just watched where the boys arent 17 it's terrible

You are not logged in
Log in | Register to Post

New Pornstar Interviews - [more]

Introducing Dallas Rea

"I’m very submissive so I love being bossed around and told what to do."

Participate...

log in
register

Browse...

Etiquette
Active Topics
Popular Topics
Member List
Search

All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 585 > just watched where the boys arent 17 it's terrible

Author	Post
babby Senior Member 1283 Posts 2/04	Posted - Feb 10 2006 : 9:58PM It's the worst i have ever seen. what has vivid done to destroy this once great girl girl series. if you have not seen this movie dont wast your money. it's bad folks. compare this to NO man.s land 15 from video team, and it's not even close. they may as well end this series now. [Link]
MASAMUNE Senior Member 1452 Posts 12/04	Posted - Feb 10 2006 : 10:24PM this guy really liked it i have this one coming in the mail already so ill check it out for myself. it seems to have a lot going for it though: -intriguing concept -no toys except in last scene -video, not film transfer mod note: fixed link to correct page format Edited by - hardware on 2/14/2006 1:42:35 PM [Link]
babby Senior Member 1283 Posts 2/04	Posted - Feb 10 2006 : 11:37PM to each it's own. if the guy liked it fine. but i for one thought it was pitiful. they have destroyed that series. [Link]
vodka tonic coolest cucumber who 1243 Posts 11/02	Posted - Feb 11 2006 : 5:06AM That would be cool if you could submit a review explaining why you didn't like it. Negative reviews are just as (if not more) useful to consumers than positive reviews. I remember Chloe Jones was so misused in the previous chapter. Did she suffer the same treatment here ? [Link]
Walter All-Star Member 1445 Posts 3/05	Posted - Feb 12 2006 : 12:27AM I just got Where The Boys Aren't 7 on DVD. The original version (on VHS) was one of the first porn movies I saw. The DVD has an annoying watermark (lower left hand corner of the screen)and camera icon (upper right hand corner of the screen) that pops up for several minutes in each scene. This is totally lame and unacceptable in my opinion! They butchered a good movie when they put it on DVD. Shame on them! [Link]

CodeMonkey Member 363 Posts 2/05	Posted - Feb 14 2006 : 6:59AM Well, I found this girl-girl flick to be a nice change of pace from the usual girl-girl gonzo I watch. The performers were all glammed up which I usually don't like but since it was more retro I kind of was turned on by it. There were plenty of good close-ups and some ass licking which is a favorite fetish of mine. There weren't too many toys -- mostly fingers and tongues which was also refreshing. Since this is a studio feature most of the women had implants which is usually a turn-off for me but I was able to look past it since most of them also had pretty faces and seemed to really get into the scenes. I guess I was in the mood to see it and I definitely enjoyed it. Sorry you didn't, babby. [Link]
TheLoneGunman Member 400 Posts 10/03	Posted - Feb 14 2006 : 10:49AM Walter wrote: I just got Where The Boys Aren't 7 on DVD. The original version (on VHS) was one of the first porn movies I saw. The DVD has an annoying watermark (lower left hand corner of the screen)and camera icon (upper right hand corner of the screen) that pops up for several minutes in each scene. This is totally lame and unacceptable in my opinion! They butchered a good movie when they put it on DVD. Shame on them! Click to expand Walter, the camera icon is Vivid's multiple angle indicator. If you don't like it, you CAN turn it off (go to the menu's multiple angle/set-up section). As for the original poster...smells like a troll to me! Edited by - TheLoneGunman on 2/14/2006 10:51:21 AM [Link]
mrdngm Member 754 Posts 11/04	Posted - Feb 15 2006 : 4:53AM TheLoneGunman wrote: . . . . As for the original poster...smells like a troll to me! Click to expand That's not my impression. Maybe he's just upset like alot of old fans of this series are. He's posted about this before and posts regularly on g/g related stuff. [Link]
myadultgroups Deactivated User Los Angeles 755 Posts 10/04	Posted - Feb 15 2006 : 7:02PM It was shot on video? It must look cheesy then. Who's in it? [Link]
M.B. Senior Member 1679 Posts 2/01	Posted - Feb 15 2006 : 9:58PM This movie sucks. The biggest reason for this is the simple fact that the girls don't know how to eat pussy (except for Jenna). None of these girls have a fucking clue on how to please another woman with their tongue and it shows. All the toys in the world can't hide that fact that they don't like or know how to eat pussy. This is why most lesbian movies made by big porn companies suck -The girls aren't really into it so they do it half assed and try and hide it with the major use of toys. [Link]
mrdngm Member 754 Posts 11/04	Posted - Feb 16 2006 : 11:27PM You'd be surprised what good direction can do -- lots of straight porn chicks do great g/g scenes with the right guidance (for example, Tiffany Mynx). The women in the cast of WTBA 17 are pros who are more than capable of scorching g/g under the right circumstances. I would not blame them first. In this case, I'd look harder at who's producing/directing/camera, etc. Edited by - mrdngm on 2/21/2006 9:17:58 AM [Link]

All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 585just watched where the boys arent 17 it's terrible

Previous topic: blow me sandwich 8??
Next topic: can anyone recommend a widescreen dorcel film?