New Pornstar Interviews - [more]
Introducing Lady LorReign

"Good oral on me turns me on. Also, knowing that my partner is enjoying themself,"
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 695 > Madison, Paige, Mercedes vs Almost Ugly
AuthorPost
Jaggers
Member


140 Posts
9/03
Posted - Jun 16 2004 : 11:06AM
Very refreshing to see Madison, Paige/Pagie, Mercedes (No Cum Dodging Allowed), Sandy Style, Sarah Blue and hoardes of Euro-babes. There are too many ordinary girls being over-exposed in cheap set-ups, gang-banged in a filthy room, tons of tatoos, overweight, etc. How many times can you see so-and-so's ordinary ass with a dick in it with the same guys and read RAVE reviews on here because they happen to be in the stable of the most frequent posting community? After being in Europe and collecting ravishing babes in exotic scenes not allowed in the US, I wonder how long ordinary looking casts of girls expect to grace box covers....if you did not change the name of half the movies they would not differ at all with the exact same people in them. Thankfully there are some creative ones with lovely set-ups, lingerie, and good sexy talk, not a study in anatomy or gynecology. The hairy end of a gut or gaping ass on an overweight tattooed and screwed or garage gangbanged whorish broad just looks repulsive. I loved seeing Paige/Pagie in Breakin' Em In Six and LH releases, Madison in anything, and Sarah Blue in AE #3. If I had not bought Mercedes in No Cum Dodging #1 as my first DVD and saw her draw 3-4 Orgasms (a first)from each of the 3 or 4 guys who never seem to lose wood, I would not have made the mistake of buying 300 more DVD's before watching only a couple dozen with nice casts or good producers.

Hardware All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Your other left
14595 Posts
3/02
Posted - Jun 16 2004 : 12:04PM
I'm all for creativity, and I'm always hollering about production values, too. I'd just remind you that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and whether we're talking about Madison, Paige and Mercedes, or India, Ava Vincent and Claudia Jamsson; whether it's no-hands blow jobs, kissing or gaping, everybody would like to see more of their favorite stars and fetishes. If it keeps being put out there it's because somebody's making money on it.
*Mutt*
Deactivated User

752 Posts
8/03
Posted - Jun 16 2004 : 1:10PM

hmmm......i don't know what movies you're watching but it seems to me that the good studios shoot mostly pretty hot girls, i don't see many dogs, maybe one or two per video aren't exactly Tera Patrick or Teagan but porn was always that way, a couple standouts per movie and the rest average.

Jaggers
Member

140 Posts
9/03
Posted - Jun 17 2004 : 1:29AM
Well, IMHO That is simply not true. There are studios and directors putting together very nice looking casts of well-rested girls, dressed provactively, etc. An average-looking stable of over-used girls, or even beautiful girls shot with lousy set-ups, tattoos, dirty hair, and appearing in 5 releases with the same guys every week makes everything start looking the same. I spend less than 10 min scanning such a 'masterpiece' and rely on reviews from reviewers who have been around the block if I am not familiar with the studio, cast, and director's work.




Jump To: