Reviewers Recommend
Working Girls 3 (Reality Junkies)Working Girls 3 (Reality Junkies) - review by Captain Jack
Director: Mike Quasar
Starring: Danny Mountain, Derrick Pierce, Anissa Kate, Codey Steele, Adira Allure, Elizabeth Skylar, Taylor Wild, Jay Romero. Read review
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 175 > Just How Bad is Piracy Hurtig the Industry?
AuthorPost
concave
Member

56 Posts
7/14
Posted - Jul 12 2016 : 8:46PM
And what can be done about it?
metroxxx
Member

21 Posts
6/16
Posted - Jul 13 2016 : 2:56PM
It's still pretty bad, but I think a lot of the damage has already been done regarding the perceived value of content creation. Sales are at a record low across the board, some of which is due I'm sure to changes in how consumers wish to enjoy content which leads to the decline in physical media sales (DVDs, magazines, etc.), but a lot of consumers see porn as being "free" since tube sites give so much of it away.
I'm new here at Metro, but from what I've seen a good amount of our content has been pirated and used for tube & torrent food. We're working to combat that, but it's a cat & mouse game and almost impossible to recoup damages from these companies.
Ultimately it will come down to companies fine tuning products to be hyper-focused on niches that consumers want, and consumers to find it within themselves to pay for that level of quality and specificity.
Metro Makes Great Movies.
Canadian_Cindy
Deactivated User

1102 Posts
2/15
Posted - Jul 13 2016 : 3:20PM
The tube sites are are far worse problem than torrents.....
Saddest part is they are all owned by actual porn companies . Everyone is trying to kill their own industry at times.
Edited by - Canadian_Cindy on 7/13/2016 3:21:04 PM
shark1
Senior Member

1219 Posts
5/04
Posted - Jul 13 2016 : 6:45PM
A lot of people don't care at all about quality so tube sites are fine. I would never, ever watch porn I like on a tube site. I want the highest resolution possible.
Canadian_Cindy
Deactivated User

1102 Posts
2/15
Posted - Jul 13 2016 : 7:29PM
^yeah the quality is dreadful. It is utter garbage when you get down to it. I can't stand it and even if I didn't have a "pay for porn" mentality, I still would not like tube sites.
Edited by - Canadian_Cindy on 7/13/2016 7:29:39 PM
 
rhodium
Member

A cracked polystyrene man
183 Posts
6/11
Posted - Jul 13 2016 : 9:31PM
As to the 'what can be done about it?' question, I believe that lack of adaptation on the part of producers has contributed to the industry slide. Those who are pushing back against the tide, hoping for what used to be, are doomed to fail.
There are success stories out there even in the current climate. While I don't particularly care for their content, LegalPorno (through their parnership with PornBox) has set a new standard for content access and revenue in the last few years. Instead of paying a flat fee for a companies entire back catalog, members pay the same nominal fee for a handful of scenes of their choosing. This content is assigned value based on the inherent production cost (or time on the shelf), so their producers know instantaneously what is profitable and what is not. Their success is obvious based on their output: multiple 'expensive' scenes (gangbangs, DAPs) every week.
The key to the system though is that it's better than pirated content. To thieves, the options are crappy streams or large timely downloads. People are even willing to pay membership fees to file hosts for faster speeds, so the money is out there. But assuming that people (thieves or honest) download files for quality and to insure against their future lack of availability, this requires them to maintain large amounts of disk space which gets costly in itself. With PornBox, everything purchased is right there and streamable at high quality direct - forever. Download is still a choice, but the point is that it's not necessary.
There's obviously a euro variable in there that may have an effect, but since no US companies have adopted a similar strategy, the degree can't be known.
Anyway - no I don't pirate content, but I understand it, and the market being what it is, it's definitely a lot harder to find anything I like. I'm willing to spend my cash when I find it, but more often than not I'm headed back to the library instead of shelling out any new dollars.
Producers need to wake up and take control. Plenty of money still to be made.
Adapt or die.
killbillvol69 All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

^Lucy Pinder
18634 Posts
4/08
Posted - Jul 14 2016 : 1:29AM
^ The larger variable you're fogetting there with LP's business model is that they own the world's biggest tube site (basically the only big one that isn't owned by MindGeek) so they could quit shooting porn today, and they'd still bring in more money than they could ever spend.
They have no worry about if a particular (perhaps expensive) scene doesn't make enough money. They can churn out whatever they want and if it makes money, obviously that's great for them, but if it doesn't, they're not sleeping on a park bench next week because they can't make rent.
Porn producers who only produce porn don't have that luxury. If they spend a bunch of money on a scene and it doesn't sell, then they're fucked. They won't have money to spend on another scene, and that means they're out of business. There's not a lot of wiggle room when the industry is selling so few scenes/films. That's why a lot of companies aren't willing to take a chance on a scene that costs the kind of money that those LP scenes cost.
Dragon Sign
Deactivated User

3381 Posts
12/13
Posted - Jul 14 2016 : 4:46AM
There's less economic strength/space to do quality/artistic artful stuff with upmost care on DVD, if ya haven't got that picture, it's about fucking time.
rhodium
Member

A cracked polystyrene man
183 Posts
6/11
Posted - Jul 14 2016 : 8:23PM
I wasn't aware of their extracurricular interests but I respectfully disagree with the heaping bags of money you're ascribing to it. If they're only bringing in advertising dollars, there are plenty of mainstream outlets barely making ends meet with this model as well.
Tube sites aside, I still believe they have a stronger business model on its own. What you've described sounds more like industry excuse-making and finger-pointing. Self-pity and wailing at the new landscape isn't going to make any money. DVD sales and unlimited membership options aren't either.
Capitalism is based on the best ideas winning, and no one needs to sleep on a park bench if they've got one. Bring a better business plan, attract investment, take a shot.
LPee23 All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off.
248 Posts
1/15
Posted - Jul 14 2016 : 9:33PM
LegalPorno's stuff doesn't get pirated that often because they use invisible watermarks to identify downloaders. Each file contains a watermark, imperceptible to the eye, and unreadable unless you have the original image. The watermarks can be matched by LegalPorno to each of their customers. Customers know this, so few are willing to take the risk of sharing their content.
A few other companies have taken this approach too, for example, needapee.com. Their watermarks are hard to miss, they consist of nearly invisible but slightly opaque alphanumeric string right in the middle of the image. One guy posted once how he pirated some of their videos, and later he received a cease and desist letter from the company's attorney mailed right to his home address. You can bet he didn't pirate any more scenes.
This approach actually seems to work. LegalPorno does it in a way that is not obnoxious. If all sites did this, it would seriously stem the tide of new pirated content, and I wouldn't mind the identifiers being out there. If this were adopted across the board, it could significantly boost profits, and go a long way towards turning the industry around back towards the boom years.
killbillvol69 All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

^Lucy Pinder
18634 Posts
4/08
Posted - Jul 15 2016 : 12:17AM
The point is that you can only develop a "better business plan" (in this case, making scenes that no one else can afford to make) if you have money to fall back on. And the only reason they had money to fall back on is they were pirating everyone else's scenes and putting them on their tube site.
It may be excuses or finger-pointing, but that doesn't mean it's not true and valid.
What's the difference between LP and others? They were willing to break the law, and fuck over everyone else, until they had enough money to launch their "better business plan".
Mass Facialties
Deactivated User

"Facialized Vol. 7" 2021 AVN Awards Winner: Best Oral Movie
9308 Posts
9/13
Posted - Jul 19 2016 : 3:16AM
When it comes to content being pirated, what's the more common source-physical DVDs or downloaded scenes/movies from membership sites?
metroxxx
Member

21 Posts
6/16
Posted - Jul 19 2016 : 4:06AM
We've actually experienced piracy from both sides of the aisle. For quite some time, Metro content was only available on DVD or select VOD outlets. Now with our new membership sites, we're seeing more scenes being pirated and uploaded to streaming sites & torrents.
+ Metro Makes Great Movies. +
shalalin
Senior Member

1736 Posts
11/07
Posted - Jul 19 2016 : 5:40AM
That seems to be an urban legend to me. (The " not pirated much" part, anyway - I have no idea if they actually use any such anti-piracy techniques.) As far as I can tell their stuff is all over the usual places, just like everybody else's.
Edit: I should perhaps add that by "the usual places" I mean those that make full files available for download, not shitty tube sites.
Edited by - shalalin on 7/19/2016 5:45:55 AM
Real
Deactivated User

300 Posts
1/16
Posted - Jul 19 2016 : 10:02AM
Wait if those invisible watermarks are useful in combating piracy, then why don't all the other companies use them?
If it helps to identify the original crime and the account that belongs to it then that could help a lot in pursuing a legal action.
 
RedDevil87
Senior Member

1044 Posts
4/11
Posted - Jul 19 2016 : 4:35PM
Nominal fee? You pay the same for a few scenes as you would for several hundred elsewhere. It costs a fortune which is why I don't bother with it.
lex von v
Senior Member

2511 Posts
12/12
Posted - Jul 19 2016 : 5:29PM
They are not used by others because of two things:
a) to my knowledge, the video at LP is prepared on a per-user-bases, which takes some additional server load, as individual files have to be prepared for the user (or they have to be created on-the-fly while downloading). That is some non-standard delivery software that also has to be maintained.
b) (and that is probably the main reason): at the software company I;m working, the most pirated versions out there are purchased with stolen credit card numbers. The software gets delivered on-line, and days later the credit card processor revokes the payment. All you have is an email address and a fake physical address, and that license now is put up at all the usual places hours later. Who do you sue?
I reckon it;s the same with the porn sites: if they are known to have watermarks/user tracking, some fake credentials are used.



Jump To: