For one, Jules Jordan has sex with most of the females & his sex sucks (no offense)!
Well, does Flesh Hunter have any ass worship (I mean, like incredible butt shots & that sort of thing)?
I also was able to buy this disc yesterday, and personally I think it is "THE BOMB" (very good). Its a completely different animal than "Ass Worship" but then, its not titled "Ass Worship". I like to see b/g scenes with no anal also, although anal is great, there are still alot of hot females out there that dont do it. I loved the cast, Jules uses the hottest females out there and jenna DOES get a good ass fucking and HUGE facial, i'm entirely happy. Jules may not be an erik everhard or lexington steele (but who is?, these guys are like superhuman!), but I still think he fucks the girls good, and his cumshots are worth the price of the dvd alone. It didnt have as much tease, but damn with 6 scenes (who has six scenes these days?), i'm sure alot had to be taken out, theres more than enough to satisfy everyone. I dont think jules is capable of putting out a "weak" product, or evil angel for that matter, so you guys saying it sounds "weak" is ridiculous. Hopefully i will find some time to do my own review. Caneboy summed it up pretty good, but i would have rated it a little higher. LETS GET READY FOR ASS WORSHIP #2!!!!!
[Link]
caneboy Deactivated User
New York City 115 Posts 1/02
Posted - Jan 31 2002 : 1:47PM
Don't get me wrong, I like it and think it is far from weak. This was my first review so you don't know this but I won't just pass out 4.5 and 5 ratings to everything that I like. I'll reserve those for the most elite dvd's I see. So many people have such inflated rating systems (like my man Steve K )on this site that it almost seems like a 4 isn't that good. A "4" is very good. This is probably even closer to a 4.25 IMO. Just because I pointed out some stuff that I thought could have been better doesn't mean it was a disappointment. I did think the scene with Tommi Rose was kind of boring even though Lex makes it somewhat worth watching. I'll just mute it next time i watch it so I don't have to hear her go on ad nauseum about Lex's "big monster cock." If Luna and Krystal would have taken it up the ass, and they cut the scene with Tommi and had more intro/tease with the other girls with those "pop up comments" I would have given this a perfect 5. Also the extras could have been a lot better. I'd rather see more natural behind the scenes stuff with everybody hanging out. I'd like an interview with Jules or stuff with EE and Lex just hanging out shooting the shit with the camerea or the girls.
I haven't seen Flesh Hunter, Caneboy, but for what it's worth, I thought your critique was both informative and even-handed. The rating system has been the topic of much previous discussion here at the forum. Personally, I have yet to give a 5 star rating. (I did just give Lex the Impaler 4.5 stars, which is a tie for the highest score I've awarded. The review has been submitted and is pending Steph's approval.) I think the most we can hope for is consistency within each individual's ratings, not between reviewers.
[Link]
Steve K. Deactivated User
840 Posts 11/01
Posted - Jan 31 2002 : 3:28PM
YogaGrrl,
Nice review..I am getting Lex The Impaler tomorrow so can't wait to see it. Also I will be reviewing Flesh Hunter on saturday and I am sure it will get a perfect 5.
Jules Rules!
[Link]
caneboy Deactivated User
New York City 115 Posts 1/02
Posted - Jan 31 2002 : 4:06PM
Way to go into it unbiased and with an open mind Steve. You do realize that handing out 5's and 4.5 on damn near everything you review and making comments like this before you even see the damn movie cheapens your opinions right? Look at your track record. How can that much stuff be "perfect" or "near perfect?" Set higher standards and maybe your reviews will start to carry a little weight.
Edited by - caneboy on Jan 31 2002
[Link]
Steve K. Deactivated User
840 Posts 11/01
Posted - Jan 31 2002 : 4:50PM
Caneboy,
Just because you like couple films and hardcore is not you thing doesn't mean that I don't set a standard for my reviewing. I give 5's to movies that are ones that are keepers for me.
[Link]
caneboy Deactivated User
New York City 115 Posts 1/02
Posted - Jan 31 2002 : 5:17PM
Steve, Why do you think I don't like hardcore? I love hardcore. And I equally can enjoy "couples films" as well. I don't think theres anything "hardcore" about "Flesh Hunter" though. With the exception of the double anal scene which happened to be far and away my faveorite scene in the movie, I don't think there was anything hardcore about "Flesh Hunter." Thats one of the reasons why I was a little disappointed. Jules does 3 of the scenes himself and there is NOTHING hardcore about him at least in this movie. 3 of the 6 scenes didn't have anal. I can enjoy a couples flick and judge them seperately for what they are. Max Hardcore is hardcore, Jules Jordan isn't. Don't get it twisted. Why don't you just be patient and wait and watch the movie before putting me on blast for not having your liberal rating system where I slap everything I see with a 4.5 or a 5.
I like Hardcore films too steve and I really couldn't care less if you give them a 10 score to everything you review but please man give me something I can use like letting us know about anals and dps.
you guys are getting ridiculous, people are arguing over a perfectly good HARDCORE movie, I'm sure the only person who can actually comment on it is caneboy, who said he is glad he picked it up and it was a good dvd, or myself, and I thoroughly enjoyed it, and it was defiately hardcore (double anal, 3 anal scenes, gapes, atm) I would define that as hardcore. The first scene has a little different vibe to it. This is a different series than "Ass Worship", it would be lame if every jules movie was an "Ass Worship". If this wasnt for you then stick to the ass worship series. Unless there is a freakish male performer (everhard,lex steele) in the scene, usually the guys get slammed, who would you rather see dave hardman? kyle stone? Jules gives us the angles, he initiates the ass to mouth, and he certainly blasts the chicks, I do not go out of my way to buy movies based on the male talent, I am way more interested in the females in the movie. What is so hardcore about max? his cowboy hat? his boots? the angles in his movies are horrible. The best scene in ass worship was with belladonna, and she got fucked real good and jules was behind it.. caneboy still gave FH a 4 is that really something to argue about, let everyone judge it on their own, that is whats great about porn, people are into different things let them decide for themselves and rate it what they want. Remember these are only personal opinions, no one has a reason to "inflate" their ratings.
Actually, CANEBOY has a point! Jules Jordan really isn't hardcore. YET...Ass Worship was hardcore and with his Bottom Feeders series, there's usually 2 out of 4 of the females who steal the show & whose scenes are really hardcore!
Bottom Feeders: Adriana Sage & Sky stole the show. Although Sky's scene wasn't really, really hardcore like Adriana's scene, Sky rocks!
Bottom Feeders 2: Jewel De'Nyle's scene was a bomb! Brittany Baer's scene was good as well. Jewel De'Nyle smokes in just about every movie that she is in! Bottom line!
So...honestly, some of Jules movies aren't truly hardcore, to be honest! In a way, his movies are like...glamour sex! Yes, some of the sex in his films are hardcore, but it's all... glamour sex... like a Euro Angels movie, or even some John Leslie movies (without the classiness)!
At the same time, I love what he does unlike John Leslie & some of the Euro Angels movies (NOT the HARDBALL movies)! The glamour actually works in his movies! At the same time, SOME of it can be weak, especially when HE has sex with the females (no offense, again)!
caneboy all I want to say is that your review is great,do not change anything about the way you write your reviews in the future,I really like how you started every scene when the girl didn't take it up the ass (NO ANAL),....sometimes other reviewers all they said is how great,..how hot,..how kick ass the movie is but do not bother to say what the hell the girls do.....I think a review should be about giving helpfull information not grades 'cos sex is subjective what I like maybe you don't like,what is hot maybe sucks to others and viceversa,..so to me you are doing fine,..Thank you
I just want to chime in here that I agree with canboy 100%. I see so many 4.5s and 5s that there is no real point of reference. I am almost positive that the majority of readers here would not rate all of these movies so highly... I find it kind of sticky (no pun intended) - I mean I'm way too lazy to take the time to do a review so in that regard I am very appreciative of the people who do reviews. However, the ratings leave a lot to be desired. I have to kindly disagree with Wally and Big Mike about their reviewing techniques - a review is all about opinion, or at least some type of judgement. When I read a ten paragraph review that is nothing but a play-by-play until the very end it offers me very little. Describing what happens in a scene is necessary, but if that is all you do then what the hell good is that? I mean a description like "standing anal into doggie anal into rcg anal" is so generic - it could be describing a great Evil Angel scene, or a crappy Metro scene. Please, when reviewing add some opinion, maybe at the end of each paragraph instead of just one summary at the end...OK - end of rant.
[Link]
caneboy Deactivated User
New York City 115 Posts 1/02
Posted - Feb 5 2002 : 5:41PM
Yeah BJ. When I read Big Mikes reviews I read the first paragraph and the last paragraph. I can't imagine anything more boring then reading a "play by play" or "blow by blow" description of each scene. What I want is a short general overview with comments. That is what makes a review a review. If your just giving the run down of what happened without injecting opinion they should be called summarys not reviews. Like book reports in elementary school. "And then....."
when I buy a DVD, I like to know what I'm getting. I can read a review saying it's the best, without play-by-play. But it turns out to be SHIT. So I type out a review of what goes on, if you don't like it, f**k off, don't read em.
I dont care to read long winded opinions on what is good, because I've read great reviews, which, in my opinion, turned out to be complete SHIT! I present the facts, and let you decide!!!
I don't put my opinion in until the end, if that's all you want, then read just that.
---I'd rather be anywhere but here, but I’m here and not anywhere---
I think when we start having a go at people's reviews it puts off other 'new-commers' from submitting their own reviews. Once I get some spare time (in about 6 months) I plan to 'attempt' to review a movie - I just hope my reviews don't get trashed like others have been!
I think its great that so many of you guys take time to submit their reviews. At the end of the day everyone has their own unique way of reviewing.
imagine how caneboy feels about MY reviews, then...
-The Incredible Kitchie Laurico-
2002, BlacaneseMale productionz
[Link]
caneboy Deactivated User
New York City 115 Posts 1/02
Posted - Feb 5 2002 : 6:05PM
Snowden don't worry about it. I just started submitting reviews. Nobody expects them to be Siskel and Ebert quality. BigMike before you decide if you're going to see a mainstream movie in the theatre do you read a few opinionated "REVIEWS" or do you read a summary of the movie or the screenplay from start to finish? "And then Swartznegger storms into the room and shoots the four armed guards. The first one he shot just below the heart, the second one between the eyes, the third with multiple chest shots and finally the fouth, in the back while he was running away." Do you know the difference between a review and a summary?
snowden porn, you couldn't have said it better. Don't be affraid to write a review. Just because some readers don't like me, that's their problem. I'm not gonna waste my hate on them.
if someone doesn't like my style then don't read em. No one is forcing you to participate in this forum or read my reviews.
It's just being a "raincoater" I prefer to know who gets what done to them and by whom! Rather than read someone saying it was the best or the worst. Because when all is said and done, opinions mean shit. I like to give the meat and potatoes and let you decide if you like it, without telling you you will like it.
That's why I hate to review DVDs that have been reviewed, because then I sound repetitive.
---I'd rather be anywhere but here, but I’m here and not anywhere---
---I'd rather be anywhere but here, but I’m here and not anywhere---
[Link]
caneboy Deactivated User
New York City 115 Posts 1/02
Posted - Feb 5 2002 : 6:16PM
VictoriO, I like your reviews a lot. You might be my favorite reviewer. At least my favorite prolific reviewer. Sometimes you are a little long winded for my short attention span but you do a great job of balencing your review with a run down of what happened as well as adding enough opinion and commentary to keep it interesting. Plus your funny as hell. Usually something you write has me laughing out loud.
Mike, Don't get so bent out of shape! You don't have to resort to name calling. You're so sensitive. Calm down big guy.
NOTE: I wrote this post before Mike edited from his post the part where he called me a "asshole." That explains the reference to "name calling."
oh yes a review that cares to ID who the fuckers are and what they do is a very good review in my book remember guys this is porn,is all about the girls a reviewer that after writing 10 or 100 lines all he said is how hot,kick ass,great the movies was and that's it looks more like a salesman to me. honestly who cares if the guy,gal likes the porn movie. like I said sex is subjective what I like maybe sucks to others,what is hot to me maybe is a piece of crap to the next guy.BUT yes there is a big but I understand why somebody NEW to porn would like to know opinions first, they are like kids in a candy store they will like anything and everything and because they can't buy the factory they really have to relate to somebody else opinion.in one word they don't know any better.
I decided to edit my reply because I typed it without thinking, I didn't mean that any one person is an asshole, in fact I might even consider myself one, since I love the female ass so much.
If you want opinions, here they are... -Evil Angel = the best there is. -Extreme Associates (Tom Byron) = a close second -Elegant Angel (Tom Byron) = another good choice -Red Light District, Anabolic, Diabolic = also good choices for nasty balls-to-the-wall-sex, but really haven't seen enough of their stuff to lend my opinion. -Vivid = crap -VCA = Good high budget DVDs, decent sex, could be so much better -Wicked = see VCA -Private = Very HOT, mostly Euro girls taking it in various holes, sometimes simultaneously, high budget epics. Go here if you enjoy beautiful woman f**king and sucking.
---I'd rather be anywhere but here, but I’m here and not anywhere---
The opinion that "Evil Angel = the best there is", is actually a fact that has been repeated over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again!
They consistently get high marks for their DVDs.
---I'd rather be anywhere but here, but I’m here and not anywhere---
[Link]
caneboy Deactivated User
New York City 115 Posts 1/02
Posted - Feb 5 2002 : 7:18PM
Wally, The purpose of a review is to give an opinion. Money might not be an object to you so you can afford to buy or rent every piece of porn thats released and decide for yourself if you like it. Time might not be an object to you so you can sit around and wack off watching porn all day. I value both very much. I don't like to waste my time or my money. Therefore, I read reviews. I read the reviews in the paper before I waste 20 bucks and a Friday night going to the movies. I read reviews on hiphop albums before I waste 15 bucks on a CD. And I definetely read reviews on restaurants before taking a date out to eat. I respect other peoples opinions and if a couple of knowledgeable people say something is trash or something is classic, that definetely factors into my buying decision.
I've been watching porn for 10 years but I've just gotten into buying it and being a real fan. I'll be the first to admit that you guys are more knowledgable then me. I'm happy to stick around here and learn a thing a two from you guys. And maybe even add something of value. Thats it, I gotta go.
I respect other peoples opinions and if a couple of knowledgeable people say something is trash or something is classic, that definetely factors into my buying decision.
well, I would not consider myself that knowledgable, I know a few things. I take time to type these reviews up. Sure I could say that a DVD is the best ever. But what about the next DVD I say is the best ever. Then once again, if I say that another DVD is the best there ever is. How can you trust my opinion if I keep saying that a DVD is the best there ever is.
I could just say get this DVD, you will love it, you can trust my opinion. Then when you shell out $20 and find it is pure crap, you will be even more pissed.
So I lay down the actions in the scenes, tell who gets what and by whom, and I'll say this one more time: I LET YOU DECIDE, BASED ON THE SCENE DESCRIPTION, IF YOU WILL REALLY WANT TO SEE THE DVD. That is why I prefer to review DVDs that have no been reviewed.
---I'd rather be anywhere but here, but I’m here and not anywhere---
OK BigMike - first off I greatly appreciate the time you take to write reviews. Just b/c I voice a somewhat negative opinion about your style doesn't mean that I'm not gonna read your reviews. I think you over-reacted a little, saying f**k off and talking about hate, etc. These are just porn reviews for christ's sake...the big problem I have with your argument and defense of your style is that porn is 100% visual. Just b/c you are giving us a blow by boring blow account of what is being done by whom doesn't mean that we have any real idea of what it looks like, the energy level, etc. So without any opinion in there you are not really letting us decide, you're just giving us a summary of what may or may not be "good". I fully understand that every review is subjective, but to just say "I'm gonna give you the facts and you decide" doesn't hold up with a porn review. A simple position like doggie anal or whatever has such a huge range of possibilities in terms of how it comes off on-screen. Ultimately you're saying that you don't want to committ b/c someone somewhere might disagree. To me that's just weak...I do agree with your comments about saying that a DVD is the greatest repeatedly and destroying your own credibility - that is exactly what's happening with people who give everything they see a 4.5 or 5. Or saying that they will be giving something a 5 before they even view it.
ok, before this thread turns into my reviewing style, I want to remind you all that you can post all criticims or complaints in: BIGmike's Reviews
so post your comments inthere about my reviews, instead of taking up space here for a DVD I have yet to see.
I'll listen to what the people want, the next three to four DVDs I review will have less play-by-play and more opinion. Hope it works for you all. Let me know if my reviews are good or if they need some work. Afterall, I just got into porn, seriously, at least, so I'm not as knowledgeable as some other reviewers. I comment on what I know or I will comment on what I know.
I'm not sensitive, I deal with criticism very well, but in order for me to improve you've got to let me know how.
Like I said before, I am by no means an expert, porn is a hobby for me, both viewing and reviewing. I'm not a professional writer, I do my best.
I would also like to apoligize for making this post so long winded, but I want to serve you, the buyers, as I am, so let me know!?!
---I'd rather be anywhere but here, but I’m here and not anywhere---