I just watch Julia Bond in the new flix, "Plump Round Rumps", and right into her scene, you notice almost all of her back is inked up. That kinda turned me off. She's pretty cute without the huge tatoo on her back. It was enough with just the tramp stamp, why inked up the whole back. It's just not the same Julia Bond I enjoyed watching.
I haven't seen her latest tat that covers her back. While I'm not a big fan of big tatoos I usually get used to seeing them on girl and don't mind them after awhile. Just like Janine's tatooed arm. At first it was distracting but now I'm so used to it it doesn't matter to me. I'm such a fan of Julia and Janine and like their looks and bodies I think it would be silly of me to put so much focus on something like a tatoo(s) to the point it turns me off to either of them.
I don't trust men who don't like big tits. 1067 Posts 12/04
Posted - Sep 17 2007 : 10:55AM
I'm still wishing death on the person who did those paw prints on her tits. Takes away from me enjoying her. Tit tats, too many tats and HUGE tats turn me off. Only a supernova hot chick can get away with it, like Sophia Santi. Julia Bond is not that hot IMO.
she's hot, but she might want to ease up on the carbs. genetically gifted though she may be, a smallish girl like that needs to be careful. IMHO at the time of her shooting her anal scene with Jules, she appeared to be getting very close to her critical mass. surely that's still a body to die for, but not quite the mindboggling mix of ripe, pliant, smooth, firm, full roundness we've seen in the past. that glorious butt and her fantastic thighs were definitely not defying gravity in the same deliciously stupefying way. I'd also like to see her quit messing with highlights; she's killer all-brunette.
she was one of the hottest brunettes in porn.....and I loved the Angel wings tatts... BUT...in Ashlynn And Friends 2....she;s a blond.....and looks...just....no..