IAFD, supporters of beastiality. Just say no. 7564 Posts 11/02
Posted - Apr 18 2004 : 11:03AM
Name •: Erik Everhard Aliases •: / Years Active •: 1998-2004 Date of Birth •: ??/??/19?? Place of Birth •: ??, Canada Movies •: 21:Fresh Meat #7: Take This Ass , Please 3 , Please 4: It’s a Dog’s Life , The Voyeur #14 , Please 5: Fireworks, Sex World A to Z , Faith Betrayed , Fashion Sluts 12: Intercontinental Girls Next Door (They're Everywhere) , California Calendar Girls , Slutwoman 2 , Please 11: Sexual Superstars , Please 12: More Sexual Superstars , Action Sports Sex 10 , The Watcher 8: Operation Voyeurism , Buttman's Big Butt Backdoor Babes 2 , Buttwoman vs. Buttwoman , Fashion Sluts 14: The Lost Whores , Young and Tight , Sodomania Orgies #3: After School , Nice Rack #4: 100% Natural , Initiations #5 and Un-Natural Sex #3 Comments : Just like last week, I don't think any comment is necessary here. I believe that every ADTer not only knows Erik Everhard, but even has his/her very own, often quite outspoken, opinion of him. Is he too loud in his scenes? To be honest, I hadn't noticed this at all, so I guess this doesn't bother me much. What I did notice, however, is his high energy style of performance. I recently had the pleasure of watching Sportfucking 1 and I noticed that Erik doesn't confuse high energy with passionate fucking. He does both. I like that. Some of the girls Erik is working with like it too. In fact, that is why I like it. What I don't like or understand, is his nickname of "The Hate Plow". What is that all about? What does "Hate" have to do with good porn? Picture : Erik Everhard IAFD Page : Erik Everhard on the IAFD Website : /
Disclaimer: All the information in the fields marked with an "•" represent only data found in Walter Burns' personal database, nothing more, nothing less.
Sir Noel Plum said: "The deluge of mediocrity can win out simply because it is a deluge."
Silly, Walter! Trix are for kids ... oh, uh, grooming comes under the heading of care. And, in my harem, sex is 24/7 -- just not always the same participants. That's the whole point of having a harem: continuity with variety! ~ GS
I know I'm supposed to consult with BIGmike when it comes time to "dress up" but I'm not really sure about changing diapers -- I've always let Uncle Sam handle training in the past: his little toy soldiers follow orders so well!. And my experience with my international harem members is that they are sophisticated enough to need very little further training.
Having never been into children, especially young ones, I just don't see diapers as an issue. I've always liked my boys all grown up!
Walter, you must be the first man here on ADT who has posted such sentiments. I knew I wasn't imagining it when I have said before, he's not that loud. I think people get confused by his high energy performances, and think they're hearing things.
He and Steve Holmes are the guys in my favorite scene ever, in Everhards's Sport Fucking 1. It's the first one with Tera Joy, and it's the only DP I've ever enjoyed watching (and watching...). Why? Because it's the only DP where I've seen the two men talking to the woman throughout the scene, instead of to each other. Plus, Tera is on fire, from the moment Steve touches her, to the final seconds when she winks at the camera with her black eyes. A masterpiece!
Yes, he's too friggin' loud. His "high energy style" also makes him a useless director as he selfishly indulges himself the way he wants and completely forgets about good positions or camera angles for his viewers. Who else would think that laying a girl on her side with her legs closed and in the way while he's busy plugging away is good porn?
But that's exactly what I look for in porn, a sense of realism and excitement. Always insisting on a good camera angle can inhibit the spontaneity of the moment.Hel-lo
Hey Dick Johnson, you don`t like Everhard, we get it, but this part: "His "high energy style" also makes him a useless director", this means that if you don`t like something is useless?, one thing is that you don`t like his style, but say that he is a useless director was too much i think, but anyway there are a lot of other performers/ directors that you can watch.
Here we go again....Mr. Johnson, you understandably have no idea how good it feels to be on the receiving end of such a position. It is divine, it is to die for! Did you ever think that Everhard does some of these moves because they are pleasurable for the woman? Or do you think that a women in a scene doesn't deserve even an ounce, a smidgen of pleasure?
Yeah, Everhard is high energy. But I'd much rather watch him than some of these guys who are on the silent side. There's one quiet guy out there - I'm sure he's a decent person - but he's got the screen presense of a turnip. I'd rather watch a rutabaga fuck.
Thank you for everyone's appreciation of my efforts over the last 6 years, i'm always striving to give the most that I can in my scenes. As i have stated many times before dick,if you don't want to watch me you don't have to. Last time i recall you were allowed to chose what you want to watch and what you don't in america, so you are free to exercise that right. No one holds a gun to your head and forces you to watch "Erik Everhard" movies, if you don't like them just buy other flicks. There is so much quality stuff out there it seems that your time would be better spent stroking off to material you liked than complaining about me, just my two cents. Erik Everhard
Speaking from more experience, this is one of my girlfriend's favorite positions. Whether it's more spoon or modified missionary. So it may not be "good porn" in your opinion, though I disagree, it's good sex. Seems the females will back that up.
Erik,
Keep up the good work. Can't wait for Ass Obsessed 2.
"Hey Gringo! Here comes El Zoido, to ruin your drinking water!!!" Listen to Racer X!
I want to add another positive about Erik - I've yet to hear him call a woman a slut, a whore or a bitch, even when he's in a scene where the other men are doing this. He's a classy guy when he's dealing with the ladies, unlike too many other porn guys out there who think it's their right and duty to spout out the obscenities at their female partners. Actors who do this crap go on my "Avoid at All Costs" list, and I make it a point to point this out in my DVD reviews.
I just watched two more scenes with Everhard, in a Vince Vouyer film. He was no louder than the other men, and you could clearly hear anything the women were saying.
You caught me. I should have written, that Everhard calls women names a lot less than other actors. Especially, when he's in scenes where the other guys are pontificating with the curse words (and sounding like idiots to me), he's less likely to spout out like this, even as vocal as he is.
I too have watched a few times as Erik thrashes out some pretty nasty talk to the ladies (his scene with Éva on Khan Tusion's website & a couple of Anabolic productions) but mainly he stays away from the verbal degradation. I've also noticed, as Renee said, that when other male performers really gang up on a lady verbally, he usually stays quiet in that area. I think what makes him such a cool performer is that he's all about the hard fucking. He doesn't waste time trying to implement a lot of useless baggage & concepts in his scenes. He is a natural fuck machine & isn't shy about it. When the camera angles are right, it's so much fun to watch him perform. I also enjoy seeing the females on the receiving end of the "hate plow". You can tell it's not an experience they're going to forget anytime soon! One of his best scenes of all time is with Shyla Styles in NAUGHTY COLLEGE SCHOOL GIRLS #24. The heat in that scene is electrifying! I think it won (or was nominated) for an AVN best sex scene award. Enjoy.
I will try to state my position and assumptions so that everyone understands where I'm coming from in the future :-)
Dumblonde: I guess you and I are on opposite ends of the spectrum when it comes to our porn preferences. You say you look for a sense of realism and excitement. I, on the other hand, have come to believe that good-quality porn (as opposed to sex) has to be cafefully guided and directed, with the viewer at home being the number-one priority, not the enjoyment of the performers who are already getting paid to do it. The trick, however, it's to make it look as realistic as possible after all the deliberate direction. I've watched some behind-the-scenes features where it was evident how the couple on-screen really weren't having sex but rather performing under continuous directions such as "move your head this way; bend over; etc.". IMHO, this is the way I expect good Gonzo to be. I expect the "realism-focused" movies to exist as a separate subgenre, like those "real-couples" movies
blacksilver: I agree with you that my comment sounds a bit harsh, especially since I hadn't clarified it earlier. Given my response to dumblonde above, you should now be able to see why I said that. In general, I believe that a good "porn director" is one that prioritizes good camera angles/positions over the enjoyment of the performers, and yet manages to make it seem as if they were thoroughly enjoying themselves . In fact, I think many directors who participate in the action end up focusing less on the viewer and the end product suffers as a result. One notable exception here is Tom Byron, who has always, IMHO, been the best performer in his self-directed movies. Erik, I'm afraid, seems to get carried away even more so the whole thing degenerates into "real sex being taped for sale as porn". Not what I'm looking for :-)
Renee: Noted. As mentioned above, though, I think performers get PAID to perform for the viewer, not to enjoy the sex.
Erik Everhard: Point taken. As I said earlier myself, I've really stopped buying the movies you direct :-( But I can't really completely avoid you because I can't simply pass on some potentially great movie simply because you're there. I usually buy it and hope you're not with the girls I like most :-) Guess I'll try to do more research about the scenes before purchase, but sometimes the movie is too new for this info to be on ADT or the vendor site. On the other hand, Erik, maybe you can re-examine you great performance with Gauge in Unnatural Sex 5 and try to emulate it at least in terms of good camera angles/positions :-). You were also not as loud there :-)
dude< come on. nobody is ganging up on you. thats unfair.obviously most people on this thread are going be fans of eric but besides that maybe there are just people that don't share your view of what good gonzo is. ive seen the kind of over directed gonzo youre talking about. it's out there for audiences like you who want to see it but that doesnt mean that all gonzo movies have to be like that and i think youre really wrong about 'couple' movies being less directed than gonzo. its the coulpes movies that are always directed by every position and shot. what i love about gonzo is that the actors are allowed to move around and express themselves. for me to watch two people enjoy themselves having sex is what porn is all about and why i watch. that includes the noises from the man and the woman.
I worked with Tera Joy a couple of times and I always enjoyed it. She is really special. But I agree with you, this scene was one of the best I ever had the pleasure to be in it.
Overly directed gonzo porn is an oxymoron. It's supposed to be more realistic, more spontaneous than feature type porn. When a director starts micro-managing the action - telling the woman to look at the camera, now moan, let the cum drip down your face - to me it looks like a badly choreographed action scene from a Grade B movie. And too often, all the heat goes out the window as well.
I hope you can find a director who meets your viewing needs, and gives you the camera angles you want. For me, I want it as free-form (within reasonable limits) as possible.
Steve Holmes - It's been 3 months since I watched that Tera Joy scene. I looked at a minimum of another 40 scenes since that time, and still, that Tera scene comes out on top.
Renee/superchic^1983: I don't really know for a fact which is more closely directed (features or gonzo) but I have to say that from watching behind the scenes clips of some gonzo and some Private features (back when their stuff was good), they seemed about the same.
The Assman series is an example of what some may call "over-directed" gonzo. That feeling is partly accentuated due to the fact that the director's instructions are included in the soundtrack rather then edited out! JYLC, however, has promised to talk less in the future :-)
Renee said: "I hope you can find a director who meets your viewing needs, and gives you the camera angles you want. For me, I want it as free-form (within reasonable limits) as possible."
Thanks. I already know of serveral :-) For example, the king of camera angles right now is Jonni Darkko. His Anal Trainer series is amazing. Tom Byron and Jules Jordan are also in the same league.
You may also enjoy the first scene from OUT NUMBERED #1. Erik, Steve Holmes & Terra Joy are among the performers in the scene and the three of them carry on the same intensity from the SPORT FUCKING scene. There's a moment about 45 minutes into the scene when you can see Erik pounding her brains out. When he stops the look on her face is of disappointment that he has not continued. He then lays down on his back & she precedes to start rimming him before the sex starts again. The best part is that it's all shot from a pulled back view which gives the audience a realistic feel for the action. It's a short, yet brilliant, moment in an otherwise standard reverse gang bang scene.
I too find that I enjoy all pornography more, including features, when there is less direction of the sex & more direction with what's going on around the action. If you have performers who are into one another sexually, I feel, it's best to capture what transpires between them instead of trying to direct every movement they make. I don't care either way if there's a lot direction in terms of the set design but when it comes down to the sex, I prefer seeing more natural reactions from the performers mixed with talented lighting.
In my opinion (at least from what I've seen) you see a mix of this in Erik Everhard's direction. The majority of his scenes seem to be highly directed in terms of capturing that position or this theme, etc. Occasionally I'll find a scene in one of his movies in which I feel that the energy is just flowing from the performers and that it's them creating the scene, not the director. Those are my favorite and tend to be one on one scenes between Erik & a female without a third or fourth party involved sexually.
I finally screened "Ass Obsessed #2" , and here's what I have to say to Everhard .
Man, I hope you're not looking forward to anything special in the afterlife, cuz you are getting your heaven RIGHT HERE ON EARTH! I watched that flick and thought, "No man, NO ONE MAN, should be allowed to have the fun you did fucking Dana Vespoli, Katja Kassin, and Serena South, in the same movie." I'd give a limb, some years of my life, and my financial portfolio, (such as it is), to bone any ONE of them, and you get to bag all three? In one movie?!
That's just wrong. It's just wrong.
You are NOT getting into Heaven, cuz you are livin' large down here.
I am of course interested in the women in the scenes but the guy does make a difference. Everhard is definitely one of my fav performers. Yeah he is loud but at least you know he gets into it and in turn the women do....plus he fucks them hard and keeps wood, so no worries. Also, as someone else said, he doesnt bust out the lame ass curses every second, I am down for rough sex but not into cursing women out while doing it unless they want it lol.
Agreed. I've noticed that too. I'm not really into scenes where the woman (or women) are called names...regardless of whether it's just a "joke" or part of the scene...
The more respectful, passionate and real porn is the better IMO...and the better the image of Porn in general would be too I believe...
I don't know if Mr. Dick Johnson is still reading this thread, but I have an Everhard scene I can recommend that he have a good look at, since he's complained that EE is too loud for his tastes. It's in Jules Jordan's Weapon's of Ass Destruction 2, the last scene with EE and Bella Marie.
I swear, Everhard doesn't say more than 10 words the entire time. Bella Marie does most of the talking, and a lot more. These two went at each other like two animals, and luckily Jules Jordan was there to catch it all on film.
It's too bad that EE can't appear in any upcoming JJ films, what with the lock-down (or lock-up, or lock-out, or whatever it's called) that PXP/RLD has got on all their male performers. Now, if only Jules Jordan could film Tera Joy and Everhard, that would be a menage a trois made in heaven.
Haven't been here for some time now, but I just logged on in time to see this ;-)
I do have that movie but I don't recall the scene. But I believe you when you say EE was quieter there. I've always said that EE is great under the right director, one who keeps his vocal outbursts under control :-) E.g. I mentioned EE's scene with Gauge in Un-natural Sex #5 as a scene where he wasn't as loud as his scene with her in one of his self-directed movies.
In WOAD 2, I don't think it was Jules Jordan who was "keeping EE and his vocal outbursts under control". I've seen this happen before - when Everhard is with an actress who herself is pretty active and talks a fair amount, he'll pay attention to her, and not talk that much himself. I don't think it has anything to do with the director, because I've seen this with 3 different ones.
On the other hand, when Everhard is with a passive actress who's not into the action much, then he can get on the vocal side (I have no idea why this is). Dick Johnson, I suggest you pass on Jake Malone's Fuck Dolls #2 - the scene with EE and Aspen Stevens has some of the loudest and long-running vocalizations I've ever heard from Everhard, though I didn't mind them in the least.
With some male performers, it's just the opposite. Rocco Siffredi gets louder the more active the actress is, and he gets quieter, even looks bored, if the actress is passive. Which goes to show - there's no predicting men.
Walter Burns - If you start a thread about a male performer who people have strong opinions about, especially one who's been in over 600 filmslike EE, then you'll get lots of posts. Go ahead and start one on Mark Davis; that one should draw people in, too.
I don't know who's to thank for that, but I just liked it. I hadn't noticed this so I just guessed it was the director controlling the action. I don't pay attention to guys, so if they do get my attention it's usually because of something I didn't like . I've also seen it in the past where directors tell the actors not to do something. E.g. Luciano/Michael Stefano had a tendency to spank girls till they turned red which really turned me off -- overheard the director once telling him to stop it (maybe it was in behind-the-scenes)Thanks for the warning!
On WOAD #2, there's some bonus footage of Everhard and Bella Marie, with Jules Jordan on the camera. From those few minutes, from what I recall, Bella is doing most of the talking, sometimes to Erik, sometimes to Jules. I don't remember Jules saying anything to Everhard, certainly not anything about telling him to quiet down. In fact, it was Bella who was saying to Erik that he should start the anal sex nice and slow for her (which he did! ).
There isn't any extra footage on Fuck Dolls 2 with Everhard and Aspen Stevens, so no way to know what was going on in the scene between them and the director.
Walter Burns, don't take my suggestion about Mark Davis as a command, it's just a suggestion. Though I am thinking of doing something similar to your "Mystery Babe of the Week". But instead of a picture, I'll post the word-for-word transcripts of several different male performers mid-scene, and see if people can guess who they are, based on their vocalizations, or lack thereof.
About Everhard: He seems to be in all the Mike John titles I've seen and Mike John seems to be sort of co-directing all Everhard's titles. Are these two generally partners on all their titles and who gets credited as director just depends on what series they are shooting for?
While the titles he's directed have generally lacked a little heat IMHO, as a performer he's never disappointed. If he's a tad loud, it's never bothered me, that's just his style. His enthusiasm always makes him seem like a kid in a candy store to me. While his mouth is sometimes going as fast as his thrusts, at least it's more of the "oh, yeah" kind than the verbal abuse that seems so prevalent in much recent gonzo. Again the kid/candy store image seems fitting.
Also when he's with a confident girl who gives as good as she gets, his high energy style can push a scene to new heights. Of all his scenes, the one in From Her Ass To Her Mouth with Lily Thai and Dana Vespoli where Lily slaps back at him whenever he spanks her ass is probably my favourite. He started to pop early, so he must have liked it as well.
What is the origin of the 'hate plow' moniker anyway? When has he ever 'grudge fucked' a girl? Wouldn't 'Jackrabbit' be more appropriate.
IAFD, supporters of beastiality. Just say no. 7564 Posts 11/02
Posted - Jun 15 2004 : 12:10PM
I didn't See. Really, I was just joking.I am always open for suggestions. In fact, how would you like to act as guest editor on the next male performer of the week. Consider this an official invitation. Mail me if you are interested.You are even nuttier than I am. I know the weekly performer series are labor intensive, but that will be nothing compared to your idea. I say: "Go for it." There is nothing like fun and games if you want to have some ... uhm... fun.
billyjizz said: "I am a shamefully inadequate member of our 'Must buy and accumulate things' society."
Erik Everhard @ AEBN
Posted - Apr 18 2004 : 11:03AM
