Kim Kardashian

Author	Post
wusshater spunkdthemovie.com I'd rather go to work and be abused by others than stay at home and abuse myself 197 Posts 10/06	Posted - Apr 1 2007 : 2:35PM Is it me or is this video a piece of crap? It seems like they took about 3 minutes of footage and somehow extended it into a full-length movie! Between the looping of the same footage over and over, the use of reverse negative shots to make it look like different footage, I feel like Vivid is not giving the viewer any credit at all. Do they really think that this can fool us? I mean, they used the same sound bit of Kim saying "Baby" to Ray J about 20 times. [Link]
Hairy Potter Member KLDC 72 Posts 4/07	Posted - Apr 1 2007 : 3:50PM A loop is a repetition of the same scene over and over again. I'm not a fan of this either. It seems wrong and a way to for them to get more bang for their buck, while I get less bang for mine. That is all. [Link]
Derek117 Senior Member 1605 Posts 1/06	Posted - Apr 1 2007 : 5:40PM I agree. Better customer service by Vivid would have been to just offer this on their website as a 10-minute short...not to charge $39/per copy for an inflated DVD. But, they shelled out $1 million, and have to make it back somehow. Oh, since this topic seems to be pretty "open" about Kim, I may as well go on record as being the only man in America who does NOT think Kim Kardashian is hot. She's no Jessica Alba, Eva Mendez or JLo...or, even a Jennifer Love Hewitt. Now, those are celebs I'd pay $39/per dvd to see fucking for just three minutes. Sorry, not my type. [Link]
biermacht Deactivated User 83 Posts 2/01	Posted - Apr 1 2007 : 6:15PM I thought it was overhyped and very disappointing. [Link]
IWAdult Member 628 Posts 5/06	Posted - Apr 1 2007 : 8:26PM Normally I enjoy Vivid films, but this is ridiculous. They should be ashamed of themselves for putting this out. They clearly had a plan with big marketing and “controversy” to hype it. And in the end it all equals a lot of sales for big money for the company. [Link]

Derek117 Senior Member 1605 Posts 1/06	Posted - Apr 1 2007 : 9:19PM IWAdult wrote: Normally I enjoy Vivid films, but this is ridiculous. They should be ashamed of themselves for putting this out. They clearly had a plan with big marketing and “controversy” to hype it. And in the end it all equals a lot of sales for big money for the company. Click to expand Yeah...maybe this dvd should be re-titled "Vivid Screws Everybody." After obtaining legal rights to a personal sex tape (from RayJ who owned the camera & videotape) Vivid screws Kim Kardashian by putting her private sex acts on the street--causing her public humiliation. Then by charging $39/per copy for a ten minute loop, Vivid screws anyone willing to fall for the hype and shell out the money. Gee, maybe this is what my friends mean when they say the porn business is "obscene." It's not the sex, it's the lack of ethics and morals. [Link]
Olander Member 166 Posts 1/05	Posted - Apr 1 2007 : 9:50PM Who is this person??? I've never heard of her. [Link]
rloyola0426 Member 110 Posts 9/04	Posted - Apr 1 2007 : 9:55PM google is your friend Although I agree, she is no celebrity. Ray J is probably considered a bigger celebrity, and even that is stretching it. In actuality, there were no celebrities in this celebrity sex tape. Go figure. So just like Olander said: Who is this person??? I've never heard of her. [Link]
realtip Deactivated User 2301 Posts 6/04	Posted - Apr 1 2007 : 10:55PM wusshater wrote: Is it me or is this video a piece of crap? Click to expand It's not just you. It really is a piece of crap. I just recently rented and watched the video, and was very disappointed. I have never watched a so-called "celebrity" sex tape before because I figured they were all probably lame, and I never watch anything by Vivid for the same reason. But I made an exception this time because I was just curious to see it. This video could have been much better than it is, but I blame Vivid Video for it being so jacked-up. I guess it was too much to expect for the studio to just release the video exactly as it was recorded without all the crappy editing, added background music, and annoying voice dubbing. This is exactly the kind of thing that Vivid would do to kill a potentially entertaining flick. Also, the highly-rumored and much-anticipated golden shower scene is not included on the DVD- no big surprise there, but still disappointing. Of all the studios to sell this video to, why Vivid? Derek117 wrote: After obtaining legal rights to a personal sex tape (from RayJ who owned the camera & videotape) Vivid screws Kim Kardashian by putting her private sex acts on the street--causing her public humiliation. Click to expand Word on the street is that she was actually involved in negotiating the sale of the video, so maybe it's not really all that humiliating for her. rloyola0426 wrote: In actuality, there were no celebrities in this celebrity sex tape. Click to expand Are there ever? [Link]
camaban Member Germany 437 Posts 8/03	Posted - Apr 2 2007 : 6:21AM I willl never understand why this porn company is still alive. Where are the Idiots who buy their shit? Is mankind so dumb? But maybe their films are good, if you have sleep problems, so that you didn't need any sleep pills. Edited by - camaban on 4/2/2007 6:22:20 AM [Link]
Derek117 Senior Member 1605 Posts 1/06	Posted - Apr 2 2007 : 9:19AM realtip wrote: Word on the street is that she was actually involved in negotiating the sale of the video, so maybe it's not really all that humiliating for her. Click to expand That's just Vivid "spinning" the story to try to make them not come off sleazy because they're releasing private sex that the girl doesn't want released. My understanding is they offered her some money (in return for her consent), but she said "no." Since they had a signed document from RayJ (who owns the camera & videotape) they could legally release the tape. It's scumming and an example of the low ethics and morals practiced in the porn industry nowadays. In the eyes of Vivid I guess Kim Kardashian's First Amendment rights don't count! [Link]
Olander Member 166 Posts 1/05	Posted - Apr 2 2007 : 9:38AM rloyola0426 wrote: google is your friend Although I agree, she is no celebrity. Ray J is probably considered a bigger celebrity, and even that is stretching it. In actuality, there were no celebrities in this celebrity sex tape. Go figure. So just like Olander said: Who is this person??? I've never heard of her. Click to expand Good idea, I'll do a google search. I've never heard of Ray J either, by the way. [Link]
Cairo Member 23 Posts 4/07	Posted - Apr 2 2007 : 11:52AM C'mon fellas everybody who saw the video knew it was going to lame before even watching it but that's not the point. The point is the current wave of mass hysteria surrounding celebrity. If you didn't know Home made porn is pretty bad a the best of times why would celebrities be any more talented in pointing a camera than you or I? Furthermore the sex we have at home is totally different than the pornography we watch. I mean when was the last time you put your partner in anal full nelson or pile driver. Its funny cause I remember a conversation I had with my brother and he got the idea from a porno that while have sex in doggy while spreading one of her checks to side would improve the sensation. LMFAO! what an idiot! Anyways my point is this nobody wants to watch a porn made my jane nobody cause chances are it isn't going to be good, especially if there not experienced. However if jane krakowski puts out a sex video we suddenly the public can't wait to get their paws on it expecting that she should be fucking like a porn star. From another prospective i never even heard of Kim Kardashian before this little incident so if the goal of the video was to get her name out maybe it has worked or maybe Raj jay releasing a new album, interest marketing tool [Link]
Ramsey Senior Member Trina Michaels fan 10332 Posts 10/02	Posted - Apr 2 2007 : 12:19PM I feel like Vivid is not giving the viewer any credit at all. Click to expand Do they ever? [Link]
wusshater spunkdthemovie.com I'd rather go to work and be abused by others than stay at home and abuse myself 197 Posts 10/06	Posted - Apr 3 2007 : 12:48PM I also love how the big "cumshot" wasn't even a cumshot at all. I couldn't see a single drop! [Link]

DtotheJ Member 190 Posts 8/06	Posted - Apr 3 2007 : 12:53PM you think ray will suffer some backlash for this? [Link]
Pornmaster Mike Senior Member 32DDD 1462 Posts 8/02	Posted - Apr 3 2007 : 4:12PM kim was hot but the tape sucked - although i will say it was nice watching her suck a big black cock! lol its obvious that kim was in on the deal (model release anyone??) - its just clever marketing... but c'mon - do you really believe in their most intimate of moments kim says "oh ray J! fuck me ray J!" - Mike Edited by - Pornmaster Mike on 4/3/2007 4:14:40 PM [Link]
sally Deactivated User 45 Posts 2/07	Posted - Apr 3 2007 : 8:12PM wusshater wrote: I also love how the big "cumshot" wasn't even a cumshot at all. I couldn't see a single drop! Click to expand I have never seen a black guy cum. [Link]
Tinaka Member 953 Posts 8/03	Posted - Apr 3 2007 : 9:40PM Piece of crap video. Piece of crap company. They like to make out like they're this high and mighty studio who can take porn into the mainstream. But they're not and cannot. Everything they put out just stinks. The picture quality, the menus, the "bonuses", the chaptering, the decade old phone sex ads, the misleading compilations even the Vivid girls are mostly skanks who aren't fit to wipe the ass of an average free-lance girl. Vivid = RIP-OFF. [Link]
BigBoy Senior Member 3359 Posts 1/03	Posted - Apr 4 2007 : 2:44AM Somebody said - In the eyes of Vivid I guess Kim Kardashian's First Amendment rights don't count! That's right as soon as you find yourself screwing or whatever on video tape, First Amendment is out the window. If you think otherwise YOU are naive. [Link]
Tinaka Member 953 Posts 8/03	Posted - Apr 4 2007 : 12:30PM Of course she was in on it. [Link]
Kimball Deactivated User 65 Posts 2/07	Posted - Apr 4 2007 : 12:47PM Didn't see this DVD, but I was under the impression that there was a golden shower included. Is this true? [Link]
Tinaka Member 953 Posts 8/03	Posted - Apr 4 2007 : 1:52PM Kimball wrote: Didn't see this DVD, but I was under the impression that there was a golden shower included. Is this true? Click to expand Not true [Link]
LeeScott Member Glasgow, Scotland 77 Posts 5/06	Posted - Apr 4 2007 : 3:03PM At least with One Night In Paris you actually got to see someone you might call "famous". And if I am honest, th oral sex scene is pretty hot... The Vivid feature sunds much worse, and $39 for a dvd by American price standards is way off the mark for what it is worth!! Regards, Lee [Link]
wusshater spunkdthemovie.com I'd rather go to work and be abused by others than stay at home and abuse myself 197 Posts 10/06	Posted - Apr 4 2007 : 4:14PM LeeScott wrote: At least with One Night In Paris you actually got to see someone you might call "famous". Click to expand Actually, Paris Hilton wasn't really famous when 1 Night in Paris came out. Her fame was on par with a C-List celebrity at that time. In fact, the porn is pretty much what MADE her famous (the porn tape came out, then she was on The Simple Life, and her name started to get huge). I think Vivid was hoping the same thing would happen with the Kim Kardashian sex tape; that it would make her famous and make her a big name, and thus they would get more and more sales of her sex tape, just like Red Light did with the Paris Tape. But, in the Kim Kardashian case, I just don't think that will happen... [Link]

realtip Deactivated User 2301 Posts 6/04	Posted - Apr 4 2007 : 11:00PM Kimball wrote: Didn't see this DVD, but I was under the impression that there was a golden shower included. Is this true? Click to expand Rumor has it that there was a golden shower in the original video recording, but that it was deleted from the DVD release by Vivid. [Link]
DtotheJ Member 190 Posts 8/06	Posted - Apr 5 2007 : 10:07AM wusshater wrote: LeeScott wrote: At least with One Night In Paris you actually got to see someone you might call "famous". Click to expand Actually, Paris Hilton wasn't really famous when 1 Night in Paris came out. Her fame was on par with a C-List celebrity at that time. In fact, the porn is pretty much what MADE her famous (the porn tape came out, then she was on The Simple Life, and her name started to get huge). I think Vivid was hoping the same thing would happen with the Kim Kardashian sex tape; that it would make her famous and make her a big name, and thus they would get more and more sales of her sex tape, just like Red Light did with the Paris Tape. But, in the Kim Kardashian case, I just don't think that will happen... Click to expand The fox series..Simple Life was already shot.....the news of the tape "leaked..he he he" a few days before the show aired........but it came to the market months after the Simple Life was already on the air..... [Link]
eduardo911 Senior Member 1299 Posts 8/03	Posted - Apr 6 2007 : 3:36AM At some point Kim says: "Hi everybody" as if she's aware others than her BF are going to be watching it. [Link]