IIRC, Lethal Hardcore is Stoney Curtis. Stoney Curtis is notorious for not sending screeners to anybody unless they consistently praise him for everything he does giving him sky high ratings. If you give him a bad review or two he cuts you off immediately. So if you do find somewhere that has a ton of positive reviews of his movies you might want to take them with a grain of salt...
"Vegetarianism for me is about saying ‘yes’ to things - even meat." - Coupling
You know those polls asking what 10 DVD's you'd take to a desert island with you? Well, I can't think of a single LH title that I'd pick. So far, everything I've watched has been average. Usually not terrible; never great, just OK. YMMV.
PS - Just watched one the other day with Haley Paige in it. It's the first time I realized Haley has red skin.
Go to AVN.com, click on "reviews" on the upper left side of the home page, wait a few seconds til the search engine comes up, then enter Lethal Hardcore in the company name category and you'll get a boatload.
God hates us all, you know it's true, God hates this place. - Slayer 1726 Posts 10/03
Posted - Jul 29 2005 : 3:11PM
Ya but come on... the AVN reviews a re rather short, not really informative and some times not correct. Den, from CAVR.com, pointed it out the other day, an AVN.com review said Ashley Blue was busty.....
Well, gee willikers, we made a factual mistake. Listen, if I had a dollar for every factual mistake I read in other publications/websites' reviews, I would have retired a long time ago. AVN's not perfect and neither is any other adult reviewer. The vast majority of our hundreds of reviews per issue are accurate, informative and to the point. Who needs to read, as I've spotted on other sites, 400 word paragraphs describing a single sex scene? Personally, I find such reviews ridiculously over-written and fat. Sometimes, less is more. But each to their own.
btw - and this irony is too delicious - he who throws stones about porn stars chests shouldn't live in glass houses. I just checked out your site and in your home page profile of "featured star" Gia Paloma, you state that she's "natural." Wrong. As of about six weeks ago, she has a bitchin' big pair of bolt-ons.
Has Extreme released anything yet featuring Gia and her bolt-on's? I haven't seen anything yet, but that doesn't mean that they haven't.
However, if they haven't, my opinion is that the "Featured Info" page is still correct. When you consider that the point of that site is to inform people about adult movies, anyone who reads that site today and goes out looking for a movie featuring Gia Paloma will find that they are getting a movie featuring a girl with a natural c-cup, just like the site says.
The day that Extreme releases the first DVD featuring Gia's new boobs, then, if they haven't changed the site, WCAReviews will be wrong.
On the other hand, if anything that Gia shot after the new boobjob is currently on the market, then I take back everything that I wrote.
To add to what Bill said, there's also some extremely well done sets of bolt-ons out there. I haven't checked out the profile, but if PL has something like a "last updated" date on the page, then from what I see he's still being factual to the best of his abilities. There's a big difference between that and a busty Ashley Blue...
"Vegetarianism for me is about saying ‘yes’ to things - even meat." - Coupling
God hates us all, you know it's true, God hates this place. - Slayer 1726 Posts 10/03
Posted - Jul 30 2005 : 1:11AM
Mike, I have no axe to grind with you or AVN - I didn't even know you were with them. It's no big deal, I apologize if I offended you with my views, they just aren't my cup of tea. Maybe I should have said that instead, God knows I have been wrong on reviews and you are human. Although I still don't think the reviews are as informative as the could be - granted mine do probably go over the line in that respect, but that's my down fall.
With that said, my site is mostly centered around what I see. Unfortunately I don't have the want or will to keep up with every last change a girl has made on her body. All I can say is if I see Gia with new boobs, my database will reflect it. However since it is something that should be noted - I will take the time to add those notes to my database, reflecting you said she has new boobs.
Astro if you do check out my site, you can sort the reviews by date - that date is the last time I seen her, but even at that it don't make the stats right. This is a good example. The flick I last scene her in was produced in 2004. So I think that kind of serves as a "last updated". Would you agree?
I did add a "Last review added on" to the left navigation bar if that helps clarify...
Hi Kamp I actually just watched that movie today. I rented it for Sammie Rhodes and BrookeLynn and they had the best scenes in it. Brooklynne is with some other chick and her tits look good, and Sammie takes it from Talon. A solid scene. The rest of the movie was average. U had Nadia Nyce and Trina Michaels going through just another day at work. Though Trina in pigtails was not bad. Then Kelli Tyler with 2 guys. Lethal Hardcore's movies are all the same basically. I have seen like 10 of them and they all take place in the same house, with the same lighting, and basically the same guys. But they can be pretty decent, at least you know what u are getting with them.
PL, apology accepted. Btw, I'm curious as to what AVN review contained the Ashley Blue error. If you know, shoot me an e-mail with the title of the production at ramone@avn.com so I can correct it.
As for Bll and Astroknight's rationalizing defenses of you stating that Gia Paloma is "natural," well, nice try fellas, but no cigar. She's no longer natural. To say otherwise is simply inaccurate.
I disagree. The "bio" is about Gia in the movies that she is in. If a performer retires and subsequently has a boob job (for feature dancing, for example), in a site dedicated to reviewing adult movies, I would expect a description of that performer to say that she has natural breasts. That way, if I decide to rent or buy a movie featuring that performer, I won't be surprised. The "bio" on a site such as wcareviews is based on what she has done on video, not what she has done in her private life. Otherwise, you could make the argument that using the name "Gia Paloma" in the bip is incorrect because it is not her real name.
On the other hand, once a single movie has been released with that same preformer, I would want to see both a before and after description with an approximate date of the first movie released post-surgery. Once again, that's so I know what I'm getting when I go look for a movie with that performer.
The site doesn't contain her life story. It contains information that helps readers choose what tapes & DVD's they want to rent or buy. Including information about a performer, when that information is not accurate in any of the work that is available to date, is just superfluous.
Porno movies, sexy videos, xxx. Adult DVD Talk at your service. 6409 Posts 11/99
Posted - Aug 1 2005 : 6:41PM
We have recently started receiving Lethal Hardcore screeners that came from a pr firm. Unfortunately, they were shipped without a sleeve - hopefully they will play properly. I'm about to send some of these out tomorrow. Reviews coming soon.
Posted - Jul 26 2005 : 8:06PM